On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Krzysztof Okupski
wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> thank you for your invaluable feedback. As requested, the spec
> will from now on be under version control. It can be found under:
>
> https://github.com/minium/Bitcoin-Spec
>
> The old link to the PDF will be, just in case
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Mike Hearn wrote:
> Nice work, but please don't call it the "Bitcoin protocol spec". Your
> document is not a spec.
fair objection, fwiw.
> It is an attempt to describe in English the Bitcoin
> protocol, but anyone who implemented it based on your description wou
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Mike Hearn wrote:
> just out of curiosity, do you think it will be possible to create any
>> other proper protocol specifications rather than the C++ original?
>
>
> Well it's a finite code base so yes, it should be possible.
>
> The only problem is so far
Sorry for top posting and the brevity but I'm typing from my phone
You shoud be interested in this post by Justus Ranvier then:
https://bitcoinism.liberty.me/economic-fallacies-and-the-block-size-limit-part-2-price-discovery/
On Jun 15, 2015 8:57 PM, "Raystonn ." wrote:
> I have been toying wit
egun writing code to implement
what was described in the liked post, but I'm sure he will reply to
you since he's subscribed to this mailing list.
>
>
>
> From: sick...@gmail.com
> Sent: Monday, June 15, 2015 12:18 PM
> To: Raystonn .
> Cc: Bitcoin Dev
> Subject
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 12:28 PM, Drak wrote:
> What is the official response from the Bitcoin Core developers about MtGox's
> assertion that their problems are due to a fault of bitcoin, as opposed to a
> fault of their own?
>
> The technical analysis preluding this mess, was that MtGox was
6 matches
Mail list logo
