[blfs-dev] openssl and web access

2012-03-06 Thread Pierre Labastie
Hi, Maybe not everybody is subscribed to lfs-dev or jhalfs-discuss, so let me introduce myself. I am a (B)LFS hobbyist, mostly interested at the moment in working on jhalfs, in order to have an automated test framework. In the course of some tests, I noticed that openssl (or gnutls) is an

Re: [blfs-dev] openssl and web access

2012-03-06 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 06/03/2012 21:57, Pierre Labastie a écrit : wget instructions are broken if they should reflect 'required+recommended' dependencies (no required/recommended dependency implies that the switch should be --without-ssl). One of you might want to fix it. I could even make a patch, but I am

[blfs-dev] pkg-config is a dependency D-Bus GLib bindings

2012-03-07 Thread Pierre Labastie
As a test of the new jhalfs/BLFS tools, I have tried to compile 'accountservice' (the first package in the book). The tool generated the following build order: dbus libffi python2 pcre glib2 dbus-glib perl-xml-parser intltool pkgconfig polkit accountsservice. Knowing that libxml2 and expat were

Re: [blfs-dev] pkg-config is a dependency D-Bus GLib bindings

2012-03-07 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 07/03/2012 18:01, Pierre Labastie a écrit : See attached patch. Forgotten, sorry. Index: blfsbook/general/sysutils/dbus-bindings.xml === --- blfsbook.orig/general/sysutils/dbus-bindings.xml 2012-02-21 17:34:42.0 +0100

Re: [blfs-dev] pkg-config is a dependency D-Bus GLib bindings

2012-03-07 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 07/03/2012 19:34, Andrew Benton a écrit : On Wed, 07 Mar 2012 18:01:32 +0100 Pierre Labastiepierre.labas...@neuf.fr wrote: As a test of the new jhalfs/BLFS tools, I have tried to compile 'accountservice' (the first package in the book). The tool generated the following build order: dbus

Re: [blfs-dev] Cleaning up the ticket system

2012-03-08 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 08/03/2012 11:45, Armin K. a écrit : On 03/08/2012 10:13 AM, Ragnar Thomsen wrote: 2653 (3 yr old): SWIG, tool for connecting programming languages with scripting languages. We need it? I asked to add cronie. But we have been over that now, you can close it. As for others, swig might

Re: [blfs-dev] libssh

2012-03-08 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 08/03/2012 15:14, Andrew Benton a écrit : On Thu, 8 Mar 2012 14:14:13 +0100 Ragnar Thomsenragnarthom...@hotmail.com wrote: Should libssh be added to the book? I can see that certain packages (cURL, kde-runtime...) can utilize it. If yes, should we include libssh or libssh2? This page

Re: [blfs-dev] Info needed.

2012-03-08 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 08/03/2012 01:42, Armin K. a écrit : libdrm is fine for now. But MesaLib has 2 drivers for nouveau, dri and gallium drivers. DRI one (nouveau_vieux.so - the one which my card uses) is not enabled by default, I'm amazed. Worked for me, and looking at configure code, I think it is enabled by

Re: [blfs-dev] Info needed.

2012-03-10 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 08/03/2012 23:49, Armin K. a écrit : I am running x86 version, and it works. But I could have sworn that nouveau_vieux_dri.so wasn't included by default unless I modified configure options. But that may be because I enabled building of gallium nouveau driver. One thing or other, It works

[blfs-dev] typo in mesalib.xml

2012-03-10 Thread Pierre Labastie
Hi, In mesalib.xml, in Command explanations, the switch `--with-gallium-driver=' should be `--with-gallium-drivers=' Regards Pierre -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: [blfs-dev] Info needed.

2012-03-10 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 10/03/2012 10:52, Pierre Labastie a écrit : Thanks for reminding me to check glxinfo. I had not compiled nouveau into the kernel... So X was using swrast. Well, actually, nouveau in the kernel has nothing to do with X. But I had also DRM disabled. Now, I enabled DRM, but X still uses swrast

Re: [blfs-dev] Initramfs issues

2012-03-14 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 14/03/2012 00:34, Bruce Dubbs a écrit : OK, try the updated scripts I just committed when you get a chance. -- Bruce Still needs the patch below (suppress lsmod from $binfiles, since it is added later if needed, and the last space for cosmetics:-) ), but it looks like it almost works (no

Re: [blfs-dev] Xorg Nouveau driver.

2012-03-17 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 17/03/2012 11:48, Armin K. a écrit : http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~krejzi/xf86-video-nouveau-0.0.16+git20120306.tar.xz md5sum: b3d85c79ae059832741828c6b38072b2 I would like from anyone of you to put it somewhere else since I was planing to add it in next Xorg revision. I never sent the

Re: [blfs-dev] Initramfs issues

2012-03-19 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 14/03/2012 00:34, Bruce Dubbs a écrit : OK, try the updated scripts I just committed when you get a chance. -- Bruce Sorry it took some time because I had a few errors in my kernel config (like not enabling devtmpfs, shame on me, and a problem with the radeon driver, which was giving a

Re: [blfs-dev] Initramfs issues

2012-03-19 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 19/03/2012 20:18, Bruce Dubbs wrote: Pierre Labastie wrote: Also, it might be interesting/necessary to copy the content of /lib/firmware to $WDIR. That directory has always been empty for me. What populates it? I've always thought of that directory to be for specialized video cards

Re: [blfs-dev] install and llvm - MesaLib-8.0.1

2012-03-20 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 19/03/2012 23:35, Armin K. a écrit : On 03/19/2012 09:25 PM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: Now, for present sublect, first, thanks for your post. I do not know much about drivers nor Mesa, but I just have built it with the following switches: ./configure --prefix=$XORG_PREFIX

[blfs-dev] Configuration in GLib should be as user root

2012-03-21 Thread Pierre Labastie
Hi, I think that the Configuration of GLib2 should be made as the root user, because it writes to the /etc/profile.d directory. It should be mentioned in the text, and the screen tag should be screen role='root'. Thanks Pierre -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ:

[blfs-dev] Udev page outdated

2012-03-23 Thread Pierre Labastie
Hi, The Udev page in BLFS should be updated to (at least) include 2 more switches in configure: --disable-introspection \ #default to enabled --with-systemdsystemunitdir=no and command explanations could be: --disable-introspection: necessary if you have not installed gobject-introspection.

[blfs-dev] notification-daemon missing dep

2012-03-23 Thread Pierre Labastie
Hi, It looks like notification daemon depends on libcanberra: configure stops if libcanberra is not installed, and I have not found any switch to disable it. Regards Pierre -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe:

Re: [blfs-dev] notification-daemon missing dep

2012-03-23 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 23/03/2012 18:01, Bruce Dubbs a écrit : Pierre, It would be preferable if you could make a ticket for these types of comments so we don't forget them. http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/report/1 Done... Sorry. Pierre -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ:

[blfs-dev] patch needed to build QT 4.8 with gcc-4.7.0

2012-04-01 Thread Pierre Labastie
Hi, Not making a ticket because gcc-4.7.0 is not supposed to be used, but a heads-up: WHen building QT 4.8 with gcc 4.7.0, you get: [...] g++ -c -pipe -Wall -Wreturn-type -fno-strict-aliasing -Wcast-align -Wchar-subscr ipts -Wformat-security -Wreturn-type -Wno-unused-parameter

[blfs-dev] Question about book formatting

2012-04-06 Thread Pierre Labastie
Hi, Additional Downloads normally begin with a bridgehead tag whose text is 'Additional Downloads'. But in two cases (openldap and gnome-games), the text is just 'Additional Download'. This is amazing in the openldap case, because there are actually 3 patches to download. Since I am trying

Re: [blfs-dev] Question about book formatting

2012-04-07 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 07/04/2012 00:00, Armin K. a écrit : OpenLDAP stuff is my fault. I upgraded it last night and didn't pay attention to that one. It should be fixed now, thanks. Thanks for the quick fix. Pierre -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ:

[blfs-dev] QT 4.8.1+GCC 4.7 still does not build with current instructions

2012-04-07 Thread Pierre Labastie
Hi, Building on my laptop with pentium-m (32 bit). It seems that the -Werror removal in the current instructions is not enough, because the Makefile's are rebuilt later. What I have done is : sed -i '/-Werror/d' src/3rdparty/webkit/Source/WebKit.pri _before_ configure And then the full build

Re: [blfs-dev] What happened to the x-setup.html page?

2012-04-08 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 08/04/2012 03:19, Bruce Dubbs a écrit : Ken Moffat wrote: On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 07:23:44PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: In mesa, I see three places that use card0. They are all of the form fd = open(/dev/dri/card0, O_RDWR); I see in rules.d/50-udev-default.rules an entry SUBSYSTEM==drm,

Re: [blfs-dev] Xorg Build Instructions

2012-04-11 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 11/04/2012 20:56, Armin K. a écrit : Hello there. I've been looking at Xorg build instructions lately. Introduction page includes little script that automates building of every package in the section. Every package section have only configure (a bit different at some stages), make and

[blfs-dev] Errors when building kderuntime with gcc-4.7+glibc-2.15

2012-04-13 Thread Pierre Labastie
Hi, Using LFS SVN (only difference is adding a switch to gcc2 configure, as described in one my posts to lfs-dev), I get an error when building kderuntime. I have built 100+ BLFS packages before (all required or recommended dependencies for kde), following exactly the book instructions (actually

Re: [blfs-dev] Errors when building kderuntime with gcc-4.7+glibc-2.15

2012-04-13 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 13/04/2012 18:29, Matt Burgess a écrit : On Fri, 2012-04-13 at 18:16 +0200, Pierre Labastie wrote: Those xdr_things are defined in librpcsvc.a, but I do not know where the clnt_things come from. I suspect all of this has something to do with a missing library (maybe libtirpc

Re: [blfs-dev] Errors when building kderuntime with gcc-4.7+glibc-2.15

2012-04-13 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 13/04/2012 21:19, Ragnar Thomsen a écrit : Hey Pierre, Unfortunately, installing libtirpc is not enough. Kde-runtime will still try to link to rpc from glibc. The attached patch should fix it though. Can you verify that kde-runtime builds with the patch and with libtirpc installed , so I

[blfs-dev] Report on building KDE (with LFS SVN)

2012-04-14 Thread Pierre Labastie
Hi, Using LFS SVN (Apr 9) and BLFS SVN (Apr 11), on a virtual machine running Debian stable 32 bits, (with a 64 bit host). Note: I add --with-native-system-header-dir=/tools/include to gcc-pass2 configure. 1) Dependencies: - soprano needs libQtDBus, which is not built if DBus is not installed

Re: [blfs-dev] Report on building KDE (with LFS SVN)

2012-04-15 Thread Pierre Labastie
Note: for running the ablfs tool, I install 11 packages (sudo, subversion, libxml2, libxslt, lynx, wget, openssl, python and dependencies). I further install ca-certificates. Then the ablfs tool finds that 123 packages have to be built for kde core. Actually, 2 packages are redundant (mysql and

[blfs-dev] intermittent failure of cmake build

2012-04-17 Thread Pierre Labastie
Hi, The following is an error, which has happened several times but not each time when building cmake (using the book instructions): - [...] make[1]: Leaving directory `/sources/cmake/cmake-2.8.7/Bootstrap.cmk' loading initial cache file

[blfs-dev] required and recommended deps of gstreamer

2012-04-22 Thread Pierre Labastie
Hi, Even after Andrew changed the dependency status of gobject-instrospection from recommended to optional in a few packages (which gave me the opportunity to look for what a PITA was :-D ), g-i is still de facto a recommended dep of gstreamer. It is now gstreamer-plugins-good, which

Re: [blfs-dev] required and recommended deps of gstreamer

2012-04-22 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 22/04/2012 19:18, Armin K. a écrit : On 04/22/2012 06:46 PM, Pierre Labastie wrote: Hi, Even after Andrew changed the dependency status of gobject-instrospection from recommended to optional in a few packages (which gave me the opportunity to look for what a PITA was :-D ), g-i is still

Re: [blfs-dev] required and recommended deps of gstreamer

2012-04-22 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 22/04/2012 22:35, Armin K. a écrit : Well, if we continue to strip down recommended deps we will break gnome automation for sure. It does not matter if g-i is recommended or optional as long as it says that it's required for gnome. Sorry for my not being clear: I suggested to add one

Re: [blfs-dev] [lfs-dev] [lfs-book] [LFS Trac] #3066: Chapter 5 ncurses fails with (old?) gpm on host

2012-04-22 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 22/04/2012 23:07, Jeremy Huntwork a écrit : Looks good, committing the change to the jh branch. Thanks Pierre. You're welcome. I take the opportunity to thank you, all the editors of those wonderfull books (lfs and blfs). I really enjoy interacting with you. You're reactive, knowlegeable and

Re: [blfs-dev] GNOME 3.4 Finished

2012-05-02 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 01/05/2012 16:31, Armin K. a écrit : Today I've finished updating and checking all of Gnome 3.4 components and everything was ok. It's up to you people to test it and find bugs in the book/instructions or the packages itself. I'll be updating it to newer version when it's done. After that

Re: [blfs-dev] GNOME 3.4 Finished

2012-05-03 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 02/05/2012 20:52, Armin K. a écrit : Thanks for the report. I've added GConf into Required if building GNOME section for libcanberra. I've also recommended vala to GNOME packages where it was optional and also added correct switches to explicitly enable vala for some packages that have

[blfs-dev] g-ir-scanner and cairo

2012-05-07 Thread Pierre Labastie
Hi, A few packages in the gnome chapter fail to build when issuing g-ir-scanner commands. The reason is they have #include cairo.h directives in header files, and cairo.h is in /usr/include/cairo. While it is not a problem with compilation commands, which use -I/usr/include/cairo, that switch is

[blfs-dev] One FOP test fails with icedtea6-bin

2012-05-08 Thread Pierre Labastie
Hi, The more I try to test GNOME, the less I am able to do that... Since I had to rebuild everything from scratch, I installed icedtea instead of jdk (gone frome the book). I believed that icedtea6-bin would be enough, so I did not try to install from source. Then during the tests of FOP, I

[blfs-dev] xulrunner is required for icedtea source build

2012-05-08 Thread Pierre Labastie
According to the book, xulrunner is required for icedtea source build. But it is not in the book anymore. According to the policy of having required deps in the book, shouldn't xulrunner be put back? Pierre -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ:

Re: [blfs-dev] xulrunner is required for icedtea source build

2012-05-08 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 08/05/2012 14:13, Andrew Benton a écrit : On Tue, 08 May 2012 12:50:03 +0100 Pierre Labastiepierre.labas...@neuf.fr wrote: According to the book, xulrunner is required for icedtea source build. But it is not in the book anymore. According to the policy of having required deps in the

Re: [blfs-dev] book status

2012-05-11 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 11/05/2012 18:43, Bruce Dubbs a écrit : Fernando de Oliveira wrote: On 11-05-2012 12:23, Armin K. wrote: On 05/11/2012 12:47 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: These can be removed if no one uses them iced-tea-web avifile I use icedtea, just waiting for the new version. iced-tea-web is not

Re: [blfs-dev] g-ir-scanner and cairo

2012-05-11 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 09/05/2012 22:54, Pierre Labastie a écrit : Le 07/05/2012 18:00, Ken Moffat a écrit : In my case I build dbus, cairo, gtk-doc, dbus-glib, ..., gobject-introspection in that order, followed by pango, atk, shared-mime-info, cups, gdk-pixbuf, gtk2, gtk3. I don't imagine that variations

[blfs-dev] Report on building GNOME

2012-05-15 Thread Pierre Labastie
Hi, I have built GNOME according to the book instruction of May 13. It went rather smoothly (but lenghty). Here is my report. Many of the observations are only typos, and often, they are about a non GNOME package. Typos: - libsoup page : in command explanations, first line : specific

Re: [blfs-dev] firefox translations

2012-06-18 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 18/06/2012 17:54, Fernando de Oliveira a écrit : Please, how do you access about:config in thunderbird to change general.useragent.locale, without specific add-ons? I think you can find it in preferencesadvancedconfiguration editor. That's how it is under Debian (translated from French).

Re: [blfs-dev] Higgs Syncronization

2013-01-24 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 24/01/2013 14:06, Randy McMurchy a écrit : On 1/23/2013 9:58 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: Randy McMurchy wrote: Please hold off on any more BLFS BOOK updates until I get this fixed. Thanks. What do you see missing? My local revision is 10962. And that is exactly the problem. There are two

Re: [blfs-dev] Does xterm work for UTF-8 ?

2013-02-10 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 10/02/2013 03:29, Ken Moffat a écrit : In connection with reviewing the TrueType fonts I build, I was going to ask if there was a reason why the book still installs legacy xorg fonts. I've only used TTF/OTF fonts for several years, and the only issue I've noticed is that xcalc can't

Re: [blfs-dev] Does xterm work for UTF-8 ?

2013-02-10 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 10/02/2013 12:58, Pierre Labastie a écrit : On Debian, the last four lines of /etc/X11/app-defaults/XTerm are commented out (including the faceName one), so those lines might not be the ones you want to modify. Sorry, that is not accurate. I meant that the lines *VT100*locale: true *VT100

[blfs-dev] Proposition for the GCC page

2013-02-10 Thread Pierre Labastie
Hi, Here is a patch to update the GCC page, since part of it is presently inaccurate. It also reintroduces ADA, and adds GO, for completeness. I can make a more complete patch (Changelog entry) if necessary. Regards, Pierre Index: blfsbook/general/prog/gcc.xml

Re: [blfs-dev] Proposition for the GCC page

2013-02-10 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 10/02/2013 21:35, Armin K. a écrit : On 02/10/2013 03:08 PM, Pierre Labastie wrote: Hi, Here is a patch to update the GCC page, since part of it is presently inaccurate. It also reintroduces ADA, and adds GO, for completeness. I can make a more complete patch (Changelog entry) if necessary

Re: [blfs-dev] Proposition for the GCC page

2013-02-11 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 10/02/2013 23:34, Bruce Dubbs a écrit : Pierre Labastie wrote: I think the out of memory error are tcl errors, not gcc. Amazingly, I have less unsupported tests than you in gcc (and many less XPASS or FAIL), but more unsupported tests in g++. I also have many more results for gfortran

Re: [blfs-dev] Large commit

2013-02-11 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 11/02/2013 20:20, Bruce Dubbs a écrit : Randy McMurchy wrote: Randy McMurchy wrote these words on 02/11/13 12:55 CST: I just ran my script that cleans up extraneous spaces from blank lines and at the end of lines in all the .xml files. If you use Vim to edit the book's .xml, you can add

Re: [blfs-dev] known to build on 7.3

2013-03-13 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 13/03/2013 19:13, Bruce Dubbs a écrit : OK, the book has been updated. It would make it easier for me if you didn't report those packages that have already been updated to 7.3. General report: lfs72: 462 lfs73: 168 It is just one more, but it is a long test: I succesfully built and

Re: [blfs-dev] Openjdk from gcj

2013-03-15 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 15/03/2013 01:25, DJ Lucas a écrit : On 03/13/2013 05:02 AM, Pierre Labastie wrote: You can add gcc, tested on both 64 bit and 32 bit. I also built openjdk starting from the gcj jvm, using upstream ant and ecj binaries. If anybody is interested, I can share the instructions. Pierre

Re: [blfs-dev] OpenSSL build failure with parallel make

2013-05-06 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 06/05/2013 07:05, Nathan Coulson a écrit : On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Bruce Dubbsbruce.du...@gmail.com wrote: Armin K. wrote: On 05/05/2013 12:41 PM, Igor Živković wrote: Hello, since OpenSSL fails to build with parallel make maybe a patch or at least a note about is warranted in

Re: [blfs-dev] Tag LFS 7.3 (built or executed properly)

2013-05-24 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 24/05/2013 05:11, Fernando a écrit : 11. LVM2-2.02.98 (builds) I have built and used that one several times, on LFS 7.3 and LFS SVN, and it works fine for all the uses I have (creating physical and logical volumes, starting in an initramfs with /dev/root on an LVM volume). Pierre --

Re: [blfs-dev] Automating BLFS

2013-08-25 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 25/08/2013 17:16, Bruce Dubbs a écrit : Rob Landley wrote: So if there's a vacuum, I note that I'm finally updating my old automated LFS 6.8 build to 7.4-rc1, and once I've got that I'd like to automate the corresponding BLFS release. (I automated 80 or so BLFS packages before, but that

[blfs-dev] Mismatch between LVM2 2.02.10x and initramfs

2013-11-02 Thread Pierre Labastie
Hi, I use an initramfs for LVM for booting LFS (7.4). Up to LVM2 2.02.98, /dev/volume group/logical volume were created by udev when typing `vgchange -ay'. So I could use a kernel line like this: linux /boot/vmlinuz... root=/dev/vg/lfs ro But starting at LVM2 2.02.100, only /dev/mapper/≤volume

Re: [blfs-dev] Mismatch between LVM2 2.02.10x and initramfs

2013-11-02 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 02/11/2013 17:27, Bruce Dubbs a écrit : Pierre Labastie wrote: Hi, I use an initramfs for LVM for booting LFS (7.4). I've always wondered why some do this. What's wrong with a simple 100M normal partition on the fist drive? /boot is rarely changed and easily backed up. A separate

Re: [blfs-dev] Proposed changes

2013-11-16 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 15/11/2013 22:54, akhiezer a écrit : From: Matt Burgess matt...@linuxfromscratch.org To: BLFS Development List blfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 20:13:04 + Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] Proposed changes On Fri, 2013-11-15 at 16:18 +, akhiezer wrote: I mean parsing

Re: [blfs-dev] A few things I have found with subversion

2013-11-18 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 18/11/2013 11:29, Fernando de Oliveira a écrit : Em 17-11-2013 19:12, Pierre Labastie escreveu: Hi all, In the process of updating apr and apr-util, I did a thorough test of subversion. I have found a few inaccuracies there: - the test time is much longer than indicated (38 SBU). BTW

Re: [blfs-dev] BLFS Updates

2013-11-19 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 19/11/2013 18:00, Bruce Dubbs a écrit : Just a note to say how impressed I am with the work of Igor and Fernando (with help from Ken and Pierre) on the updating of BLFS. I did a manual count of change log entries and got 331 changes in the 67 days since we released BLFS 7.4. That's an

Re: [blfs-dev] BLFS and package management

2013-11-23 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 23/11/2013 16:08, Thomas Trepl a écrit : Hi, [...] **Q** Long text, short question: How can I distinct pre-install, build-time- and post-install commands using the books instructions? I feel I can't as I can't see any different roles or such. Or is there something I missed? If

[blfs-dev] PHP and httpd.conf

2013-11-25 Thread Pierre Labastie
Hi, During my slow progress towards introducing SWIG into the book, I decided to build all the languages that SWIG could work with. Among those is PHP. I proceeded as in the book, but when rebooting, I got: Starting Apache HTTP daemon...httpd: Syntax error on line 171 of

Re: [blfs-dev] PHP and httpd.conf

2013-11-26 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 26/11/2013 09:12, Thomas Trepl a écrit : I think I have seen it too. Do you mean it's setting: LoadModule php5_module usr/lib/httpd/modules/libphp5.so I don't recall when I ran into the problem but it probably is in the php install code. I also seem to recall it adding a 2nd line when

Re: [blfs-dev] PHP and httpd.conf

2013-11-28 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 26/11/2013 18:27, Pierre Labastie a écrit : Le 26/11/2013 09:12, Thomas Trepl a écrit : I think I have seen it too. Do you mean it's setting: LoadModule php5_module usr/lib/httpd/modules/libphp5.so I don't recall when I ran into the problem but it probably is in the php install code

Re: [blfs-dev] xulrunner-25.0.1 fails to compile

2013-11-29 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 29/11/2013 14:57, Fernando de Oliveira a écrit : [...]If the problem persists and nobody comes with a solution, we will need to discuss reverting to older freetype (have never done a svn revert, if it exists). svn revert -rrevision number file to revert svn ci -m'revert something...'

Re: [blfs-dev] PHP and httpd.conf

2013-12-01 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 29/11/2013 07:10, Thomas Trepl a écrit : Am Donnerstag, 28. November 2013, 22:51:15 schrieb Pierre Labastie: Le 26/11/2013 18:27, Pierre Labastie a écrit : Pierre You are right, there is some other reason. The pathes are relative to what is defined in ServerRoot in httpd.conf. You

Re: [blfs-dev] PHP and httpd.conf

2013-12-01 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 01/12/2013 18:19, Bruce Dubbs a écrit : server, let me know what I could try. I think that's an excellent analysis. Go ahead and make the change. -- Bruce Thanks. Done at r 12320. Pierre -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ:

Re: [blfs-dev] [blfs-book] r12393 - in trunk/BOOK: . general/prog introduction/welcome

2013-12-14 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 14/12/2013 22:50, Bruce Dubbs a écrit : pie...@higgs.linuxfromscratch.org wrote: Author: pierre Date: Sat Dec 14 11:03:50 2013 New Revision: 12393 Log: Add SWIG package Added: trunk/BOOK/general/prog/swig.xml (contents, props changed) Modified: trunk/BOOK/general.ent

Re: [blfs-dev] [blfs-book] r12393 - in trunk/BOOK: . general/prog introduction/welcome

2013-12-15 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 15/12/2013 11:04, Fernando de Oliveira a écrit : In the post where you proposed swig, you also proposed changes to subversion other than statistics. Was so long ago ;-) (I have been real slow). Thanks for the reminder -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ:

[blfs-dev] Subversion update for swig

2013-12-15 Thread Pierre Labastie
Hi, I've ended with the attached patch. I do not want to commit yet, because I feel like I butchered Fernando's work, and I'd like him to agree. What it mainly does: Move swig and python to recommended, so that default instructions build Perl and Python bindings. Regards Pierre Index:

Re: [blfs-dev] Subversion update for swig

2013-12-15 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 15/12/2013 21:13, Fernando de Oliveira a écrit : Em 15-12-2013 17:04, Pierre Labastie escreveu: Go ahead, Pierre. Actually, last update for subversion was by Igor. I did not want to do it, exactly because thought you would do it and include your modifications. :-) Thanks for making

Re: [blfs-dev] Subversion update for swig

2013-12-18 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 18/12/2013 17:12, Bruce Dubbs a écrit : Pierre Labastie wrote: Hi, I've ended with the attached patch. I do not want to commit yet, because I feel like I butchered Fernando's work, and I'd like him to agree. What it mainly does: Move swig and python to recommended, so that default

Re: [blfs-dev] remove pcre from wireshark dependencies [Was: ... r12437 ]

2013-12-23 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 23/12/2013 22:05, Fernando de Oliveira a écrit : Em 23-12-2013 14:27, Igor Živković escreveu: On 12/23/2013 05:20 PM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: Em 23-12-2013 12:14, i...@higgs.linuxfromscratch.org escreveu: Author: igor Date: Mon Dec 23 07:14:25 2013 New Revision: 12437 Log: remove

Re: [blfs-dev] remove pcre from wireshark dependencies [Was: ... r12437 ]

2013-12-24 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 24/12/2013 03:29, Fernando de Oliveira a écrit : Em 23-12-2013 22:30, Igor Živković escreveu: On 12/24/2013 12:52 AM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: I hope you have seen the rest: there are many more places where it appears. I put only a small part. According to their subversion repository

Re: [blfs-dev] remove pcre from wireshark dependencies [Was: ... r12437 ]

2013-12-24 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 24/12/2013 00:44, Armin K. a écrit : On 23.12.2013 23:03, Pierre Labastie wrote: Le 23/12/2013 22:05, Fernando de Oliveira a écrit : Em 23-12-2013 14:27, Igor Živković escreveu: On 12/23/2013 05:20 PM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: Em 23-12-2013 12:14, i...@higgs.linuxfromscratch.org

[blfs-dev] About requiring xorg7

2013-12-26 Thread Pierre Labastie
Hi dear fellow editors, I have seen recent changes requiring xorg7 for packages pertaining to the installation of X (IIRC utils-macros and xcb-proto). This is not a problem in itself, since xorg7 is the introduction page, and there has been discussion about referring to the introduction for

Re: [blfs-dev] About requiring xorg7

2013-12-26 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 26/12/2013 16:56, Fernando de Oliveira a écrit : Em 26-12-2013 12:30, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: Fernando de Oliveira wrote: Em 26-12-2013 07:54, Pierre Labastie escreveu: Hi dear fellow editors, I have seen recent changes requiring xorg7 for packages pertaining to the installation of X (IIRC

Re: [blfs-dev] About requiring xorg7

2013-12-26 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 26/12/2013 18:27, Bruce Dubbs a écrit : Pierre Labastie wrote: Le 26/12/2013 16:56, Fernando de Oliveira a écrit : Em 26-12-2013 12:30, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: Fernando de Oliveira wrote: Em 26-12-2013 07:54, Pierre Labastie escreveu: For me, the problem is very particular, in this case

[blfs-dev] Dependencies in X chapter

2013-12-27 Thread Pierre Labastie
Hi, As you may have seen, I have added xorg-env as a dependency of xbitmaps. But since xbitmaps is required by Xorg applications, which also requires mesalib, which requires xcb-proto and the like, it may be not necessary. However, theoretically, a user following the dependencies for X server

Re: [blfs-dev] Dependencies in X chapter

2013-12-27 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 27/12/2013 17:03, Bruce Dubbs a écrit : Fernando de Oliveira wrote: Em 27-12-2013 09:26, Pierre Labastie escreveu: Hi, As you may have seen, I have added xorg-env as a dependency of xbitmaps. But since xbitmaps is required by Xorg applications, which also requires mesalib, which

Re: [blfs-dev] about subversion layout

2013-12-27 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 27/12/2013 18:28, Bruce Dubbs a écrit : Fernando de Oliveira wrote: I promised Pierre to not change his modifications in subversion, but every time I look at that page, I see that it is inconsistent with the rest of the book. To Pierre: please, I would like you to agree with me and then

Re: [blfs-dev] about subversion layout

2013-12-28 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 28/12/2013 12:10, Fernando de Oliveira a écrit : Em 27-12-2013 15:09, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu: Em 27-12-2013 14:53, Pierre Labastie escreveu: Le 27/12/2013 18:28, Bruce Dubbs a écrit : Fernando de Oliveira wrote: I promised Pierre to not change his modifications in subversion

Re: [blfs-dev] about subversion layout

2013-12-29 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 28/12/2013 22:57, Thomas Trepl a écrit : Btw, I'm impressed by the performance especially Pierre, Fernando and Igor are showing. The book seems to catch up to the bleeding edge and keeps being there ;-) Thanks for this work! I'm just on the way to compile KDE-4.12.0 (on a completely

Re: [blfs-dev] Docbook-Utils-0.6.14 build error

2013-12-29 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 28/12/2013 03:12, Fernando de Oliveira a écrit : Em 27-12-2013 19:55, Armin K. escreveu: Making install in man make[2]: Entering directory '/sources/docbook-utils-0.6.14/doc/man' SGML_CATALOG_FILES=/etc/sgml/catalog \ SGML_SEARCH_PATH=../../doc:.. \ nsgmls

Re: [blfs-dev] [blfs-book] r12492 - trunk/BOOK/networking/netlibs

2013-12-31 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 30/12/2013 23:56, Armin K. a écrit : On 30.12.2013 23:45, pie...@higgs.linuxfromscratch.org wrote: Author: pierre Date: Mon Dec 30 14:45:30 2013 New Revision: 12492 Log: Add forgotten explanation for disable-gssapi Modified: trunk/BOOK/networking/netlibs/libtirpc.xml Modified:

Re: [blfs-dev] [blfs-book] r12492 - trunk/BOOK/networking/netlibs

2013-12-31 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 31/12/2013 10:39, Pierre Labastie a écrit : Le 30/12/2013 23:56, Armin K. a écrit : On 30.12.2013 23:45, pie...@higgs.linuxfromscratch.org wrote: Author: pierre Date: Mon Dec 30 14:45:30 2013 New Revision: 12492 Log: Add forgotten explanation for disable-gssapi Modified: trunk

Re: [blfs-dev] man pages permissions wrong: none displayed

2013-12-31 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 31/12/2013 12:50, Fernando de Oliveira a écrit : I discovered today that no man page was displayed. The reason was a directory with wrong permissions: $ ls -dl /usr/share/man drwxr-x--- 52 root root 4096 Dez 27 13:28 /usr/share/man No idea why. Corrected with: # chmod -c 2775

Re: [blfs-dev] man pages permissions wrong: none displayed

2013-12-31 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 31/12/2013 17:38, Ken Moffat a écrit : On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 10:49:48AM -0300, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: Em 31-12-2013 10:07, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu: Em 31-12-2013 09:19, Pierre Labastie escreveu: Le 31/12/2013 12:50, Fernando de Oliveira a écrit : I discovered today that no man

Re: [blfs-dev] man pages permissions wrong: none displayed

2013-12-31 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 31/12/2013 18:18, Pierre Labastie a écrit : Le 31/12/2013 17:38, Ken Moffat a écrit : On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 10:49:48AM -0300, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: Em 31-12-2013 10:07, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu: Em 31-12-2013 09:19, Pierre Labastie escreveu: Le 31/12/2013 12:50, Fernando de

Re: [blfs-dev] Nitpick with Shadow Package

2013-12-31 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 31/12/2013 19:17, Bruce Dubbs a écrit : Armin K. wrote: On 12/31/2013 06:58 PM, Randy McMurchy wrote: Hi all, Looking at the BLFS Shadow package instructions, there is a command and descriptive text for disabling the Korean and Chinese man pages. However, this is not done in LFS. Seems

Re: [blfs-dev] Nitpick with Shadow Package

2013-12-31 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 31/12/2013 22:26, Ken Moffat a écrit : On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 01:36:47PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote: In any case, Randy's observation that LFS and BLFS install shadow differently is still accurate. Should we change LFS to omit the ko/zn man pages or remove the sed from BLFS that does

Re: [blfs-dev] Mesalib dependencies

2014-01-08 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 08/01/2014 10:30, Igor Živković a écrit : On 2014-01-08 03:11, Bruce Dubbs wrote: Randy McMurchy wrote: I can fix this if the team thinks it is worth looking at. I just think it can be clarified much better. Reply if you agree or disagree. I think it is worthy of discussion. I'd say go

Re: [blfs-dev] Mesalib dependencies

2014-01-08 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 08/01/2014 14:14, Pierre Labastie a écrit : Le 08/01/2014 10:30, Igor Živković a écrit : On 2014-01-08 03:11, Bruce Dubbs wrote: Randy McMurchy wrote: I can fix this if the team thinks it is worth looking at. I just think it can be clarified much better. Reply if you agree or disagree. I

[blfs-dev] Dependencies again

2014-01-11 Thread Pierre Labastie
Hello, Sorry for the long post. So for the impatient, the question is: why does the book have instructions for optional (not recommended) features? And what is the difference between optional and recommended if instructions are given for both? [Long version] I am having some doubt about the

Re: [blfs-dev] findmnt

2014-01-13 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 13/01/2014 18:58, Bruce Dubbs a écrit : Sometimes I pick up a new command that I wasn't aware of before. Today's discovery is findmnt. I've been using 'mount' and 'df' for years to see what mounts are available and for disk side. I find that: findmnt -ln -o

Re: [blfs-dev] libidn and dev note

2014-01-18 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 18/01/2014 13:48, Fernando de Oliveira a écrit : In summary, I wanted three things: 1. Move optional switch of Audacious --with-buildstamp=BLFS from Command Explanations to main, adding before use the word optional, and explaining the user may customize the value. Others may disagree,

[blfs-dev] About package updates

2014-01-18 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 18/01/2014 17:35, Bruce Dubbs a écrit : Armin K. wrote: On 01/18/2014 05:20 PM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: 1. I discovered, the bad way, that cups-filters do not work, if you update or reinstall cups. The instructions: rm -rf /usr/share/cups/banners rm -rf

  1   2   >