As a follow-on from the meson threads, I've done some more testing
with cmake packages.
AFAICS, there are no issues with using -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release in
released cmake packages on modern hardware (force -O3 and -DNDEBUG).
One package which I thought might be interesting was x265 (although
I do
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 09:32:44PM +, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
>
> Four points so far:
>
> 1. The default buildtype is still release (although only shown when
>you specify a buildtype), i.e. no change betwen 0.49.2 and
>0.50.0.
I can't type, can I ? As noted elsewhere, the def
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 06:13:01PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
> In mesa, I did 'mesaon configure' to see the options it understood.
> What I got was virtually unreadable due to really, really bad formatting
> for the mesa specific options.
>
> Attached is an edited version that is at l
In mesa, I did 'mesaon configure' to see the options it understood.
What I got was virtually unreadable due to really, really bad formatting
for the mesa specific options.
Attached is an edited version that is at least a little readable.
-- Bruce
Core properties:
Source dir /build/mesa/mesa-
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 09:32:44PM +, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
>
> Will look at some cmake packages later. I've now created #11872 for
> this.
>
I've now started to look at cmake applications.
I build the following which already use -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release
and have tests:
libjpeg
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 11:46:06AM -0500, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
> On 3/27/19 10:56 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > Compared to meson, a much greater use of -DNDEBUG. I have no idea
> > if CFLAGS, CXXFLAGS supplied in the environment override these
> > options.
> >
On 28/03/2019 16:25, Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev wrote:
On 3/28/19 2:28 AM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
On 28/03/2019 03:59, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
There are just too many problems with meson-0.50.0. Therefore I
have reverted
to meson-0.49.2 in lfs-svn until it gets fixed.
On 3/27/19 11:14 PM, Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev wrote:
In passing, I will note that I am not impressed by the implication
that our builders ought to run the tests for glib (in almost
everything else we use words like "if you wish to run the tests"),
also that it seems to write on the Xorg scre
On 3/27/19 10:56 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
[snip]
Compared to meson, a much greater use of -DNDEBUG. I have no idea
if CFLAGS, CXXFLAGS supplied in the environment override these
options.
But I think we ought to have something in Notes on Building Software
about the cmake defaults, a
On 2019-03-28 10:25 -0500, Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev wrote:
> I stand by my opinion that this version of Meson should've been
> Meson-1.0.0...
I think they should actually rename 0.49.0 to 49.0.0, 0.50.0 to 50.0.0, etc.
It seems I could build gnome just because of my blind luck (using a custo
On 3/28/19 2:28 AM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
On 28/03/2019 03:59, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
There are just too many problems with meson-0.50.0. Therefore I have reverted
to meson-0.49.2 in lfs-svn until it gets fixed.
If this is a conclusion of private discussions, please ma
oo
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On 28/03/2019 03:59, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
> There are just too many problems with meson-0.50.0. Therefore I have reverted
> to meson-0.49.2 in lfs-svn until it gets fixed.
>
If this is a conclusion of private discussions, please make them public, or
summarize them... If it is not, wel
13 matches
Mail list logo
