I feel everyone should re-read that last paragraph as it carries the most
weight IMO.
On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 9:50 AM, kjj wrote:
> Just some general comments on this topic/discussion.
>
> I suspect that there exist no algorithms which cannot be done better in
> an application-specific device th
is done.
> El 17/06/2014 15:58, "Ron Elliott" escribió:
>
>> In this scenario how do you ensure the miner solving the block cannot
>> reapportion the subsidy to himself rather than the pool?
>> On Jun 17, 2014 2:09 AM, "Raúl Martínez" wrote:
>>
>
In this scenario how do you ensure the miner solving the block cannot
reapportion the subsidy to himself rather than the pool?
On Jun 17, 2014 2:09 AM, "Raúl Martínez" wrote:
> First of all I apologice due to the possible mistakes in my writing below,
> I am not a Bitcoin developer but I have som
3 matches
Mail list logo
