Changes (by [EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Updated BLFS to PCRE-7.0
Hmmm, this version is failing the test suite for me.. specifically
pcregrep. Anyone else seeing this?
Regards
Greg
--
http://www.diy-linux.org/
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ:
Greg Schafer wrote these words on 02/16/07 02:40 CST:
Changes (by [EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Updated BLFS to PCRE-7.0
Hmmm, this version is failing the test suite for me.. specifically
pcregrep. Anyone else seeing this?
I don't see the test specifically failing, but I don't see the Ok
after the
Greg Schafer wrote these words on 02/16/07 02:50 CST:
Wouldn't it be wise to document the fact that the test failure is
expected? (They purposely changed the program's behavior but failed to
adjust the test suite). I'm not sure if there is a current BLFS policy for
failing test suites.
There
Hi all,
In the Trac ticket for the Python-2.5 update, Matt claims to get
testsuite failures, however, the tests in my installation were perfect.
Best I can tell, most of the major players in the Open Source world,
have made updates to support Python-2.5. We've got to decide how to
go forward
Nathan Coulson wrote these words on 02/15/07 23:29 CST:
On 2/15/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Updated to libpng-1.2.16
There is no libpng.txt in this tarball, but there is a libpng-1.2.16.txt.
Thanks, Nathon. I must confess that I build libpng in chroot, and did
not update
On 2/16/07, Randy McMurchy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the Trac ticket for the Python-2.5 update, Matt claims to get
testsuite failures, however, the tests in my installation were perfect.
Tests came out fine for me. A bunch skipped, but no errors.
I suppose each package will need to be
Hi all,
Mostly a note for the archives, but the libxml2 testsuite acted funny
on me during a recent install (LFS-SVN-20070210). Instead of using
hundreds of MB of disk, it only used 25. Looking at the issue, the
new tar command requires --wildcards passed if you have pattern
matching in the file
Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 02/16/07 09:40 CST:
One thing. Jürg has a patch in Paldo that would affect how external
Python modules using distutils (i.e., setup.py) are built.
http://www.paldo.org/paldo/sources/Python/Python-2.5-build-fix-1.patch.bz2
I am leaving for a few days, and
-Original Message-
From: Äåì÷åíêîâ Àðòóð Ïåòðîâè÷ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 4:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Some issues in BLFS
Here're some issues of current development version of BLFS book that I
found:
Chapter 25. X Window System Environment
X
Randy McMurchy wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Äåì÷åíêîâ Àðòóð Ïåòðîâè÷ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Snip
I think it should be something like this (look at - xkb -):
mkdir $XORG_PREFIX/lib/X11/twm
ln -svt /etc/X11 \
$XORG_PREFIX/lib/X11/{twm,fs,lbxproxy,proxymngr} \
On 2/16/07, DJ Lucas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Randy McMurchy wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Демченков Артур Петрович [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Snip
I think it should be something like this (look at - xkb -):
mkdir $XORG_PREFIX/lib/X11/twm
ln -svt /etc/X11 \
On 2/16/07, BLFS Trac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Updated BLFS to PCI Utilities-2.2.4. Also added a note about linking
the Zlib library to packages that may need to link to libpci.a.
Randy, I don't know if this is a good idea yet. This will cause
problems with HAL because it doesn't use libpci.
Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 02/16/07 18:37 CST:
On 2/16/07, BLFS Trac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Updated BLFS to PCI Utilities-2.2.4. Also added a note about linking
the Zlib library to packages that may need to link to libpci.a.
Randy, I don't know if this is a good idea yet. This
On 2/16/07, Randy McMurchy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 02/16/07 18:37 CST:
So, in the best case, you have an old pci.ids hanging around that HAL
is going to use. In the worst case, you only have pci.ids.gz and HAL
will bomb.
Good point. However, going on
14 matches
Mail list logo
