Am Mittwoch, 22. Juni 2016 19:49:50 UTC+2 schrieb Andreas Schildbach:
>
> Hmm, I think I've seen that on a small scale, where sometimes 7 rather
> than 6 peers were connected.
A few peers more or less would be ok, but > 100 is a bit heavy... The
longer it is offline the higher the number.
Hmm, I think I've seen that on a small scale, where sometimes 7 rather
than 6 peers were connected. One fundamental problem is if you try to
connect to a number of peers to fill up your quota, you don't know how
many peers will actually get fully connected.
Anyway, I think the last one to work on
BitcoinJ gets too many connections after a reconnect as it adds up a lot of
potential candidates (inactives) and then try to connect to all of those
when getting the connection again. A check for maxConnections is missing to
not exceed connections. The nr. of connections I observed was > 100.