Re: [blfs-dev] libpwquality : should cracklib be required ?

Ken Moffat wrote: On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 04:17:06PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote: Ken Moffat wrote: My preference is recommended, if possible. But agree with Ken's decision if he still wishes to promote to required My rationale is that Recommended either means (i.) The package can build

Re: [blfs-dev] libpwquality : should cracklib be required ?

On Sun, Feb 07, 2016 at 09:40:07PM -0600, William Harrington wrote: > On Mon, 8 Feb 2016 02:17:25 + > Ken Moffat wrote: > > > I'm trying to build libpwquality, for whichever part of kde5 now > > requires it. I noted that we have PAM and Cracklib as > >

Re: [blfs-dev] libpwquality : should cracklib be required ?

On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 03:27:10PM -0300, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > Em 08-02-2016 00:40, William Harrington escreveu: > > On Mon, 8 Feb 2016 02:17:25 + > > Ken Moffat wrote: > > > >> I'm trying to build libpwquality, for whichever part of kde5 now > >> requires

[blfs-dev] json-c is an optional dependency of BIND-9.10.3-P3

Hi all When building bind, I noticed that configure checks for json-c and will also link against it. So maybe json-c might be listed as an optional dependency of bind. Kind regards Tim -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html

Re: [blfs-dev] libpwquality : should cracklib be required ?

Ken Moffat wrote: My preference is recommended, if possible. But agree with Ken's decision if he still wishes to promote to required My rationale is that Recommended either means (i.) The package can build without this, and without extra configure switches, but the recommended package

Re: [blfs-dev] libpwquality : should cracklib be required ?

Em 08-02-2016 17:28, Ken Moffat escreveu: > On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 03:27:10PM -0300, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: >> Em 08-02-2016 00:40, William Harrington escreveu: >>> On Mon, 8 Feb 2016 02:17:25 + >>> Ken Moffat wrote: >>> I'm trying to build libpwquality,

Re: [blfs-dev] libpwquality : should cracklib be required ?

On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 04:17:06PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Ken Moffat wrote: > > >>My preference is recommended, if possible. But agree with Ken's decision > >>if he still wishes to promote to required > >> > >My rationale is that Recommended either means > > > >(i.) The package can build

Re: [blfs-dev] I will mostly be doing: build testing

On Sun, Feb 07, 2016 at 05:18:27PM +, Ken Moffat wrote: > On Sun, Feb 07, 2016 at 12:03:18AM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > > May I suggest that you wait a week for a lot of your efforts as we will be > > going into a package freeze next weekend and will need to build everything > > in both