On 02/21/2014 10:12 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 08:51:55AM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
>>> Em 20-02-2014 23:00, LFS Trac escreveu:
#3505: linux-3.13.4
--+
Reporter: bdubbs@… | Owner:
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 08:51:55AM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
> > Em 20-02-2014 23:00, LFS Trac escreveu:
> >> #3505: linux-3.13.4
> >> --+
> >> Reporter: bdubbs@… | Owner: lfs-book@…
> >> Type: task |
On 02/21/2014 06:02 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Armin K. wrote:
>>
>>>We can do this for 7.5. The rule here is that we can update point
>>>versions but not major or minor versions.
>>
>> Couldn't it be the same for blfs, for almost all packages?
>
>>>
On 02/21/2014 06:05 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Armin K. wrote:
>
>> I believe we need a policy to exactly define what exactly "package
>> freeze" means.
>
> It means don't upgrade a package unless we talk it over and agree that
> it can be upgraded without creating additional work during the relea
Armin K. wrote:
> I believe we need a policy to exactly define what exactly "package
> freeze" means.
It means don't upgrade a package unless we talk it over and agree that
it can be upgraded without creating additional work during the release
testing period.
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfrom
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Armin K. wrote:
>
>>We can do this for 7.5. The rule here is that we can update point
>>versions but not major or minor versions.
>
> Couldn't it be the same for blfs, for almost all packages?
That's worthy of discussion. Perhaps end packages
On 02/21/2014 05:44 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Armin K. wrote:
>
>>We can do this for 7.5. The rule here is that we can update point
>>versions but not major or minor versions.
>
> Couldn't it be the same for blfs, for almost all packages?
That's worthy of discussi
Armin K. wrote:
>We can do this for 7.5. The rule here is that we can update point
>versions but not major or minor versions.
Couldn't it be the same for blfs, for almost all packages?
>>>
>>> That's worthy of discussion. Perhaps end packages and not libraries
>>> would
On 02/21/2014 05:29 PM, Armin K. wrote:
> On 02/21/2014 03:51 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
>>> Em 20-02-2014 23:00, LFS Trac escreveu:
#3505: linux-3.13.4
--+
Reporter: bdubbs@… | Owner: lfs-book@…
On 02/21/2014 03:51 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
>> Em 20-02-2014 23:00, LFS Trac escreveu:
>>> #3505: linux-3.13.4
>>> --+
>>> Reporter: bdubbs@… | Owner: lfs-book@…
>>> Type: task | Status: new
>>> Pr
Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
> Em 20-02-2014 23:00, LFS Trac escreveu:
>> #3505: linux-3.13.4
>> --+
>> Reporter: bdubbs@… | Owner: lfs-book@…
>> Type: task | Status: new
>> Priority: normal| Milestone: 7.5
>> Component:
Em 20-02-2014 23:00, LFS Trac escreveu:
> #3505: linux-3.13.4
> --+
> Reporter: bdubbs@… | Owner: lfs-book@…
> Type: task | Status: new
> Priority: normal| Milestone: 7.5
> Component: Book |Version: SVN
> Sever
12 matches
Mail list logo
