Archaic wrote:
DJ, could you add the patches to the patches project repository, too
please?
Done.
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
DJ Lucas wrote:
DJ Lucas wrote:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=40937
And yes the doublefree patch works. But I forgot to update the build
size and times...so guess what?!?! Yes another complete @$%^%$ build.
;-) Update coming soon. Robert, you might want to put
Archaic wrote:
On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 04:12:56AM -0500, DJ Lucas wrote:
As if it weren't obvious, JDK is in..along with changes for FOP and
OpenOffice. And new patches in the patch archive. Two checkins were
too large...one patchset and one book change. ;-) Please beat them up
when you have
DJ Lucas wrote:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=40937
And yes the doublefree patch works. But I forgot to update the build
size and times...so guess what?!?! Yes another complete @$%^%$ build.
;-) Update coming soon. Robert, you might want to put that patch in
place
Robert Connolly wrote:
BTW, the md5sum from the blfs repo and anduin for
OOo_1.1.4-jdk_1.5.0_fix-1.patch do not match. The date/timestamp in the diff
is different, that's all.
robert
On it. Thanks for all the assistance. :-)
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo
Robert Connolly wrote:
On April 27, 2005 12:20 am, DJ Lucas wrote:
Robert, please also see the thread 'OpenOffice bug in BZ' for
an additional patch.
I found openoffice.org-1.9.69.doublefree.patch and renamed it to
OOo_1.1.4-doublefree.patch so the blfs instructions should work
DJ Lucas wrote:
Also checking berkelydb now since I had no idea whether the problem
still exists.
Just checking back, but no change necessary to db except that passing
LIBSO_LIBS and LIBXSO_LIBS to make is no longer necessary.
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo
times before,
but I can't place it and it was not in the usual places on my system.
Comments are greatly appreciated.
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
back to yas. I just wanted to bring it up so I don't forget about
it again.
Thanks.
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
DJ Lucas wrote:
Might consider putting these symlinks in as I
think gaim used them too,
Them being only nss/*.h
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Randy McMurchy wrote:
DJ Lucas wrote these words on 04/15/05 17:02 CST:
Yes, I believe I should have rephased that question a bit to say 'why
the rush?' The above answer should stand to answer either, however,
gcc-3.3 is not required as long as gcc is not 3.4.0 or 3.4.1, though I'd
like
DJ Lucas wrote:
actually I think the
majority of projects (baring OOo for now) should be able to be built
with the option '-source 1.4' passed to javac...
looks like a sed to solenv/inc/settings.mk should be able to solve this.
sed -i [EMAIL PROTECTED]@JAVAC=javac -source 1.3@ solenv/inc
. I'll grab a snap
tonight and see if I can get passed the ant failures tomorrow, I'll also
take a quick peek at fop now that I have a fresh and clean java
environment to work with.
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
How about this: Add a page with limited discussion and add the links to
the other pages. Then we can expand the configuration page as desired
without affecting other pages.
Added preliminary page in 3709/3710 :-)
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman
Sorry, for the late reply...I left it saved in drafts...
-- DJ Lucas
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
DJ Lucas wrote:
Yes it has. It's something I have wanted to add for a while. I'd also
like to add some more on X resources, but that is beyond what we've been
discussion.
How about this: Add
Randy McMurchy wrote:
DJ Lucas wrote these words on 04/07/05 23:32 CST:
Good plan considering that we don't mention details of xorg.conf or
XF86config at all. May I suggest this one:
http://www.xfree86.org/current/mouse.html
It even goes into detail for multiple scroll wheels
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
DJ Lucas wrote:
or just give the links in the Additional Configuration section.
I think that'll work well.
If you want to do this, I believe an additional section between XFree86
and X Window System Components would be apropriate and links in both the
Xorg and XFree
.
Good plan considering that we don't mention details of xorg.conf or
XF86config at all. May I suggest this one:
http://www.xfree86.org/current/mouse.html
It even goes into detail for multiple scroll wheels or the rocking
scroll wheel found on the newer MS mice.
-- DJ Lucas
--
http
on the 6.0 branch or on head. If you are
working on post 6.0 work, then stick with what you have. Just do an
'svn up, ci, etc.' as usual.
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
?
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
tonight if you don't get it first.
Thanks.
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
command below automates this).
IMO, this should just be explained in the command explanations.
Something to the effect of:
'yes | make config - ...this is usually fineyou can optionally
run make config by itself for more control over the options.'
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org
901 - 922 of 922 matches
Mail list logo
