Re: [blfs-dev] Glamor

2014-08-14 Thread Christopher Gregory
On Thu, 2014-08-14 at 17:45 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Ken Moffat wrote: > > As of xorg-server-1.16, glamor is included in xorg-server. Ticket > > #5347 was created for this, but nobody apart from me (and Armin, for > > a clarification which led me to an optional --enable-glamor in the > > inte

Re: [blfs-dev] Glamor

2014-08-14 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Ken Moffat wrote: As of xorg-server-1.16, glamor is included in xorg-server. Ticket #5347 was created for this, but nobody apart from me (and Armin, for a clarification which led me to an optional --enable-glamor in the intel driver) has commented, and I have expressed my unwillingness to touc

[blfs-dev] Glamor

2014-08-14 Thread Ken Moffat
As of xorg-server-1.16, glamor is included in xorg-server. Ticket #5347 was created for this, but nobody apart from me (and Armin, for a clarification which led me to an optional --enable-glamor in the intel driver) has commented, and I have expressed my unwillingness to touch it because I won't

Re: [blfs-dev] Planning for lfs/blfs 7.6 release

2014-08-14 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Bruce Dubbs wrote: We need to do some planning for the upcoming release. Right now all books are looking pretty good. I would like to plan a coordinated release of LFS and BLFS for both trunk and systemd on September 1. In preparation, we will need to do a package freeze on August 15. At that

Re: [blfs-dev] efibootmgr

2014-08-14 Thread Armin K.
On 08/14/2014 11:12 AM, bayard wrote: > [first post] > > has anyone proposed creating a page for efibootmgr? this is an extremely > useful utility for those of us with uefi; especially on a multi-boot > machine. i've compiled it on a blfs system with no (okay, a few) problems. > the abstract looks

[blfs-dev] efibootmgr

2014-08-14 Thread bayard
[first post] has anyone proposed creating a page for efibootmgr? this is an extremely useful utility for those of us with uefi; especially on a multi-boot machine. i've compiled it on a blfs system with no (okay, a few) problems. the abstract looks like this: depends on: kernel flag CONFIG_EFIVAR