On Thu, 7 Feb 2002 10:50:33 -0700 (MST)
Eric Christian Carlsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just wondering if the 'crash on change to workspace 2' bug has been fixed with
the new release. I've experienced that a few times now and I was wondering if
it's worth it to update. The only reason I
On Thursday 07 February 2002 21:59, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 20:35:27 +0100
From: Mads Martin J?rgensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lets keep this like the kernel. One guy gets all the patches, and
decides what goes in or not.
Decisions are not a reason for or against cvs, it's
On Thursday 07 February 2002 16:20, xOr wrote:
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 10:06:35AM -0500, Jan Schaumann wrote:
Derek Cunningham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Feb07,02 10:42, Marco Fioretti wrote:
Head on over to
On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 11:24:12AM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
How would you like us to submit screenshots? Email them to you
personally? Normally, I would point you to my website, but the server is
trashed at the moment.
please, link to a URL. That way everyone can see
I run at 1280x1024 (17 LCD) and still use BB for the extra room. Of
course, I ran BB on a Sun 21 display because of the room. I've tried
3-4 Desktop Environments and have concluded I just don't like them.
I'd rather type rm file in a terminal window than drag a file icon
in a file manager to a
In message: Re: [BlackBox] I know I'm not supposed to like eyecandy, but...
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
on 08/02/2002 (Fri 09:36) Jeff Taylor wrote:
I run at 1280x1024 (17 LCD) and still use BB for the extra room. Of
course, I ran BB on a Sun 21 display because of the room. I've tried
3-4 Desktop
Now this is something I really don't get. I took a look at the KDE patch
since I use a lot of KDE apps. It's very small and doesn't need any KDE
libraries. Afaics there's absolutely no bloat in the patch, only a feature
that some people find nice. I simply can't see why a patch like this
amen! i can't imagine a file manager that could ever be better then $SHELL. i guess
eye candy means different things to different people, but to me blackbox is all eye
candy and pure X bliss...
* Jeff Taylor ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I run at 1280x1024 (17 LCD) and still use BB for the
On Fri, Feb08,02 09:13, dan radom wrote:
amen! i can't imagine a file manager that could ever be better then $SHELL. i
guess eye candy means different things to different people, but to me blackbox is all
eye candy and pure X bliss...
IMO, blackbox, coupled with a couple transparent
On 08-Feb-2002 Henrik Kinnunen wrote:
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002 10:50:33 -0700 (MST)
Eric Christian Carlsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just wondering if the 'crash on change to workspace 2' bug has been fixed
with
the new release. I've experienced that a few times now and I was wondering
if
it's
Now this is something I really don't get. I took a look at the KDE patch
since I use a lot of KDE apps. It's very small and doesn't need any KDE
libraries. Afaics there's absolutely no bloat in the patch, only a feature
that some people find nice. I simply can't see why a patch like this
On Fri, Feb08,02 10:36, Anh Lai wrote:
IMO, blackbox, coupled with a couple transparent decorless aterms (75%
shading, to differenciate them from the bg) is all the eye-candy I need!
And now i can choose to use Eterm transparency with the patch in cvs. ..
.tis nice.
OK... I must be
... On 02/08/02, Derek Cunningham decided to write ...
On Fri, Feb08,02 10:36, Anh Lai wrote:
IMO, blackbox, coupled with a couple transparent decorless aterms (75%
shading, to differenciate them from the bg) is all the eye-candy I need!
And now i can choose to use Eterm transparency
On Fri, Feb08,02 11:03, Anh Lai wrote:
Eterm could not use transparent mode with bsetbg generated backgrouds:
e.g: bsetbg -mod 4 4 -bg rgb:46/46/46 -fg rgb:53/53/53
only aterm could use this.
but Eterm would work if you just use bsetbg to point to a jpg.
now Eterm transparent mode works
I don't know if you have just slashdotted the site, but those are some
awesome images. I'm gonna grab me one or two.
Jeffrey
Quoting Derek Cunningham [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[snip]
But with http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Newsroom/BlueMarble/ why would one
not want to use a jpg?! :)
DC
On Fri, Feb08,02 12:34, Jeff Taylor wrote:
I don't know if you have just slashdotted the site, but those are some
awesome images. I'm gonna grab me one or two.
nah... someone else slashdotted the site earlier. :) bastards... I'll wait a
day or so, then get some images. :)
DC
Quoting
Hi...
not to beleaguer the STL discussion, but beyond performance/bloat issues
(yes, use the right tools for the right job) please bare in mind that the
Standard Template Library isn't so standard a template library ;)
if blackbox is to be x-platform/x-compiler (e.g. compile equally well
Are there any plans to distribute more styles with
upcoming releases of blackbox?
It seems that since styles themselves are just a few dozen
lines of text, it'd be a trivial size increase to the
BB distrib tarball if a bunch of new styles were added.
Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
Can you (and others who post screenshots) list the applications that are
running on the screen and the styles (and maybe bg image) used?
(Please consider adding that information to your webpage. I am curious
what a few of those apps are.)
I'll be updating the site
On 08-Feb-2002 scott wrote:
Are there any plans to distribute more styles with
upcoming releases of blackbox?
It seems that since styles themselves are just a few dozen
lines of text, it'd be a trivial size increase to the
BB distrib tarball if a bunch of new styles were added.
I was
On this note, a number of the best themes I've seen for BB come from m3g;
http://blackbox.nlc.no/index.html
In fact these are the only themes I use now
- Original Message -
From: scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Blackbox styles
Are there any plans to distribute more styles with
On 08-Feb-2002 Tig wrote:
On this note, a number of the best themes I've seen for BB come from m3g;
http://blackbox.nlc.no/index.html
In fact these are the only themes I use now
pretty good styles, they may wind up in a release some day .
Someone let our friend know blackbox lives
On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 11:53:00AM -0500, Derek Cunningham wrote:
I know there was some issues with setting the bg with something other than
Esetroot, but what's wrong with just using Esetroot?
Because being able to use Esetroot usually means that you have Eterm lying
around somewhere, since
On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 11:24:12AM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
please, link to a URL. That way everyone can see them and if my mail goes
flaky we do not lose anything.
Well, here's my contribution, although I'm not sure shaleh can use it. :)
http://members.cox.net/msw/index.html
--
24 matches
Mail list logo
