On 02/22/2014 01:57 PM, Pierre Labastie wrote: > Le 22/02/2014 09:59, DJ Lucas a écrit : >> >> On 02/21/14 13:20, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >>> Armin K. wrote: >>> >>>> I know what you meant. I have no problems with shipping package specific >>>> notes for now. Maintaining seperate BLFS is something I can't do alone >>>> and maintaining same instructions in one branch, then generating two >>>> different books is something I don't know a) to do b) if it's possible. >>> a. Can be cured. >>> b. Yes, it's possible. >> Though I've never messed with it, it really doesn't look too difficult. >> Lookup use of <xsl:when>. Since this direction interests me, I'll take a >> look maybe next week. >> >> --DJ >> > I can help with the xsl, and there is already some knowledge about "variable" > books in the CLFS community, but I am somewhat worried that if we take this > direction, all the BLFS editors will have to cope with both sets (systemd and > sysvinit) of instructions. > > Pierre >
There are different ways than with playing with xsl (shell subsitutions and such, generating .xml files from .xml.in files using templates) but given that some already say that they wouldn't like systemd and sysv instructions in the same repository, I didn't speak up. As for maintenance, it would be still the same. systemd specific instructions are mostly related to bootscript part in more than 70% of the packages anyways so that wouldn't need to be touched for the time being. -- Note: My last name is not Krejzi. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
