Peter Todd writes:
> On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 12:28:49PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
>> Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
>> writes:
>> > However I don't think we've done a good job showing why we need to
>> > implement this feature via nSequence.
>>
>> It could be implemented in other ways, but nSequen
Off topic.
On Oct 9, 2015 4:27 AM, "Boris Neklabaro via bitcoin-dev" <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Interesting:
>
> http://kke5edzhy54hiee5.onion/
> (requires Tor Browser)
>
> or without Tor Browser:
> http://kke5edzhy54hiee5.onion.to/
>
>
>
You are mixing multiple issues.
1. It is not possible to "checkpoint" in a totally decentralized and
trustless way. You need the whole blockchain to confirm its validity, as
a single invalid tx in the history will invalidate ALL blocks after it,
even if the invalid tx is irrelevant to you.
2
Before I scare anyone away, please here me out:
It occurs to me it wouldn't be all that difficult to support the ability
to define soft forks entirely as standalone units that can be trivially
merged with Bitcoin Core. It would require a few changes in some places
in the consensus code, but at
Hello,
I have been working on database engineering for many years and there are
some things i don't understand very well about how bitcoin architecture
works. I have not written here because i would not like to disturb
development with yet another of those far to implement ideas that does
not
Interesting:
http://kke5edzhy54hiee5.onion/(requires Tor Browser)
or without Tor Browser:http://kke5edzhy54hiee5.onion.to/
___
bitcoin-dev mailing list
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 7:55 PM, Boris Neklabaro via bitcoin-dev
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to merge 2 utxos spending from multiple P2SH inputs? Or
> combined inputs P2SH and P2PKH in a single transaction?
Yes, the signatures for separate inputs are entirely separate.
Hi,
Is it possible to merge 2 utxos spending from multiple P2SH inputs? Or combined
inputs P2SH and P2PKH in a single transaction?
___
bitcoin-dev mailing list
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitco
On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 12:28:49PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
> Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
> writes:
> > However I don't think we've done a good job showing why we need to
> > implement this feature via nSequence.
>
> It could be implemented in other ways, but nSequence is the neatest and
> most
On Sat, Oct 03, 2015 at 04:30:56PM +0200, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> BIP68 and BIP112 collectively define the CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY semantics,
Another issue that came to mind re: CSV review is that there isn't
actually any one pull-req with all the code changes together, making it
hard to
10 matches
Mail list logo
