So this is a limitation of Bitcoinj, I can solve this by abandoning this
dependency and using instead the bitcoin core project itself, correct?
On Monday, 10 July 2017 17:30:17 UTC-3, Andreas Schildbach wrote:
>
> It's a limitation of the Bitcoin protocol, inputs do not have value it's
> their
It's a limitation of the Bitcoin protocol, inputs do not have value it's
their connected output. In bitcoinj, only the Wallet class connects the
inputs to their outputs; since you probably don't use the Wallet you
likely need to do the connecting yourself.
On 07/06/2017 05:54 PM, Wladimir Filho
There is currently no way to have bitcoinj filter the list of
transactions, you'll have to do that yourself ATM.
We always envisioned having a second, more usecase-oriented list of
"payments". This would then represent the list shown to the user.
Lightning payments could be visible there too in
What you probably see is the received change from your transaction. You
could try creating a transaction without change and see if there is an
onCoinsReceived event too.
Also, as always, study the logfile.
On 07/10/2017 04:51 PM, Kunal Ransing wrote:
> Hi
>
> When I send coins I got callback
Hi
When I send coins I got callback in broadcastComplete as well
as onCoinsReceived.
I added receive listner as below:
// We want to know when we receive money.
kit.wallet().*addCoinsReceivedEventListener*(new
*WalletCoinsReceivedEventListener*() {
@Override
