DJ Lucas wrote:
Actually, rman was forgotten in the support archives. Polygotoman IIRC
contains the current version of rman. It needs to be added to the book
and it is a runtime dep (along with ed) of xmkmf and friends. It is
included in xorg-6.9's build. Again, for any other packages
I haven't looked into sound much. If I can get a CD to play or a sound
file to play, that is about the extent of what I've tried to do.
Tonight I was looking at NAS (Network Audio System) and saw that it had
a server. I know that JACK also has a server. There is also MAS (Media
Application
Randy McMurchy([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Tue, May 09, 2006 at 08:25:54PM -0500:
I went 6.9.0. Why do the hard to get the same as the easy? Don't
take this the wrong way, but at this point installing 7.0 is just
plain dumb, or one is a glutton for punishment, or one is getting
his scripts in order.
Bruce Dubbs([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Tue, May 09, 2006 at 11:13:56PM -0500:
Tushar Teredesai wrote:
Hi:
For vim, is there any reason for not mentioning the optional gtk1
dependency?
Don't know. Does that apply to vim7?
Yes you can still link vim-7 against gtk1,but the question is.
Do we
On 5/9/06, DJ Lucas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Identical patch was the result and has already been tested in xorg7
builds. Will be comitted with some xorg7 fixes shortly.
Thanks, DJ. The excrement hit the air flow device at work this week,
and Saturday is pretty tied up for me, too. I should
On 5/10/06, Ag Hatzimanikas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes you can still link vim-7 against gtk1,but the question is.
Do we really need this,as I am under the impression that we want
to drom gtk1 from the Book (I could be wrong though).
To be technically correct, we have to list *all* optional
Randy McMurchy wrote:
Hi all,
Would there be any objection to changing the BLFS name of TeX to what
the package should actually be referenced as - teTeX.
No, but the introduction needs to change too.
teTeX is an implementation on Donald Knuth's TeX typesetting program.
This package is able
Ag Hatzimanikas wrote:
Randy McMurchy([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Tue, May 09, 2006 at 08:25:54PM -0500:
I went 6.9.0. Why do the hard to get the same as the easy? Don't
take this the wrong way, but at this point installing 7.0 is just
plain dumb, or one is a glutton for punishment, or one is getting
Has anyone tested against XFree86? I haven't. Xorg-6.9.0 is fine with
the new Mesa (it's only a tiny version change, I still tested), but I
don't know about XFree86-4.5.0. Also, what version ships with 4.6.0?
That dep was changed when the instructions were still in my homedirI
never
