forwarded because my current email address wasn't subscribed. :)
- Forwarded message from Derek Cunningham [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: Derek Cunningham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: BlackBox Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 12 May 2002 01:42:08 -0400
Subject: Re: Problems with replying
On Sat, 11 May 2002 22:23:12 -0700 (PDT)
Mr. Brigham Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Regarding your comment I would have to say that the argument presented
in the document you referenced is spurious for the following reasons.
(snip)
The reasons for not munging the Reply-To header presented are
Mr. Brigham Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In actual truth I would argue that adding a Reply-To: is the Correct way
to implement the needed behavior for two reasons:
1. From: should reference the person that wrote the email.
2. A response in the majority of cases should go to [EMAIL
Hey guys,
I use majordomo at work and I know you can set it up to add a
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
header to the mail when majordomo sends it on to the list subscribers.
That way you hit reply and it goes back to majordomo without having to
dink with anything and keep using whatever mail
Mr. Brigham Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey guys,
I use majordomo at work and I know you can set it up to add a
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
header to the mail when majordomo sends it on to the list subscribers.
That way you hit reply and it goes back to majordomo without having to
On 12-May-2002 Mr. Brigham Young wrote:
Hey guys,
I use majordomo at work and I know you can set it up to add a
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
header to the mail when majordomo sends it on to the list subscribers.
That way you hit reply and it goes back to majordomo without having to
Hi Jan,
No Offense whatsover :)
Regarding your comment I would have to say that the argument presented in
the document you referenced is spurious for the following reasons.
1. The author says they still use elm. ;-)
2. The Author refers to a Principle of Minimal Munging (in quotes)
implying
