On 02/21/14 13:20, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Armin K. wrote:
I know what you meant. I have no problems with shipping package specific
notes for now. Maintaining seperate BLFS is something I can't do alone
and maintaining same instructions in one branch, then generating two
different books is
Hi,
ed has just been archived, arguing that it is no more in LSB. However, FYI, it
is still mentioned in table 17-1 of Linux Standard Base Core Specification
4.90-20140214, but not on the detailed list in section 17.2. Same for a few
others (pax for example). I do not know whether it is the table
Le 22/02/2014 09:59, DJ Lucas a écrit :
On 02/21/14 13:20, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Armin K. wrote:
I know what you meant. I have no problems with shipping package specific
notes for now. Maintaining seperate BLFS is something I can't do alone
and maintaining same instructions in one branch,
Em 22-02-2014 09:52, Pierre Labastie escreveu:
Hi,
ed has just been archived, arguing that it is no more in LSB. However, FYI, it
is still mentioned in table 17-1 of Linux Standard Base Core Specification
4.90-20140214, but not on the detailed list in section 17.2. Same for a few
others
On 02/22/2014 01:57 PM, Pierre Labastie wrote:
Le 22/02/2014 09:59, DJ Lucas a écrit :
On 02/21/14 13:20, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Armin K. wrote:
I know what you meant. I have no problems with shipping package specific
notes for now. Maintaining seperate BLFS is something I can't do alone
and
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 14:20:08 +0100
From: Armin K. kre...@email.com
To: BLFS Development List blfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org
Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] BLFS Systemd Additions
.
.
There are different ways than with playing with xsl (shell subsitutions
and such, generating .xml
Em 22-02-2014 00:47, Bruce Dubbs escreveu:
Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
Em 22-02-2014 00:19, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu:
I will do tomorrow, because I am too tired.
By do tomorrow, I mean: I will commit tomorrow.
OK, I'll quit for now, but I will make a last commit. Feel free to
Pierre Labastie wrote:
Le 22/02/2014 09:59, DJ Lucas a écrit :
On 02/21/14 13:20, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Armin K. wrote:
I know what you meant. I have no problems with shipping package specific
notes for now. Maintaining seperate BLFS is something I can't do alone
and maintaining same
Armin K. wrote:
There are different ways than with playing with xsl (shell subsitutions
and such, generating .xml files from .xml.in files using templates) but
given that some already say that they wouldn't like systemd and sysv
instructions in the same repository, I didn't speak up. As for
On 02/22/14 11:29, DJ Lucas wrote:
Profiling is really what we are looking for, and we already have the
functionality for two pass profiling in our Makefile for BLFS. See the
attached patch.
Oh, I forgot to mention, I didn't check to see if bind includes a unit
file, it was just used as
On 02/21/2014 10:06 PM, Armin K. wrote:
On 02/19/2014 07:01 PM, Armin K. wrote:
FYI, I'll be building anything that has an init script in blfs in order
to provide the same for systemd, and doing so I can correct something
and/or mark them as checked.
This should be final one from me for
Le 22/02/2014 18:56, Armin K. a écrit :
On 02/21/2014 10:06 PM, Armin K. wrote:
On 02/19/2014 07:01 PM, Armin K. wrote:
FYI, I'll be building anything that has an init script in blfs in order
to provide the same for systemd, and doing so I can correct something
and/or mark them as checked.
Although it is not very active (sorry DJ and Dan, I know you contributed to
this), initd-tools is versioned, while the title of the page in BLFS does not
mention the version. The current title is LSB Tools for managing
bootscripts. I propose to rename it to Initd-tools-initd-tools-version;.
Is
If nobody wants to do, I will start tomorrow afternoon building:
Xulrunner-27.0.1
SeaMonkey-2.24
JUnit-4.11
OpenJDK-1.7.0.51/IcedTea-2.4.5
IcedTea-Web-1.4.2
--
[]s,
Fernando
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe:
Le 22/02/2014 13:52, Pierre Labastie a écrit :
Hi,
ed has just been archived, arguing that it is no more in LSB. However, FYI, it
is still mentioned in table 17-1 of Linux Standard Base Core Specification
4.90-20140214, but not on the detailed list in section 17.2. Same for a few
others
Pierre Labastie wrote:
Although it is not very active (sorry DJ and Dan, I know you contributed to
this), initd-tools is versioned, while the title of the page in BLFS does not
mention the version. The current title is LSB Tools for managing
bootscripts. I propose to rename it to
Pierre Labastie wrote:
Le 22/02/2014 13:52, Pierre Labastie a écrit :
Hi,
ed has just been archived, arguing that it is no more in LSB. However, FYI,
it
is still mentioned in table 17-1 of Linux Standard Base Core Specification
4.90-20140214, but not on the detailed list in section 17.2.
I finished tagging the Post LFS Configuration and Extra Software
chapters in the book. The next part is General Libraries and Utilities.
The remaining packages in that part needing to be tested are below. I
will start on those tomorrow. If you want to do some of these, let me
know so we
18 matches
Mail list logo
