Re: [blfs-dev] Tagging status
On 27/02/2018 11:42, Pierre Labastie wrote: Le 26/02/2018 18:58:23, Bruce Dubbs a écrit : Pierre Labastie wrote: juffed works for me. What is the problem? If it is a problem with a library not found, I've fixed it (bad link in qscintilla) (r19867). Actually the right fix should be to use "readlink", as we do in LFS. Can you do the update and tag it please. I was trying to go too fast and was building juffed without lxqt. Is that needed? We use LIBRARY_PATH=$LXQT_PREFIX/lib, but do not mention lxqt in the dependencies. Oh yes, I'd seen that, but forgot about it... Of course, that's wrong if there is no LXQT_PREFIX. I'll try to build this on another system without LXQt. Actually, qtermwidget is recommended, and qtermwidget needs lxqt-build-tools. If lxqt-build-tools is in a prefix other than /usr, I think qtermwidget and juffed need to know about it. Now, there could be other possibilities like building qtermwidget and juffed in /usr even if LXQt is in /opt, but I cannot test this thoroughly before the release, I fear. So for now, The instructions need to stay as they are, and LXQT_PREFIX should be defined when building lxqt-build-tools; qtermwidget and juffed. Pierre -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] Tagging status
Le 26/02/2018 18:58:23, Bruce Dubbs a écrit : Pierre Labastie wrote: juffed works for me. What is the problem? If it is a problem with a library not found, I've fixed it (bad link in qscintilla) (r19867). Actually the right fix should be to use "readlink", as we do in LFS. Can you do the update and tag it please. I was trying to go too fast and was building juffed without lxqt. Is that needed? We use LIBRARY_PATH=$LXQT_PREFIX/lib, but do not mention lxqt in the dependencies. Oh yes, I'd seen that, but forgot about it... Of course, that's wrong if there is no LXQT_PREFIX. I'll try to build this on another system without LXQt. There is a ticket for alpine already (#10188). That is for a slightly different issue. I have the current tarball and will copy to anduin and update alpine. For abiword, I'll try the patch, and let you know. Please let us know. That's a complicated issue. I see flickering in KDE and LXQt, but not in Xfce... But in Xfce, the cursor is invisible... Not tried the patch yet. Not tested balsa (yet). I'm writing this mail using balsa... Pierre -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] Tagging status
Bruce Dubbs wrote: Bruce Dubbs wrote: Bruce Dubbs wrote: Bruce Dubbs wrote: Bruce Dubbs wrote: We are doing very well for the first weekend after package freeze: lfs81 tags remaining: 518 lfs82 tags : 274 Tickets targeted for 8.2: 34 === As of Tue Feb 20 05:46:29 UTC 2018 lfs81 tags remaining: 457 lfs82 tags : 335 Tickets targeted for 8.2: 20 I have a bunch of multimedia packages ready (~45) to tag, but not tonight. === As of Thu Feb 22 05:07:06 UTC 2018 lfs81 tags remaining: 272 lfs82 tags : 521 Tickets targeted for 8.2: 16 I tried to get the feh and mercurial tickets done today but am still trying to straighten out some issues. Some of these packages require a LOT of dependencies and have substantial circular dependencies if trying to build all the optional deps. Sat Feb 24 22:42:59 CST 2018 lfs81 tags remaining: 199 lfs82 tags : 594 Tickets targeted for 8.2: 13 I finished up kf5 today and will get the kf5-apps and plasma tomorrow. I also plan to do lxde and some other misc packages. A lot of the outstanding packages are systemd related, mostly gnome. DJ and I ran into some problems with java. We can't build junit or freetts. We probably need to update juint to version 4.12. Not sure about freetts and I haven't checked fop or IcedTea-Web. Sun Feb 25 20:06:54 CST 2018 lfs81 tags remaining: 99 lfs82 tags : 693 Tickets targeted for 8.2: 11 The junit problem has been solved. We decided to archive freetts until next cycle and possibly look for another text-to-speech app. New problem apps: juffed, abiword, balsa, alpine (url needs update but we have the tarball). lfs81 tags remaining: 46 lfs82 tags : 746 Tickets targeted for 8.2: 5 The balsa and alpine problems are solved. I think Pierre is working juffed and abiword. DJ is working chromium and samba. I'm like to get someone to tag exim, dovecot, wicd, ntfs-3g, and cifsutils. Hoping to get everything done for release by Wednesday. We'll give things a chance to settle for a day or two and plan on releasing Friday or Saturday. -- Bruce -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] Tagging status
Pierre Labastie wrote: juffed works for me. What is the problem? If it is a problem with a library not found, I've fixed it (bad link in qscintilla) (r19867). Actually the right fix should be to use "readlink", as we do in LFS. Can you do the update and tag it please. I was trying to go too fast and was building juffed without lxqt. Is that needed? We use LIBRARY_PATH=$LXQT_PREFIX/lib, but do not mention lxqt in the dependencies. There is a ticket for alpine already (#10188). That is for a slightly different issue. I have the current tarball and will copy to anduin and update alpine. For abiword, I'll try the patch, and let you know. Please let us know. Not tested balsa (yet). OK. I can do it if you don't have time. -- Bruce -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] Tagging status
On 26/02/2018 03:15, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> Bruce Dubbs wrote: >>> Bruce Dubbs wrote: Bruce Dubbs wrote: > We are doing very well for the first weekend after package freeze: > > lfs81 tags remaining: 518 > lfs82 tags : 274 > > Tickets targeted for 8.2: 34 === As of Tue Feb 20 05:46:29 UTC 2018 lfs81 tags remaining: 457 lfs82 tags : 335 Tickets targeted for 8.2: 20 I have a bunch of multimedia packages ready (~45) to tag, but not tonight. >>> >>> === >>> >>> As of Thu Feb 22 05:07:06 UTC 2018 >>> >>> lfs81 tags remaining: 272 >>> lfs82 tags : 521 >>> >>> Tickets targeted for 8.2: 16 >>> >>> I tried to get the feh and mercurial tickets done today but am still trying >>> to straighten out some issues. Some of these packages require a LOT of >>> dependencies and have substantial circular dependencies if trying to build >>> all the optional deps. >> >> Sat Feb 24 22:42:59 CST 2018 >> >> lfs81 tags remaining: 199 >> lfs82 tags : 594 >> >> Tickets targeted for 8.2: 13 >> >> I finished up kf5 today and will get the kf5-apps and plasma tomorrow. >> I also plan to do lxde and some other misc packages. >> >> A lot of the outstanding packages are systemd related, mostly gnome. >> >> DJ and I ran into some problems with java. We can't build junit or >> freetts. We probably need to update juint to version 4.12. Not sure about >> freetts and I haven't checked fop or IcedTea-Web. > > Sun Feb 25 20:06:54 CST 2018 > > lfs81 tags remaining: 99 > lfs82 tags : 693 > > Tickets targeted for 8.2: 11 > > The junit problem has been solved. We decided to archive freetts until next > cycle and possibly look for another text-to-speech app. > > New problem apps: juffed, abiword, balsa, alpine (url needs update but we have > the tarball). juffed works for me. What is the problem? If it is a problem with a library not found, I've fixed it (bad link in qscintilla) (r19867). Actually the right fix should be to use "readlink", as we do in LFS. There is a ticket for alpine already (#10188). For abiword, I'll try the patch, and let you know. Not tested balsa (yet). Pierre -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] Tagging status
Ken Moffat wrote: On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 11:24:05PM +0100, Pierre Labastie wrote: Also a few things I am seeking advice about: On the Mutt page, there is: "Mutt will rebuild the html documentation if libxslt is present, then use that to update the text manual - even if none of the specified browsers are present. That will create an empty text file, so we will save the shipped file.", and then, nothing is saved. Should this sentence be commented out? I _thought_ I had noticed the omission of the copy when I updated to 1.9.3, and decided it was valid, but I've just now rebuilt and got an empty text manual. My memory says that I noticed it at a late stage, and never got around to updating my own script. Trying to identify in which commit something disappeared is not easy, still looking - but it ought to be reinstated. Hmm, based on a suggestion at stackoverflow, of the form svn log --diff src/fozbo.cpp -r:HEAD suggests _I_ took it out in r19714, but trac doesn't show that: http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/changeset/19714 Looks like it was r19623. You missed it by 1 commit. http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/changeset?reponame==19623%40trunk%2FBOOK%2Fnetworking%2Fmailnews%2Fmutt.xml=19291%40trunk%2FBOOK%2Fnetworking%2Fmailnews%2Fmutt.xml -- Bruce -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] Tagging status
On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 11:24:05PM +0100, Pierre Labastie wrote: > > Also a few things I am seeking advice about: On the Mutt page, there is: "Mutt > will rebuild the html documentation if libxslt is present, then use that to > update the text manual - even if none of the specified browsers are present. > That will create an empty text file, so we will save the shipped file.", and > then, nothing is saved. Should this sentence be commented out? > I _thought_ I had noticed the omission of the copy when I updated to 1.9.3, and decided it was valid, but I've just now rebuilt and got an empty text manual. My memory says that I noticed it at a late stage, and never got around to updating my own script. Trying to identify in which commit something disappeared is not easy, still looking - but it ought to be reinstated. Hmm, based on a suggestion at stackoverflow, of the form svn log --diff src/fozbo.cpp -r:HEAD suggests _I_ took it out in r19714, but trac doesn't show that: http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/changeset/19714 Anyway, I'll reinstate it. ĸen -- Truth, in front of her huge walk-in wardrobe, selected black leather boots with stiletto heels for such a barefaced truth. - Unseen Academicals -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] Tagging status
Bruce Dubbs wrote: Bruce Dubbs wrote: Bruce Dubbs wrote: Bruce Dubbs wrote: We are doing very well for the first weekend after package freeze: lfs81 tags remaining: 518 lfs82 tags : 274 Tickets targeted for 8.2: 34 === As of Tue Feb 20 05:46:29 UTC 2018 lfs81 tags remaining: 457 lfs82 tags : 335 Tickets targeted for 8.2: 20 I have a bunch of multimedia packages ready (~45) to tag, but not tonight. === As of Thu Feb 22 05:07:06 UTC 2018 lfs81 tags remaining: 272 lfs82 tags : 521 Tickets targeted for 8.2: 16 I tried to get the feh and mercurial tickets done today but am still trying to straighten out some issues. Some of these packages require a LOT of dependencies and have substantial circular dependencies if trying to build all the optional deps. Sat Feb 24 22:42:59 CST 2018 lfs81 tags remaining: 199 lfs82 tags : 594 Tickets targeted for 8.2: 13 I finished up kf5 today and will get the kf5-apps and plasma tomorrow. I also plan to do lxde and some other misc packages. A lot of the outstanding packages are systemd related, mostly gnome. DJ and I ran into some problems with java. We can't build junit or freetts. We probably need to update juint to version 4.12. Not sure about freetts and I haven't checked fop or IcedTea-Web. Sun Feb 25 20:06:54 CST 2018 lfs81 tags remaining: 99 lfs82 tags : 693 Tickets targeted for 8.2: 11 The junit problem has been solved. We decided to archive freetts until next cycle and possibly look for another text-to-speech app. New problem apps: juffed, abiword, balsa, alpine (url needs update but we have the tarball). -- Bruce -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] Tagging status
Pierre Labastie wrote: Been there too. For junit, I have added a sed to the book, which allows to build junit-4.11. For junit-4.12, or junit-5.0.x, the build system is maven, so it is a big change, and not suitable for 8.2. Note that we should move to maven for 8.3, since fop can be built with maven too (and is deprecating ant builds). I agree with that approach. I tagged junit-4.11 earlier today. For freetts, the same trick as for junit allows to compile, but then the excutable fails with an exception about type casting. I'd suggest archiving freetts now, and moving to flite after 8.2. We can do that. Please open a ticket for 8.3 though. I'll archive freetts. other issues: I am also seeing the flickering in abiword, as reported in https://bugzilla.abisource.com/show_bug.cgi?id=13791. Looks like the bug is not fixed upstream. Do not know exactly what to do. The proposed patch is big, and does not apply cleanly to recent versions of abiword. I read through the bug. Last entry was September. Did you try changing themes? abiword builds and runs for me. I don't see any flickering, but I am running over ssh. The cursor does seem to be a bit erratic as the blink rate varies and sometimes disappears completely for several seconds. The only options I can see are to include a big warning or to just archive it. Also a few things I am seeking advice about: On the Mutt page, there is: "Mutt will rebuild the html documentation if libxslt is present, then use that to update the text manual - even if none of the specified browsers are present. That will create an empty text file, so we will save the shipped file.", and then, nothing is saved. Should this sentence be commented out? I haven't got to mutt yet, but I'd like to get Ken's opinion. I do not like the sed in ptlib, I'd rather use --disable-odbc (nothing uses ptlib with odbc anyway). See my preceding message about ptlib. See my reply in the other thread. And last, all the test in perl File::BaseDir in the userdirs.t part have failed for me. I guess there is a conflict with xdg-user-dirs, which I am using for LXQt. Should this be mentioned? What does cpan -i File::BaseDir do? -- Bruce -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] Tagging status
On 25/02/2018 05:56, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> Bruce Dubbs wrote: >>> Bruce Dubbs wrote: We are doing very well for the first weekend after package freeze: lfs81 tags remaining: 518 lfs82 tags : 274 Tickets targeted for 8.2: 34 >>> >>> === >>> >>> As of Tue Feb 20 05:46:29 UTC 2018 >>> >>> lfs81 tags remaining: 457 >>> lfs82 tags : 335 >>> >>> Tickets targeted for 8.2: 20 >>> >>> I have a bunch of multimedia packages ready (~45) to tag, but not tonight. >> >> === >> >> As of Thu Feb 22 05:07:06 UTC 2018 >> >> lfs81 tags remaining: 272 >> lfs82 tags : 521 >> >> Tickets targeted for 8.2: 16 >> >> I tried to get the feh and mercurial tickets done today but am still trying >> to straighten out some issues. Some of these packages require a LOT of >> dependencies and have substantial circular dependencies if trying to build >> all the optional deps. > > Sat Feb 24 22:42:59 CST 2018 > > lfs81 tags remaining: 199 > lfs82 tags : 594 > > Tickets targeted for 8.2: 13 > > I finished up kf5 today and will get the kf5-apps and plasma tomorrow. > I also plan to do lxde and some other misc packages. > > A lot of the outstanding packages are systemd related, mostly gnome. > > DJ and I ran into some problems with java. We can't build junit or freetts. > We probably need to update juint to version 4.12. Not sure about freetts and > I haven't checked fop or IcedTea-Web. > Been there too. For junit, I have added a sed to the book, which allows to build junit-4.11. For junit-4.12, or junit-5.0.x, the build system is maven, so it is a big change, and not suitable for 8.2. Note that we should move to maven for 8.3, since fop can be built with maven too (and is deprecating ant builds). For freetts, the same trick as for junit allows to compile, but then the excutable fails with an exception about type casting. I'd suggest archiving freetts now, and moving to flite after 8.2. other issues: I am also seeing the flickering in abiword, as reported in https://bugzilla.abisource.com/show_bug.cgi?id=13791. Looks like the bug is not fixed upstream. Do not know exactly what to do. The proposed patch is big, and does not apply cleanly to recent versions of abiword. Also a few things I am seeking advice about: On the Mutt page, there is: "Mutt will rebuild the html documentation if libxslt is present, then use that to update the text manual - even if none of the specified browsers are present. That will create an empty text file, so we will save the shipped file.", and then, nothing is saved. Should this sentence be commented out? I do not like the sed in ptlib, I'd rather use --disable-odbc (nothing uses ptlib with odbc anyway). See my preceding message about ptlib. And last, all the test in perl File::BaseDir in the userdirs.t part have failed for me. I guess there is a conflict with xdg-user-dirs, which I am using for LXQt. Should this be mentioned? Pierre -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] Tagging status
Bruce Dubbs wrote: Bruce Dubbs wrote: Bruce Dubbs wrote: We are doing very well for the first weekend after package freeze: lfs81 tags remaining: 518 lfs82 tags : 274 Tickets targeted for 8.2: 34 === As of Tue Feb 20 05:46:29 UTC 2018 lfs81 tags remaining: 457 lfs82 tags : 335 Tickets targeted for 8.2: 20 I have a bunch of multimedia packages ready (~45) to tag, but not tonight. === As of Thu Feb 22 05:07:06 UTC 2018 lfs81 tags remaining: 272 lfs82 tags : 521 Tickets targeted for 8.2: 16 I tried to get the feh and mercurial tickets done today but am still trying to straighten out some issues. Some of these packages require a LOT of dependencies and have substantial circular dependencies if trying to build all the optional deps. Sat Feb 24 22:42:59 CST 2018 lfs81 tags remaining: 199 lfs82 tags : 594 Tickets targeted for 8.2: 13 I finished up kf5 today and will get the kf5-apps and plasma tomorrow. I also plan to do lxde and some other misc packages. A lot of the outstanding packages are systemd related, mostly gnome. DJ and I ran into some problems with java. We can't build junit or freetts. We probably need to update juint to version 4.12. Not sure about freetts and I haven't checked fop or IcedTea-Web. -- Bruce -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] Tagging status
Bruce Dubbs wrote: Bruce Dubbs wrote: We are doing very well for the first weekend after package freeze: lfs81 tags remaining: 518 lfs82 tags : 274 Tickets targeted for 8.2: 34 === As of Tue Feb 20 05:46:29 UTC 2018 lfs81 tags remaining: 457 lfs82 tags : 335 Tickets targeted for 8.2: 20 I have a bunch of multimedia packages ready (~45) to tag, but not tonight. === As of Thu Feb 22 05:07:06 UTC 2018 lfs81 tags remaining: 272 lfs82 tags : 521 Tickets targeted for 8.2: 16 I tried to get the feh and mercurial tickets done today but am still trying to straighten out some issues. Some of these packages require a LOT of dependencies and have substantial circular dependencies if trying to build all the optional deps. -- Bruce -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] Tagging status
Bruce Dubbs wrote: We are doing very well for the first weekend after package freeze: lfs81 tags remaining: 518 lfs82 tags : 274 Tickets targeted for 8.2: 34 === As of Tue Feb 20 05:46:29 UTC 2018 lfs81 tags remaining: 457 lfs82 tags : 335 Tickets targeted for 8.2: 20 I have a bunch of multimedia packages ready (~45) to tag, but not tonight. -- Bruce -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
[blfs-dev] Tagging status
We are doing very well for the first weekend after package freeze: lfs81 tags remaining: 518 lfs82 tags : 274 Tickets targeted for 8.2: 34 -- Bruce -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page