Re: [Bitcoin-development] Presenting a BIP for Shamir's Secret Sharing of Bitcoin private keys

2014-03-29 Thread devrandom
/bitcoin-development -- -- Miron / devrandom -- -- Miron / devrandom -- ___ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Presenting a BIP for Shamir's Secret Sharing of Bitcoin private keys

2014-03-29 Thread devrandom
. It's low-hanging fruit. Good points, although multisig is catching on quickly in the ecosystem. AFAIK, all production wallets can send to p2sh addresses. -- Miron / devrandom

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Detailed gitian build guide

2014-04-03 Thread devrandom
On Thu, 2014-04-03 at 07:51 +0200, Wladimir wrote: On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 6:47 AM, devrandom c1.sf-bitc...@niftybox.net wrote: Nice! I wonder how much of this could be scripted. Everything, probably, using vmbuilder (and/or vagrant as Nick Simpson suggests

Re: [Bitcoin-development] convention/standard for sorting public keys for p2sh multisig transactions

2015-01-14 Thread devrandom
-- Miron / devrandom -- New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA. GigeNET is offering a free month of service with a new server in Ashburn. Choose from 2 high performing configs, both

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Electrum 2.0 has been tagged

2015-03-17 Thread devrandom
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development -- devrandom / Miron -- Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership

Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP for standard multi-signature P2SH addresses

2015-03-11 Thread devrandom
/ ___ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development -- devrandom / Miron -- devrandom / Miron

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Electrum 2.0 has been tagged

2015-03-11 Thread devrandom
On 2015-03-11 05:11 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote: On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 11:50 PM, devrandom c1.sf-bitc...@niftybox.net wrote: That said, I do agree that mnemonic phrases should be portable, and find it unfortunate that the ecosystem is failing to standardize on phrase handling. The fact