I think you're misunderstanding the point. The way you get IsStandard
changed is that you make an application-oriented BIP detailing the use
of some new standard transaction type (say, generalized hash-locked
transactions for atomic swaps). We then discuss that proposal for its
technical merits and
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 9:26 PM, Luke-Jr wrote:
> They define standard for interoperability between
> software. So, if you want nodes to relay these transactions, you need to
> convince them, not merely write a BIP for the transaction format.
I agree with you in theory, each miner could decide
On Friday, April 25, 2014 8:02:41 PM Tier Nolan wrote:
> I don't think the cross chain system needs a BIP (except to justify this
> one).
>
> If cross chain transfer become popular, then it would be useful to ensure
> that clients are interoperable, but first things first. If the
> transactions a
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Tier Nolan wrote:
>> This looks reasonable from a brief skim over, but does not define any use
>> cases (it mentions "necessary for atomic cross chain transfers", but does
>> not
>> explain how it is useful for that - perhaps that belongs in another BIP
>> you
>> h
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 8:58 PM, Peter Todd wrote:
> Keep in mind that P2SH redeemScripts are limited to just 520 bytes;
> there's going to be many cases where more complex transactions just
> can't be encoded in P2SH at all.
>
True. Having said that, this is just a change to isStandard(), rath
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 8:17 PM, Luke-Jr wrote:
> I believe you meant to link here instead?
> https://github.com/TierNolan/bips/blob/bip4x/bip-0046.mediawiki
>
> Yeah, sorry.
> This looks reasonable from a brief skim over, but does not define any use
> cases (it mentions "necessary for atom
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 07:17:48PM +, Luke-Jr wrote:
> I believe you meant to link here instead?
> https://github.com/TierNolan/bips/blob/bip4x/bip-0046.mediawiki
>
> This looks reasonable from a brief skim over, but does not define any use
> cases (it mentions "necessary for atomic cross
I believe you meant to link here instead?
https://github.com/TierNolan/bips/blob/bip4x/bip-0046.mediawiki
This looks reasonable from a brief skim over, but does not define any use
cases (it mentions "necessary for atomic cross chain transfers", but does not
explain how it is useful for that
This is a BIP to allow the spender to choose one of multiple standard
scripts to use for spending the output.
https://github.com/TierNolan/bips/blob/bip4x/bip-0045.mediawiki
This is required as part of the atomic cross chain transfer protocol. It
is required so that outputs can be retrieved, if
9 matches
Mail list logo
