exec bbpager blackbox
Fran
:):):)
On Sun, 13 Jan 2002 20:26, you wrote:
In order to start bbpager with BlackBox, I added the line exec blackbox
bbpager to the xinitrc. bbpager does start with BlackBox this way.
However, It doesn't exit when I click on Exit on the menu. All the
windows
On Sunday 13 January 2002 15:44, you wrote:
Is there anyway to get Eterm working with Transparent background with
blackbox? Or must I use Aterm to get this feature working?
Yes, but you must use a gnome utility to set the background, like Esetroot,
else it won't work.
-- tinus
oh man, that sucks, i refuest to install GNOME. oh well, I can live
without it.
... On 01/13/02, Martijn Houtman decided to write ...
On Sunday 13 January 2002 15:44, you wrote:
Is there anyway to get Eterm working with Transparent background with
blackbox? Or must I use Aterm to get
yeah, figured it out, forgot bsetroot does gradient stuff of bb that
Eterm does not understand. So it only works for actual files.
... On 01/13/02, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry decided to write ...
On 13-Jan-2002 Martijn Houtman wrote:
On Sunday 13 January 2002 15:44, you wrote:
Is there anyway
On 13-Jan-2002 Anh Lai wrote:
yeah, figured it out, forgot bsetroot does gradient stuff of bb that
Eterm does not understand. So it only works for actual files.
So Eterm will not use a bsetroot generated background for transparency? If
this is true, it should be easily fixed. A bug in
On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 09:12:32AM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
On 13-Jan-2002 Anh Lai wrote:
yeah, figured it out, forgot bsetroot does gradient stuff of bb that
Eterm does not understand. So it only works for actual files.
So Eterm will not use a bsetroot generated background
echo $LANG gives: en
echo $LC_ALL gives nothing, it's not set
... On Sun, 13 Jan 2002 09:00:46 -0800 (PST) Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
[EMAIL PROTECTED] decided to write: ...
On 13-Jan-2002 Anh Lai wrote:
hello, I am new to Blackbox, but not to linux. Some themes come with
ansi fonts(.pcf), I
On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 03:54:36PM +0100, Martijn Houtman wrote:
On Sunday 13 January 2002 15:44, you wrote:
Is there anyway to get Eterm working with Transparent background with
blackbox? Or must I use Aterm to get this feature working?
Yes, but you must use a gnome utility to set the
On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 09:12:32AM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
On 13-Jan-2002 Anh Lai wrote:
yeah, figured it out, forgot bsetroot does gradient stuff of bb that
Eterm does not understand. So it only works for actual files.
So Eterm will not use a bsetroot generated background
On 04 Jan 2002 18:57:53 -0800
Mike Douglas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks good in Evolution.
Same in Sylpheed.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (PGP available)
We went through this in #blackbox a couple of months ago. You see it in
reverse with applications like aterm remembering old backgrounds:
1. use bsetroot to set the background.
2. aterm et al respect the background setting and transparency works.
3. Eterm complains about unsupported
Yes, but you must use a gnome utility to set the background, like
Esetroot, else it won't work.
Since when is Esetroot a Gnome utility? It's part of the Eterm
distribution.
You're right, I meant Enlightenment.
If you're using a 7.x Redhat, you can edit the /etc/sysconfig/i18n file and
change the LANG=en variable to LANG=POSIX. I didn't try LANG=C, but
either would probably work.
Tracy
On Sun, 13 Jan 2002 11:15:08 -0800 (PST)
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 13-Jan-2002 Anh Lai
On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 11:19:36AM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
So, I was a E hacker way back when and saw the birth of Eterm. I even used to
work with its author (ick).
You have my condolences. :) Eterm... bleah. So much required, for so
little gain.
When Eterm was created it was
On 13-Jan-2002 Marc Wilson wrote:
On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 11:19:36AM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
So, I was a E hacker way back when and saw the birth of Eterm. I even used
to
work with its author (ick).
You have my condolences. :) Eterm... bleah. So much required, for so
little
On 13-Jan-2002 Anh Lai wrote:
hmmm, I tried LANG=C, and LANG=POSIX and LANG unset, still does not display
the font wanted, only a big ugly one.
anymore ideas? I just exported the variable, i didnt change the
/etc/sysconfig/i18n.
you must do this BEFORE you launch X or blackbox. If you
I understand that, and that is what i did
i dropped to console, and exported to C, POSIX and unset it before starting X
... On Sun, 13 Jan 2002 12:06:46 -0800 (PST) Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
[EMAIL PROTECTED] decided to write: ...
On 13-Jan-2002 Anh Lai wrote:
hmmm, I tried LANG=C, and LANG=POSIX
On 13-Jan-2002 Anh Lai wrote:
hmmm, I tried LANG=C, and LANG=POSIX and LANG unset, still does not
display
the font wanted, only a big ugly one.
anymore ideas? I just exported the variable, i didnt change the
/etc/sysconfig/i18n.
ok, on the console where blackbox was started
Hi!
A while back, there was a similar discussion about the Xserver/font problem,
where i mentioned that i changed the artwiz fonts to work correctly with
blackbox. So if you would try them out i can send them to you ( since my
provider accidently removed my write permissions, i cannot put them
On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 12:05:54PM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
You can ask for the root, but you are then responsible for many other things,
the code is not as happy.
That makes sense. Must have happy code. ^_^
Atom's hold integer indexes into the X server. You store the Pixmap ID
On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 10:14:39PM +0100, Vincenzo Colosimo wrote:
However, there may be obsolete, since i have changed the file
blackbox-0.61.1/src/i18n.cc.
In the line 58 i've changed:
locale = setlocale(LC_ALL, );
to: locale = setlocale(LC_ALL, C);
After then all fonts are
Atom's hold integer indexes into the X server. You store the Pixmap ID and
then ask for it.
So of:
_XSETROOT_ID
_XROOTPMAP_ID
ESETROOT_PMAP_ID
Which is the one that you're supposed to use? I assume that
ESETROOT_PMAP_ID is the non-standard one that Eterm
On 13-Jan-2002 Marc Wilson wrote:
On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 10:14:39PM +0100, Vincenzo Colosimo wrote:
However, there may be obsolete, since i have changed the file
blackbox-0.61.1/src/i18n.cc.
In the line 58 i've changed:
locale = setlocale(LC_ALL, );
to: locale =
On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 02:22:31PM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
right, because aterm was not a login shell and thus your rc file was ignored.
No, bash reads ~/.bashrc on a non-login shell. That's what it's FOR:
When an interactive shell that is not a login shell is
On 13-Jan-2002 Marc Wilson wrote:
On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 02:22:31PM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
right, because aterm was not a login shell and thus your rc file was
ignored.
No, bash reads ~/.bashrc on a non-login shell. That's what it's FOR:
When an interactive shell that
On 14-Jan-2002 Eric Christian Carlsen wrote:
My vote is against adopting wmsetbg. I tried to use it with aterm using
transparecy and shading. Every time I moved or resized the window it took
literally two seconds before it fixes the transparency. It doesn't work
well
with aterm if you have
My vote is that you leave it alone.
Then again, I don't like having the terminals the same color as the background. I
much prefer a different and contrasting color.
Douglas
On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 06:57:21PM -0700, Eric Christian Carlsen wrote:
My vote is against adopting wmsetbg. I tried to use it with aterm using
transparecy and shading. Every time I moved or resized the window it took
literally two seconds before it fixes the transparency. It doesn't work well
I've spent the last hour or so playing with Eterm again. I think a lot of
prejudices I had against it were due to the Debian package of it. Dunno
what's really up with it, but it misbehaves terribly if I install the
package from unstable, yet if I build it myself it works fine. It's slower
29 matches
Mail list logo
