Re: [blfs-dev] GCC-4.8.2 and bootstrap, uncertain instructions

2014-02-18 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 18/02/2014 05:10, Armin K. a écrit : In BLFS, GCC-4.8.2 page has the following: The instructions below let the build machinery perform a “bootstrap” intentionally. This is necessary if you install the Ada compiler anyway. Even if you don't, a bootstrap is recommended for robustness.

[blfs-dev] Some notes, when building/tagging (B)LFS-7.5-rc1

2014-02-18 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Some notes and questions, from the work yesterday. 1. At Count Me http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/cgi-bin/lfscounter.php No tag for 7.5-rc1. 2. Problem with Valgrind (not in the book, but used in many tests) checking the GLIBC_VERSION version... unsupported version 2.19 configure: error:

Re: [blfs-dev] GCC-4.8.2 and bootstrap, uncertain instructions

2014-02-18 Thread Armin K.
On 02/18/2014 10:18 AM, Pierre Labastie wrote: Le 18/02/2014 05:10, Armin K. a écrit : In BLFS, GCC-4.8.2 page has the following: The instructions below let the build machinery perform a “bootstrap” intentionally. This is necessary if you install the Ada compiler anyway. Even if you don't,

Re: [blfs-dev] Some notes, when building/tagging (B)LFS-7.5-rc1

2014-02-18 Thread Armin K.
On 02/18/2014 11:37 AM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: Some notes and questions, from the work yesterday. 1. At Count Me http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/cgi-bin/lfscounter.php No tag for 7.5-rc1. 2. Problem with Valgrind (not in the book, but used in many tests) checking the

Re: [blfs-dev] GCC-4.8.2 and bootstrap, uncertain instructions

2014-02-18 Thread Armin K.
On 02/18/2014 01:47 PM, Armin K. wrote: On 02/18/2014 10:18 AM, Pierre Labastie wrote: Le 18/02/2014 05:10, Armin K. a écrit : In BLFS, GCC-4.8.2 page has the following: The instructions below let the build machinery perform a “bootstrap” intentionally. This is necessary if you install the

Re: [blfs-dev] Some notes, when building/tagging (B)LFS-7.5-rc1

2014-02-18 Thread Armin K.
On 02/18/2014 02:14 PM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: Em 18-02-2014 09:49, Armin K. escreveu: On 02/18/2014 11:37 AM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: Some notes and questions, from the work yesterday. 1. At Count Me http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/cgi-bin/lfscounter.php No tag for 7.5-rc1.

Re: [blfs-dev] Some notes, when building/tagging (B)LFS-7.5-rc1

2014-02-18 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Em 18-02-2014 10:47, Armin K. escreveu: On 02/18/2014 02:14 PM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: Em 18-02-2014 09:49, Armin K. escreveu: On 02/18/2014 11:37 AM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: 3. fcron-3.1.2 checking Looking for docbook2man-spec file... default checking Looking for dsssl

Re: [blfs-dev] Some notes, when building/tagging (B)LFS-7.5-rc1

2014-02-18 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Fernando de Oliveira wrote: Some notes and questions, from the work yesterday. 1. At Count Me http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/cgi-bin/lfscounter.php No tag for 7.5-rc1. Fixed. 2. Problem with Valgrind (not in the book, but used in many tests) checking the GLIBC_VERSION version...

[blfs-dev] D-Bus testsuite requires pygobject

2014-02-18 Thread Armin K.
configure: Full test coverage (--enable-tests=yes) requires Python, dbus-python, pygobject checking for a Python interpreter with version = 2.6... python checking for python... /usr/bin/python checking for python version... 2.7 checking for python platform... linux2 checking for python script

Re: [blfs-dev] D-Bus testsuite requires pygobject

2014-02-18 Thread Armin K.
On 02/18/2014 05:48 PM, Armin K. wrote: configure: Full test coverage (--enable-tests=yes) requires Python, dbus-python, pygobject checking for a Python interpreter with version = 2.6... python checking for python... /usr/bin/python checking for python version... 2.7 checking for python

Re: [blfs-dev] D-Bus testsuite requires pygobject

2014-02-18 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Em 18-02-2014 14:01, Armin K. escreveu: On 02/18/2014 05:48 PM, Armin K. wrote: configure: Full test coverage (--enable-tests=yes) requires Python, dbus-python, pygobject checking for a Python interpreter with version = 2.6... python checking for python... /usr/bin/python checking for

[blfs-dev] My BLFS checks

2014-02-18 Thread Armin K.
Hi, I have finished building the part of BLFS I required to get full build from the systemd source package and have also updated gcc-4.8.2 instructions. The attached patch contains changes I made. I only ask the patch to be applied without any changes and then the changes can be made later if

Re: [blfs-dev] My BLFS checks

2014-02-18 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Em 18-02-2014 14:29, Armin K. escreveu: Hi, I have finished building the part of BLFS I required to get full build from the systemd source package and have also updated gcc-4.8.2 instructions. The attached patch contains changes I made. I only ask the patch to be applied without any changes

Re: [blfs-dev] My BLFS checks

2014-02-18 Thread Armin K.
On 02/18/2014 06:38 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: Armin K. wrote: Hi, I have finished building the part of BLFS I required to get full build from the systemd source package and have also updated gcc-4.8.2 instructions. The attached patch contains changes I made. I only ask the patch to be applied

Re: [blfs-dev] My BLFS checks

2014-02-18 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Armin K. wrote: Hi, I have finished building the part of BLFS I required to get full build from the systemd source package and have also updated gcc-4.8.2 instructions. The attached patch contains changes I made. I only ask the patch to be applied without any changes and then the changes can

Re: [blfs-dev] My BLFS checks

2014-02-18 Thread Armin K.
On 02/18/2014 06:29 PM, Armin K. wrote: Hi, I have finished building the part of BLFS I required to get full build from the systemd source package and have also updated gcc-4.8.2 instructions. The attached patch contains changes I made. I only ask the patch to be applied without any changes

Re: [blfs-dev] My BLFS checks

2014-02-18 Thread akhiezer
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 18:29:50 +0100 From: Armin K. kre...@email.com To: BLFS Development List blfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org Subject: [blfs-dev] My BLFS checks . . The attached patch contains changes I made. I only ask the patch to be applied without any changes and then

Re: [blfs-dev] My BLFS checks

2014-02-18 Thread Armin K.
On 02/18/2014 07:28 PM, akhiezer wrote: Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 18:29:50 +0100 From: Armin K. kre...@email.com To: BLFS Development List blfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org Subject: [blfs-dev] My BLFS checks . . The attached patch contains changes I made. I only ask the patch to be

Re: [blfs-dev] My BLFS checks

2014-02-18 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Em 18-02-2014 15:47, Armin K. escreveu: On 02/18/2014 06:29 PM, Armin K. wrote: Hi, I have finished building the part of BLFS I required to get full build from the systemd source package and have also updated gcc-4.8.2 instructions. The attached patch contains changes I made. I only ask the

Re: [blfs-dev] My BLFS checks

2014-02-18 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Em 18-02-2014 15:44, Armin K. escreveu: On 02/18/2014 07:28 PM, akhiezer wrote: Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 18:29:50 +0100 From: Armin K. kre...@email.com To: BLFS Development List blfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org Subject: [blfs-dev] My BLFS checks . . The attached patch contains

[blfs-dev] dbus-1.8.0 and xmlto-0.0.25

2014-02-18 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Sending again. Title was wrong, I had solved my problem. I think this sentence is wrong: Note that the configure script will look for xmlto-0.0.25 but it does nothing as the XML/HTML documentation is already shipped in the source tree. If there is no xmlto installed: $ xzgrep xmlto

Re: [blfs-dev] dbus-1.8.0 and xmlto-0.0.25

2014-02-18 Thread Armin K.
On 02/18/2014 11:20 PM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: Sending again. Title was wrong, I had solved my problem. I think this sentence is wrong: Note that the configure script will look for xmlto-0.0.25 but it does nothing as the XML/HTML documentation is already shipped in the source tree.

Re: [blfs-dev] dbus-1.8.0 and xmlto-0.0.25

2014-02-18 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Em 18-02-2014 19:27, Armin K. escreveu: On 02/18/2014 11:20 PM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: Sending again. Title was wrong, I had solved my problem. I think this sentence is wrong: Note that the configure script will look for xmlto-0.0.25 but it does nothing as the XML/HTML documentation is