Re: [bitcoin-dev] Status updates for BIP 9, 68, 112, and 113

2016-08-18 Thread Btc Drak via bitcoin-dev
Fine by me to update BIP68 and BIP112 to Final status. The forks have activated. On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 4:30 PM, Luke Dashjr wrote: > Daniel Cousens opened the issue a few weeks ago, that BIP 9 should > progress to > Accepted stage. However, as an informational BIP, it is not

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Status updates for BIP 9, 68, 112, and 113

2016-08-18 Thread Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev
On Friday, July 15, 2016 4:46:57 PM Wladimir J. van der Laan wrote: > On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 03:52:37PM +, Luke Dashjr wrote: > > On Friday, July 15, 2016 3:46:28 PM Wladimir J. van der Laan wrote: > > > I'm not sure why it is labeled as only "Informational" in the first > > > place, as BIP9

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Status updates for BIP 9, 68, 112, and 113

2016-07-15 Thread Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 04:08:51PM +, Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev wrote: > Daniel Cousens opened the issue a few weeks ago, that BIP 9 should progress > to > Accepted stage. However, as an informational BIP, it is not entirely clear on > whether it falls in the Draft/Accepted/Final

[bitcoin-dev] Status updates for BIP 9, 68, 112, and 113

2016-07-15 Thread Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev
Daniel Cousens opened the issue a few weeks ago, that BIP 9 should progress to Accepted stage. However, as an informational BIP, it is not entirely clear on whether it falls in the Draft/Accepted/Final classification of proposals requiring implementation, or the Draft/Active classification like