-
From: Matt Corallo [mailto:lf-li...@mattcorallo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 10 February, 2016 06:15
To: jl2...@xbt.hk; bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] A roadmap to a better header format and bigger
block size
As for your stages idea, I generally like the idea (and
As for your stages idea, I generally like the idea (and mentioned it may
be a good idea in my proposal), but am worried about scheduling two
hard-forks at onceLets do our first hard-fork first with the things
we think we will need anytime in the visible future that we have
reasonable designs fo
I believe i've seen Luke say this several times before, but there are
several more things that the majority of the devs agree should be in
bitcoin.
I would suggest to compile that list for your stage 3, so that you can have
an hardfork that fixes most of those things, and there should be some
repos
I would like to present a 2-3 year roadmap to a better header format and
bigger block size
Objectives:
1. Multistage rule changes to make sure everyone will have enough time to
upgrade
2. Make mining easier, without breaking existing mining hardware and the
Stratum protocol
3. Make future hardfor
