Re: [blfs-dev] OpenJDK-1.7.0.9 (was: iced tea)
On 10/19/2012 05:54 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: Fernando de Oliveira wrote: Previous attachment had a line out of order and with a typo. []s, Fernando Thanks. That's helpful. Right now I'm running tests, but that takes quite a while. I think we should change the book to do a 'make download' to get the aux files. I also think the patch for fixing paths can be done with a sed and that makes is a little more obvious about what it is doing. It was a little difficult to figure out what was going on here, but I think I've got it now. Simplifying the build instructions should help others. Right now I'm up to 139 failures in the tests (3536 Passed). I'll examine it a little closer when it finally finishes. -- Bruce A couple more things... I did put reasons in the patch for the test failures. If they are the same, then that particular test can go. Also, the certificates patch could be dropped and done manually if desired. It was written for upstream and rejected as they did not want to use a bash script for UTF8 issues that I was unable to reproduce. It might be nice to make it a part of the ca-certificates section at some point. I still plan to upstream that patch again at some point in the future. I have a java version written by SUSE that I've modified to replace the bash script, but I haven't gotten around to writing a verify function (required in the case of crypto not built with NSS). -- DJ Lucas -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content, and is believed to be clean. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] OpenJDK-1.7.0.9 (was: iced tea)
Previous attachment had a line out of order and with a typo. []s, Fernando OpenJDK-1.7.0.7-to-1.7.0.9-some-differences-2012.10.19.log Description: Binary data -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] OpenJDK-1.7.0.9 (was: iced tea)
Fernando de Oliveira wrote: Previous attachment had a line out of order and with a typo. []s, Fernando Thanks. That's helpful. Right now I'm running tests, but that takes quite a while. I think we should change the book to do a 'make download' to get the aux files. I also think the patch for fixing paths can be done with a sed and that makes is a little more obvious about what it is doing. It was a little difficult to figure out what was going on here, but I think I've got it now. Simplifying the build instructions should help others. Right now I'm up to 139 failures in the tests (3536 Passed). I'll examine it a little closer when it finally finishes. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] OpenJDK-1.7.0.9 (was: iced tea)
Before replying below, sorry for the long lines. Only now remembered to reformat. --- Em sex, 19/10/12, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: De: Bruce Dubbs Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] OpenJDK-1.7.0.9 (was: iced tea) Para: BLFS Development List Data: Sexta-feira, 19 de Outubro de 2012, 19:54 Fernando de Oliveira wrote: Previous attachment had a line out of order and with a typo. Thanks. That's helpful. Right now I'm running tests, but that takes quite a while. Later, perhaps tomorrow, I will try to run the tests. I think we should change the book to do a 'make download' to get the aux files. I have been trying this for some time, thanks. But I just run ./autogen.sh $CONFIGURE time make -j1 cp -vn *.gz $SOURCEDIR and the files get downloaded, and saved to $SOURCEDIR, where I have already moved the previous ones to a temporary directory which will be deleted bay hand, after build successfully completes. Perhaps make download is more educative. I also think the patch for fixing paths can be done with a sed and that makes is a little more obvious about what it is doing. This is very good. It was a little difficult to figure out what was going on here, but I think I've got it now. Simplifying the build instructions should help others. Exactly. Right now I'm up to 139 failures in the tests (3536 Passed). I'll examine it a little closer when it finally finishes. As I wrote above, later on, will try to get them run. []s, Fernando -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
