Re: [Bitcoin-development] Detailed gitian build guide

On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 6:47 AM, devrandom wrote: > Nice! > > I wonder how much of this could be scripted. > Everything, probably, using vmbuilder (and/or vagrant as Nick Simpson suggests). But that's not the point here. It is to provide exact steps that people can follow to get a basic (virtual)

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Detailed gitian build guide

Nice! I wonder how much of this could be scripted. On Wed, 2014-04-02 at 14:27 +0200, Wladimir wrote: > Hello all, > > > I'm working on a detailed guide on how to install and set up a Debian > VM for gitian building. As this guide can be used on any operating > system that has VirtualBox, hopef

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Okay, time to bring up bitcoin/bitcoin

On 4/2/2014 12:45 PM, Laszlo Hanyecz wrote: > Maybe he has a fork on the real github.com and the link was a mistake. > > http://news.nurse.com/article/20121203/NY02/112030026#.Uzw5UVy2uw8 > > I think it's possible that 'Kevin' is for real and maybe he doesn't realize > he linked to a phishing site

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Okay, time to bring up bitcoin/bitcoin

On 4/2/2014 12:55 PM, Jud wrote: Looks like Kevin was probably trying to point us to his fork for comments: https://github.com/kjsisco/bitcoin/tree/patch-1 -- Jud On Wednesday, April 2, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Laszlo Hanyecz wrote: Maybe he has a fork on the real github.com and

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Okay, time to bring up bitcoin/bitcoin

Maybe he has a fork on the real github.com and the link was a mistake. http://news.nurse.com/article/20121203/NY02/112030026#.Uzw5UVy2uw8 I think it's possible that 'Kevin' is for real and maybe he doesn't realize he linked to a phishing site, if it was an accident. If this is the same person,

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Okay, time to bring up bitcoin/bitcoin

Looks like Kevin was probably trying to point us to his fork for comments: https://github.com/kjsisco/bitcoin/tree/patch-1 -- Jud On Wednesday, April 2, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Laszlo Hanyecz wrote: > Maybe he has a fork on the real github.com (http://github.com) and the link > was a mistake. >

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Okay, time to bring up bitcoin/bitcoin

On 4/2/2014 11:45 AM, Ricardo Filipe wrote: > Kevin, > the thing is you gave us a bad link... what is the correct URL of your > project? > > 2014-04-02 16:30 GMT+01:00 Kevin : >> On 4/2/2014 11:13 AM, Laszlo Hanyecz wrote: >>> Maybe this site serves up exploits selectively? I'm guessing most peop

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Okay, time to bring up bitcoin/bitcoin

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 04/02/2014 03:41 PM, Laszlo Hanyecz wrote: > www.githubb.com resolves to addresses announced by AS53665 > > Some basic info about AS53665 can be seen at > http://bgp.he.net/AS53665 They probably have a dedi or VPS at > Cogent. They didn't even cre

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Okay, time to bring up bitcoin/bitcoin

Kevin, the thing is you gave us a bad link... what is the correct URL of your project? 2014-04-02 16:30 GMT+01:00 Kevin : > On 4/2/2014 11:13 AM, Laszlo Hanyecz wrote: >> Maybe this site serves up exploits selectively? I'm guessing most people >> are getting the 'domain for sale' but whoever is

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Okay, time to bring up bitcoin/bitcoin

www.githubb.com resolves to addresses announced by AS53665 Some basic info about AS53665 can be seen at http://bgp.he.net/AS53665 They probably have a dedi or VPS at Cogent. They didn't even create an IRR record for their AS or their only route. Let's see what google has to say about malware fr

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Okay, time to bring up bitcoin/bitcoin

Maybe this site serves up exploits selectively? I'm guessing most people are getting the 'domain for sale' but whoever is the target probably gets something special? On Apr 2, 2014, at 2:53 PM, Kevin wrote: > On 4/2/2014 9:08 AM, Jeff Garzik wrote: >> At first, this is a poor choice of URL.

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Okay, time to bring up bitcoin/bitcoin

On 4/2/2014 11:13 AM, Laszlo Hanyecz wrote: > Maybe this site serves up exploits selectively? I'm guessing most people are > getting the 'domain for sale' but whoever is the target probably gets > something special? > > On Apr 2, 2014, at 2:53 PM, Kevin wrote: > >> On 4/2/2014 9:08 AM, Jeff Gar

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Okay, time to bring up bitcoin/bitcoin

On 4/2/2014 9:08 AM, Jeff Garzik wrote: > At first, this is a poor choice of URL. > > But it really looks like a phishing attempt that no one should visit. > > > On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 4:00 PM, Kevin wrote: >> I've sat on this for some time after starting this. I have forked this >> from bitcoin

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Okay, time to bring up bitcoin/bitcoin

At first, this is a poor choice of URL. But it really looks like a phishing attempt that no one should visit. On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 4:00 PM, Kevin wrote: > I've sat on this for some time after starting this. I have forked this > from bitcoin core and am working on a secure tax "mode" for bitc

[Bitcoin-development] Detailed gitian build guide

Hello all, I'm working on a detailed guide on how to install and set up a Debian VM for gitian building. As this guide can be used on any operating system that has VirtualBox, hopefully this will make it easier for people to get started with gitian builds. See https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/p

Re: [Bitcoin-development] secure assigned bitcoin address directory

Hi Daryl, I think the reason nobody has done that is that BIP70 isn't really that much work. It's basically just certs inside a protobuf, with a bit of extra data. I'm not sure yet another way to do the same thing is worth much. On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 2:59 AM, Daryl Banttari wrote: > Chris, >