On Wednesday 10 November 2010 07:33:02 DJ Lucas wrote:
...
I've been using Dovecot for quite a while and am quite happy with it.
Been meaning to add it to the book but not on the priority list ATM. Not
sure how Courier-IMAP stacks up (esp for 995) but it is still pretty
popular following
On Nov 10, 2010, at 1:33 AM, DJ Lucas d...@linuxfromscratch.org wrote:
I've been using Dovecot for quite a while and am quite happy with it.
Ditto. Dovecot surprised me, probably because of the headache involved with
other implementations I tried. It's flexible, reliable, and super easy to
I'm looking at some of the less commonly used packages in BLFS (for
openssl-1.0.0a), of which I think qpopper is one. At some point in
the not-so-recent past, glibc (2.10.1, apparently - May 2009 )
started defining getline unconditionally (I thought it added it, but
a debian bug report says it
Ken Moffat wrote these words on 11/09/10 14:27 CST:
I'm looking at some of the less commonly used packages in BLFS (for
openssl-1.0.0a), of which I think qpopper is one.
I have never built nor used that package. If nobody can provide a sound
reason to keep it, I am in favor of its demise.
--
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 7:11 PM, Randy McMurchy
ra...@linuxfromscratch.org wrote:
I have never built nor used that package. If nobody can provide a sound
reason to keep it, I am in favor of its demise.
I haven't really used it either, but I would like to see Courier-IMAP
reintroduced in Qpopler's
Randy McMurchy wrote:
Ken Moffat wrote these words on 11/09/10 14:27 CST:
I'm looking at some of the less commonly used packages in BLFS (for
openssl-1.0.0a), of which I think qpopper is one.
I have never built nor used that package. If nobody can provide a sound
reason to keep it, I am in
On 11/09/2010 10:06 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Randy McMurchy wrote:
Ken Moffat wrote these words on 11/09/10 14:27 CST:
I'm looking at some of the less commonly used packages in BLFS (for
openssl-1.0.0a), of which I think qpopper is one.
I have never built nor used that package. If nobody can
