I mentioned before that I dislike sourceforge. I just had another
instance as to why. I was updating the master files repository with
virtuoso-opensource-6.1.6.tar.gz. That's about 115 MB. The download
speed was generally less than 200 KB/sec. Sometimes as low as 15
KB/sec. In this case,
I noticed that there is a part which is missing from the dependency list of
xfce4-power-manager package.
UPower is needed for the run time.
It would be helpful to mention it.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Kenno Han wrote:
I noticed that there is a part which is missing from the dependency list of
xfce4-power-manager package.
UPower is needed for the run time.
It would be helpful to mention it.
Yes, I'll be doing a revalidation of xfce in the next few days to try to
get these types of
On 9/12/2012 11:30 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
I'd like to request that editors try to find alternative sites to
sourceforge. If that's the only site available, please offer anduin as
an alternate source.
The only problem with that is everyone (including editors) do not know
where the main hosting
On 12.09.2012 18:30, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
I mentioned before that I dislike sourceforge. I just had another
instance as to why. I was updating the master files repository with
virtuoso-opensource-6.1.6.tar.gz. That's about 115 MB. The download
speed was generally less than 200 KB/sec.
On Wed, 2012-09-12 at 16:29 -0500, Randy McMurchy wrote:
On 9/12/2012 11:30 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
I'd like to request that editors try to find alternative sites to
sourceforge. If that's the only site available, please offer anduin as
an alternate source.
The only problem with that is
Matt Burgess wrote:
On Wed, 2012-09-12 at 16:29 -0500, Randy McMurchy wrote:
On 9/12/2012 11:30 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
I'd like to request that editors try to find alternative sites to
sourceforge. If that's the only site available, please offer anduin as
an alternate source.
The only
Dana 11.9.2012 23:14, Bruce Dubbs je napisao:
I'm not sure about that. My monitor on my development system is
1366x768. I don't think vesa supports that resolution.
-- Bruce
I don't think it's really worth adding if that's the only feature that
it supports over VESA. But as I already
Dana 11.9.2012 18:42, k...@linuxfromscratch.org je napisao:
Author: ken
Date: 2012-09-11 10:42:11 -0600 (Tue, 11 Sep 2012)
New Revision: 10651
@@ -79,6 +79,12 @@
para
Required patch:
ulink
url=patch-root;/transcode-transcode-version;-ffmpeg-1.patch/
+
Armin K. wrote:
Dana 11.9.2012 23:14, Bruce Dubbs je napisao:
I'm not sure about that. My monitor on my development system is
1366x768. I don't think vesa supports that resolution.
-- Bruce
I don't think it's really worth adding if that's the only feature that
it supports over
Armin K. wrote:
Dana 11.9.2012 18:42, k...@linuxfromscratch.org je napisao:
Author: ken
Date: 2012-09-11 10:42:11 -0600 (Tue, 11 Sep 2012)
New Revision: 10651
@@ -79,6 +79,12 @@
para
Required patch:
ulink
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 08:12:56PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Ken Moffat wrote:
[...]
I'm sorry to hear this but I also understand. All that you have done is
much appreciated as will anything you may choose to do in the future.
We each have to judge the amount of effort we put into
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 07:24:15PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Armin K. wrote:
Dana 11.9.2012 18:42, k...@linuxfromscratch.org je napisao:
Author: ken
Date: 2012-09-11 10:42:11 -0600 (Tue, 11 Sep 2012)
New Revision: 10651
@@ -79,6 +79,12 @@
para
Required
13 matches
Mail list logo