I found something fairly interesting, thought I'd check here to see if
anybody else can reproduce it before I submit. Using Sylpheed (0.8.0),
if you hit the Get button a dialog pops up and shows the download
status of the mail. If you toggle the decor of this dialog off, then
back on again it
On Wed, 24 Jul 2002 08:15:13 -0700 (PDT)
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think I found it, committing now. Let me know.
For reference this also happen(s|ed) with mozilla's url window.
Part of the problem is that there is no memory associated with the
decor setting. So if
Am I the only one having problems with this because of a bunch of
endlines stuck in places where they shouldn't be? Could you possibly
send this as an attachment instead?
On Mon, 15 Jul 2002 11:51:18 -0400
Roy Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As mentioned in a previous posting to the blackbox
On Sun, 14 Jul 2002 13:17:26 -0700 (PDT)
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe fluxbox implements such a feature by using tags (similar
to browser pages tags) to group windows together. However, I also
believe that only one window in the group is visible at any given
On Sat, 13 Jul 2002 20:49:00 -0700 (PDT)
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 14-Jul-2002 neuron wrote:
Posted this thread on a messageboard not related to bb, and got in
reply that I may wanna try this mailing list, so I am :)
running Maya on linux is SWEET, but .. I can't
On Wed, 10 Jul 2002 22:21:47 -0400
D. Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am just wondering about that mouse wheel patch... Is there any
reason why it wouldn't be incorporated into the next Blackbox release?
I mean, it should be stable enough, and I don't think that it really
slows down the
On Sun, 07 Jul 2002 20:54:14 -0700 (PDT)
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 07-Jul-2002 Mr.X wrote:
I'm currently using 0.65 beta1, and I've been noticing the toolbar
disappearing every once in a while. The only way to get it to
re-appear is to either use the reconfigure menu
On Sun, 07 Jul 2002 10:02:57 -0700 (PDT)
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can not reproduce the xine bug 567967. Can anyone else comment on
whether this is actually fixed, only relevant to certain versions of
xine or whatever?
Thanks.
I had this problem also with xine 0.9.9
On Fri, 07 Jun 2002 07:24:13 -0700
Mike Douglas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tried it, used it for a day, uninstalled it and returned to Blackbox.
Tried it again after awhile, used it for a day, uninstalled it and
returned to Blackbox. I finally came to the conclusion that all I
really wanted
On 06 Jun 2002 12:11:16 -0400
Matthew Weier O'Phinney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ooops!!! Spoke too soon. Actually, it works fine -- but the direction
is off: The wheel scrolls through the workspaces in the opposite
direction from what it used to do. (For example -- what would be
scrolling up
On 06 Jun 2002 12:00:55 -0400
Matthew Weier O'Phinney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2002-06-06 at 11:19, Scott Furt wrote:
Good morning everyone:
I couldnt get any sleep last night so i decided to hack up
bbrun and modify it to bbweb.
Now, instead of typing in a binary to run,
On Thu, 6 Jun 2002 09:08:51 -0500
xOr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 09:49:46AM -0400, Matthew Weier O'Phinney
wrote:
I decided, after all the fun discussion on the list lately, to try
out alpha8. After compiling and going into X, I realized I hadn't
applied the
On Fri, 31 May 2002 00:03:59 -0700 (PDT)
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This has been happening to me for a while also. I usually only have
aterms and xmms open. Although, I might have had sylpheed open now
that I think about it. When I switch workspaces, BAM, it crashes.
On Fri, 31 May 2002 19:41:51 +0100
Martin Rowe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 31 May 2002 6:27 pm, Jamin W.Collins wrote:
On Fri, 31 May 2002 18:07:33 +0100
Martin Rowe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which version of OpenOffice.org1.0? - the 'unofficial' debs of 1.0
or from the
I'm not sure if this has already been discussed or not (maybe I missed
it), but a feature that I've always loved from WindowMaker/Enlightenment
is the ability to scroll the mouse-wheel over the root window (or even
the toolbar maybe?) and change workspaces. It really grows on you.
This doesn't
On Tue, 28 May 2002 22:51:51 -0700 (PDT)
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem is so few people know X, real X not GTK or KDE. Most of
the bugs we get are I opened this thing and it acted weird. Brad
was commenting a few days ago about how he was hoping two years later
On Mon, 27 May 2002 07:15:26 +0100
Martin Rowe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
0.2 works better - I can now see the minutes changing, rather than
stuck at 24. Cheers.
Regards, Martin
Yeah, I can't believe I did that. It's okay, I have a long history of
making retarded mistakes :)
Well, I wanted a bbtool that showed my uptime, so I made a few changes
to bbdate and got...(drumroll): BBUPTIME! It's not much, I dunno if
anybody else would even want it, but I figured I might as well give it a
bit of advertising. If you wanna know what the hell I'm talking about,
check out
On Sun, 26 May 2002 23:24:17 +0100
Martin Rowe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OT, but is that an application launcher in the middle of the Slit, to
the left of the bbkeys graphic? If so, which one?
That would be wmbutton, a Window Maker dockapp. I just call it with
geometry set to 64x24 (or
Well, it's official, I'm a dumbass. I already found a bug in that
bastard of a bbtool. You'll notice it (or at least EYE noticed it),
when your days 1, but your hours == 0. I just release version 0.2 and
it fixes the problem. Heh, just like me, I change like 5 lines of code
and there's still
On Fri, 24 May 2002 09:38:08 -0700 (PDT)
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The every waking moment for Matt release
alpha7 has lots of small fixes for lots of things.
Dock apps work better (even wmswallow)
little pixel offset issues solved, no more overlaps
some
On Fri, 2002-05-24 at 13:15, John L. Clark wrote:
Ok, I was browsing through the blackbox screenshots when I stumbled
across the ones posted by Derek Cunningham
URL:http://www2.skynet.ca/~mindhaze/screenshots/. It prompted me to
give aterm a shot, and lo-and-behold, it's a pretty terminal.
Do the bbtools seems screwed up to anybody else? I'm using the latest
CVS, and when I start up bbtools with the -w option they all overlap
and just overall do screwy things they shouldn't. I tried it out in
Fluxbox and they seemed to work normally. By the way, WM dockapps work
normally.
On Tue, 21 May 2002 12:59:21 -0700 (PDT)
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have bbkeys and bbpal in the slit on my machine. I have heard
reports of other bbtools misbehaving and comment on this in the alpha5
release notes. bbppp, bbsload, bbmail all have issues currently.
We
On 21 May 2002 08:34:12 +1200
Matt Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I updated, rebuilt, restarted, and tested everything again right
before I emailed all that stuff. So, yes, *current* cvs. I'm updating
daily anyhow.
I got college all morning (ie now), but I'll have a look at that stuff
On Mon, 20 May 2002 18:29:18 -0700 (PDT)
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let's clarify for a moment.
What I was referring to is his comment that windows were still not
snapping to the edge rather they were slightly covering. I have tried
numerous styles and apps and do not see
On Sat, 18 May 2002 14:22:18 +0200
Mads Martin Jørgensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And you of course reported it, so they know?
--
Mads Martin Jørgensen, http://mmj.dk
Why make things difficult, when it is possible to make them cryptic
and totally illogic, with just a little bit more
I'm almost certain this is a Blackbox not a GVim issue, but I thought
before I submitted it as a bug I'd see if a few others can duplicate it.
The problem occurs when maximizing GVim, instead of maximizing to the
size of the screen, or the screen minus the slit and toolbar, it goes
much bigger.
On Thu, 16 May 2002 11:37:54 +0100
Robert Marshall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure that's a BB problem at all. AFAICS it's mozilla waiting
for a resource that's not free. I've seen it in the past as
well. Just kill the program occupying the resource, and mozilla
continues.
Does
On Tue, 14 May 2002 22:39:32 -0600
dan radom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
errr i meant bsetbg, not bsetroot
* dan radom ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
it seems it still reports ...
lunar:~$ blackbox -version
Blackbox 1997 - 2000 Brad Hughes
0.65.0alpha3 : (c)
On Wed, 15 May 2002 00:56:50 -0400
Mr.X [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 14 May 2002 22:39:32 -0600
dan radom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
errr i meant bsetbg, not bsetroot
* dan radom ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
it seems it still reports ...
lunar:~$ blackbox -version
On Wed, 15 May 2002 09:23:56 -0700 (PDT)
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
#554003 on the sf.net tracker is causing us problems. I can not
#recreate it
here and the first guess seems to be wrong.
Anyone out there mind giving this one a look and seeing if you can a)
recreate it
On Wed, 15 May 2002 13:43:23 -0700 (PDT)
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hmm, scary, mozilla is an mp3 player too? eek.
I wonder if this is part of the issue.
No, I didn't mean playing mp3s WITH Mozilla, I meant with XMMS, or
Freeamp, or anything for that matter. That makes
On Tue, 14 May 2002 01:02:52 -0700 (PDT)
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is my fault. I broke the code involved when I moved blackbox
from char[] to std::string. Just committed a fix in cvs.
My problem was the old code did this:
case nop:
menu-insert(label);
but
On Tue, 14 May 2002 18:38:17 -0400
Scott Furt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul Mackinney wrote:
That's the only reason it's on my box. I run Debian, so I just
install with
apt-get install gnome-terminal
Can anyone suggest a good Debian resource where i could
see the differences
I'm using Blackbox version 0.65alpha3, and the [nop]
menu item seems to have stopped working. It still puts
up a non-operational menu selection, but it'll no
longer let me give it a label. Maybe I'm doing it
wrong, but I'm just using the same menu as before. I
use it like this:
[nop] ()
36 matches
Mail list logo
