Re: Former Xorg items

2006-05-17 Thread TheOldFellow
Bruce Dubbs wrote: BTW, you seem to always pick the hard things: Java, OO, Xorg7. I appreciate what you do. and he ain't the only one. R. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: Former Xorg items

2006-05-17 Thread Ag Hatzimanikas
TheOldFellow([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Wed, May 17, 2006 at 08:30:02AM +0100: Bruce Dubbs wrote: BTW, you seem to always pick the hard things: Java, OO, Xorg7. I appreciate what you do. and he ain't the only one. R. Richard stop spamming the list :) By the way,of course he ain't the only

Former Xorg items

2006-05-16 Thread DJ Lucas
Hi guys. I wanted to ask a question about policy. It's only one package that I know of, and most probably is only one, but I haven't checked lesstif yet. I was thinking about adding rman as a required dependency for NAS, rather than wraping it with 'if you've installed xorg 7', and then

Re: Former Xorg items

2006-05-16 Thread Randy McMurchy
DJ Lucas wrote these words on 05/16/06 20:16 CST: I was thinking about adding rman as a required dependency for NAS, rather than wraping it with 'if you've installed xorg 7', and then adding a note at the top of rman page that says it's already installed if you've installed Xorg6 or

Re: Former Xorg items

2006-05-16 Thread DJ Lucas
Randy McMurchy wrote: Sorry for being so candid, but I believe that is what you were asking for. I just hope others contribute as well. If I'm wrong and the entire community disagrees with me, then great. At least we have a consensus. Right now, it seems only you and I have contributed to the

Re: Former Xorg items

2006-05-16 Thread Bruce Dubbs
DJ Lucas wrote: Randy McMurchy wrote: Sorry for being so candid, but I believe that is what you were asking for. I just hope others contribute as well. If I'm wrong and the entire community disagrees with me, then great. At least we have a consensus. Right now, it seems only you and I have

Re: Former Xorg items

2006-05-16 Thread DJ Lucas
Bruce Dubbs wrote: I don't have any problems with what you are saying. I don't agree that it is changing the organization of the book. It is all a part of xorg7 and keeping that together makes sense. When doing something like this, don't be afraid of doing something different. If it's a