On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Justus Ranvier justusranv...@gmail.comwrote:
You and Gavin could do a lot better by working on a Bitcoin social
contract - a promise of what features will *never* be added (or taken
away) from Bitcoin, because despite what you say it's not acceptable
to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/19/2014 09:41 PM, Gavin Andresen wrote:
Now I'm really confused.
Why would Mike or I have the authority to write a social contract
to promise anything about future-Bitcoin?
YOU can make promises about YOUR future behavior. So can everyone
Sorry. I will never agree to the concept of a relevant idea so dangerous it
cannot be discussed. That's medieval thinking. If you would like to create
a parallel development forum where people have to swear an oath not to
think bad thoughts, go right ahead and do so.
But I'm glad to see you
Okey dokey:
I hereby promise and solemnly swear on pain of atomic wedgie that I will
never ever work on or endorse any changes to the Bitcoin system that would
enable any person or group to confiscate, blacklist, or devalue any other
person or group's bitcoin.
RE: writing an RFC: go for it. I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/19/2014 10:06 PM, Mike Hearn wrote:
Sorry. I will never agree to the concept of a relevant idea so
dangerous it cannot be discussed. That's medieval thinking. If you
would like to create a parallel development forum where people have
to
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 1:01 PM, Justus Ranvier justusranv...@gmail.com wrote:
YOU can make promises about YOUR future behavior. So can everyone else.
The rest of the community can keep track of which developers will and
will not make promises about what changes they will and will not
attempt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/19/2014 11:07 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
I promise that if bad people show up with a sufficient pointy gun
that I'll do whatever they tell me to do. I'll make bad proposals,
submit backdoors, and argue with querulous folks on mailing lists,
7 matches
Mail list logo
