Thanks for the links!
Blocksonly is definitely a relevant piece. However, I’m wondering what are the
implications, especially at larger scale. For example, transactions processing
will be not smooth anymore and will happen every 10 minutes at once. Another
question is transaction propagation.
Yeah, sure.
> How much bandwidth is consumed by redundant tx INVs currently?
Currently, for an average public-IP node all INVs consume 0.05 Mbps or 540
megabytes per day. This number is based on current ratio public-IP
nodes:private-IP nodes and transaction rate. This number is a sum of both
in
On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 10:18 PM, Gleb Naumenko via bitcoin-dev
wrote:
> Hi all,
> I have a couple of ideas regarding transaction relay protocol and wanted to
> share it with and probably get some feedback.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1377345.0
https://people.xiph.org/~greg/mempool_sy
Hey. This idea sounds quite interesting. It'd be helpful to see some more
numbers to evaluate it.
- How much bandwidth is consumed by redundant tx INVs currently? What is
this as a % of overall bandwidth usage?
- How would filtering txs through N=2 links affect network propagation?
This probably r
Hi all,
I have a couple of ideas regarding transaction relay protocol and wanted to
share it with and probably get some feedback.
I did some emulation and simulation and found out that around 90% of INV
messages sent by public-IP nodes are idle (duplicate), obviously because each
node creates 8
