Re: [blfs-dev] BLFS Basic

2018-09-11 Thread Thomas Trepl via blfs-dev
Am Dienstag, den 11.09.2018, 15:30 -0500 schrieb Bruce Dubbs via blfs- dev: > I've been working on a concept that I am calling BLFS Basic. This > is > basically a subset of BLFS Packages that should be a part of most > systems after LFS. I will attach my list at the end of this post. > > What

Re: [blfs-dev] Basic Packages for BLFS

2018-09-19 Thread Thomas Trepl via blfs-dev
Am Dienstag, den 18.09.2018, 21:34 -0500 schrieb Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev: > I've been working on a new book: > > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~bdubbs/basic-blfs-book/ > > The intention is to be an intermediate book between LFS and BLFS that is > much shorter and ease new users into BLFS and

Re: [blfs-dev] BLFS DHCP 4.4.1 broken with GCC 8+ (Patch Supplied)

2018-09-30 Thread Thomas Trepl via blfs-dev
Am Sonntag, den 30.09.2018, 23:06 -0400 schrieb Clayton Johnson via blfs-dev: > DHCP 4.4.1 broken in guide as of GCC 8 update. > > Attached patch will fix this issue. What do you mean by "broken"? What is the issue which gets fixed by that patch? dhcp compiles fine here with gcc-8.2.0. -- Thoma

Re: [blfs-dev] BLFS DHCP 4.4.1 broken with GCC 8+ (Patch Supplied)

2018-10-01 Thread Thomas Trepl via blfs-dev
Am Montag, den 01.10.2018, 17:24 +0100 schrieb Ken Moffat via blfs-dev: > On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 06:16:46AM +0200, Thomas Trepl via blfs-dev wrote: > > Am Sonntag, den 30.09.2018, 23:06 -0400 schrieb Clayton Johnson via > > blfs-dev: > > > DHCP 4.4.1 broken in

Re: [blfs-dev] BLFS DHCP 4.4.1 broken with GCC 8+ (Patch Supplied)

2018-10-01 Thread Thomas Trepl via blfs-dev
Am Montag, den 01.10.2018, 13:06 -0500 schrieb Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev: > On 10/01/2018 11:24 AM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 06:16:46AM +0200, Thomas Trepl via blfs-dev wrote: > > > Am Sonntag, den 30.09.2018, 23:06 -0400 schrieb Clayton Johnson v

[blfs-dev] No message for a week?

2018-10-07 Thread Thomas Trepl via blfs-dev
Strange that there is no new message for a week in blfs-dev. (This is just to see infrastructure works - sorry for the noise) -- Thomas -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: [blfs-dev] No message for a week?

2018-10-07 Thread Thomas Trepl via blfs-dev
Am Sonntag, den 07.10.2018, 10:59 -0500 schrieb Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev: > On 10/07/2018 09:06 AM, Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev wrote: > > > > On Sun, Oct 7, 2018 at 6:53 AM Thomas Trepl via blfs-dev > > > <mailto:blfs-dev@lists.linuxfromscratch.org>> wrote: &

Re: [blfs-dev] From xfce4-xkb-plugin to rustc, layering?

2018-11-04 Thread Thomas Trepl via blfs-dev
Am Donnerstag, den 01.11.2018, 14:47 -0400 schrieb Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev: > Hello, > > ... > > Well... as there is countries flags in "svg" format you > need librsvg, right > > librsvg need cargo (according designer, to be able to > easily set the compilation debug flag (?)), and ca

Re: [blfs-dev] From xfce4-xkb-plugin to rustc, layering?

2018-11-05 Thread Thomas Trepl via blfs-dev
Am Montag, den 05.11.2018, 09:52 -0600 schrieb Bruce Dubbs via blfs- dev: > On 11/05/2018 01:03 AM, Thomas Trepl via blfs-dev wrote: > > Am Donnerstag, den 01.11.2018, 14:47 -0400 schrieb Jean-Marc Pigeon > > via blfs-dev: > > > Hello, > > > > > > ... &g

[blfs-dev] VirtualBox running on LFS

2018-11-18 Thread Thomas Trepl via blfs-dev
Hi all, today VirtualBox started on a LFS host and i was able to start a VM with it. I'm definitely not saying it is fully functional, much more testing and bug fixing might be required for that. It is for sure not "production ready" yet as some errors are still there. It does not work to start ma

Re: [blfs-dev] VirtualBox running on LFS

2018-11-18 Thread Thomas Trepl via blfs-dev
Am Sonntag, den 18.11.2018, 15:07 -0600 schrieb DJ Lucas via blfs-dev: > > On 11/18/2018 05:35 AM, Thomas Trepl wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > today VirtualBox started on a LFS host and i was able to start a VM > > with it. I'm definitely not saying it is fully functional, much more > > testing and b

Re: [blfs-dev] VirtualBox running on LFS

2018-11-19 Thread Thomas Trepl via blfs-dev
Am Sonntag, den 18.11.2018, 22:52 +0100 schrieb Thomas Trepl via blfs- dev: > Again, this VBox on LFS is by far not running well atm. VirtualBox > GUI starts fine and it presents me all my VMs but i cannot start them > within the GUI. To start VMs i have to use "VBoxManage sta

Re: [blfs-dev] Sendmail, bind, s-nail, lshw

2018-11-26 Thread Thomas Trepl via blfs-dev
Am Montag, den 26.11.2018, 13:29 -0500 schrieb Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev: > ... > 4) Bind-9.13 > Why not use bind-9.13? > compiled 9.13.2, found no difference with building book > directives. > odd version numbers (9.13.x) are development releases, even numbers (9.12.x) are s

Re: [blfs-dev] Python modules dependencies

2018-12-08 Thread Thomas Trepl via blfs-dev
Am Samstag, den 08.12.2018, 09:39 +0100 schrieb Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev: > While testing jhalfs dependency algorithm, I discovered a few things about > python modules (there may be others): > - several modules have instructions for both python2 and python3, but Python2 > is not listed as a dep

Re: [blfs-dev] GnuTLS 3.6.5 is incompatible with Guile-2.2

2019-01-14 Thread Thomas Trepl via blfs-dev
Am Donnerstag, den 27.12.2018, 22:05 -0600 schrieb Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev: > Hey guys, > > > Just thought that I'd make everyone aware that GnuTLS-3.6.5 seems to be > incompatible with guile-2.2. In order to work around the problem, we'll > have to add --disable-guile to the configure lin

[blfs-dev] pulseaudio / fftw

2019-02-16 Thread Thomas Trepl via blfs-dev
Hi, while rebuilding stuff for 8.4 i came across pulseaudio. I have fftw installed and so i expected that pulseaudio will link to it somehow (as it it mentioned as an optional dep). But it didn't. The config.log of pulseaudio shows: ... configure:23251: checking for FFTW configure:23258: $PKG_CON

Re: [blfs-dev] pulseaudio / fftw

2019-02-17 Thread Thomas Trepl via blfs-dev
Am Sonntag, den 17.02.2019, 09:08 +0100 schrieb Armin K. via blfs-dev: > On 17.2.2019. 07:04, Thomas Trepl via blfs-dev wrote: > > Hi, > > > > while rebuilding stuff for 8.4 i came across pulseaudio. I have fftw > > installed and so i expected that pulseaudio will link

Re: [blfs-dev] BLFS 8.4 Progress Report

2019-02-22 Thread Thomas Trepl via blfs-dev
Am Freitag, den 22.02.2019, 10:19 +0100 schrieb Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev: > On 22/02/2019 07:11, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote: > > We only have a few tags left: > > > > lfs83 tags: 33 > > ;fs84 tags: 803 > > > > ... > > networking/mailnews/fetchmail.xml:&lfs83_checked; > > ... Just lo

Re: [blfs-dev] BLFS 8.4 Progress Report

2019-02-22 Thread Thomas Trepl via blfs-dev
Am Freitag, den 22.02.2019, 10:59 +0100 schrieb Thomas Trepl via blfs- dev: > Am Freitag, den 22.02.2019, 10:19 +0100 schrieb Pierre Labastie via > blfs-dev: > > On 22/02/2019 07:11, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote: > > > We only have a few tags left: > > > > >

[blfs-dev] Mesalib-19.0.0 drivers

2019-03-15 Thread Thomas Trepl via blfs-dev
Hi all, in the instructions the list of drivers to be built is setup by GALLIUM_DRV="i915,nouveau,radeonsi,svga,swrast" DRI_DRIVERS="i915,i965,nouveau" PLATFORMS="x11,wayland,drm" Two times i915 while the text above says "The gallium available drivers are pl111, radeonsi, r300, r600, nouveau, an

Re: [blfs-dev] A few issues with most recent book

2019-03-16 Thread Thomas Trepl via blfs-dev
Am Samstag, den 16.03.2019, 10:39 +0100 schrieb Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev: > Hi, > > For porting lxde to GTK+3, I have decided to rebuild completely lfs/blfs with > most recent versions. I found a few issues (only built lxde deps): > - mesa-19.0.0: running "make -C ../xdemos DEMOS_PREFIX=$XORG_

Re: [blfs-dev] A few issues with most recent book

2019-03-16 Thread Thomas Trepl via blfs-dev
Am Samstag, den 16.03.2019, 07:33 -0600 schrieb Roger Koehler via blfs-dev: > On Sat, Mar 16, 2019 at 3:39 AM Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev > wrote: > > For porting lxde to GTK+3, I have decided to rebuild completely lfs/blfs > > with > > most recent versions. > > I'd be interested in knowing if

[blfs-dev] Multilib branch

2019-04-11 Thread Thomas Trepl via blfs-dev
Hi all, for those who are interested in multilib-LFS: A branch of the current trunk has been created and now contains all modifications to support m32 as well as mx32. Browse the sources at http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/browser/branches/multilib and find the rendered book at http://www.l

Re: [blfs-dev] pulseaudio runaway

2019-04-30 Thread Thomas Trepl via blfs-dev
Am Dienstag, den 30.04.2019, 16:13 -0500 schrieb Bruce Dubbs via blfs- dev: > I've been noticing that sometimes pulseaudio consumes 100% of one core > and stays that way for hours. In one case I can close every application > on my desktop and pulseaudio still runs at 100%. > > It doesn't really

Re: [blfs-dev] pulseaudio runaway

2019-04-30 Thread Thomas Trepl via blfs-dev
Am Dienstag, den 30.04.2019, 15:59 -0600 schrieb Roger Koehler via blfs-dev: > On Tue, Apr 30, 2019, 3:50 PM Ken Moffat via blfs-dev > wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 04:13:44PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote: > > > > > I've been noticing that sometimes pulseaudio consumes 100% of one

[blfs-dev] libcap instruction

2019-05-30 Thread Thomas Trepl via blfs-dev
Hi all, shouldn't the very last instruction in libcap read as tail -n +3 /etc/pam.d/system-auth.bak >> /etc/pam.d/system-auth instead of tail -n +3 /etc/pam.d/system-auth.bak << /etc/pam.d/system-auth (I can fix it, just want to be sure that its correct) -- Thomas -- http://lists.li

Re: [blfs-dev] Differences between SysV and systemd in rpcbind

2019-06-12 Thread Thomas Trepl via blfs-dev
Am Mittwoch, den 12.06.2019, 11:01 -0500 schrieb Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev: > Hi folks, > > I was just building rpcbind-1.2.5 and noticed a curious difference between > SysV and systemd's instructions. > On systemd, we create a separate "rpc" user to isolate the package similar to > how we wo

Re: [blfs-dev] Since changes are coming...

2019-06-25 Thread Thomas Trepl via blfs-dev
Am Sonntag, den 23.06.2019, 17:55 -0400 schrieb Joe Locash via blfs- dev: > Is there any interest in adding MATE to BLFS? I have it working, just > tweaking the minor issues out. Due to change of my ISP, my answer to this thread gots lost in space. All of what I'd like to comment has been said i

Re: [blfs-dev] xfce 4.14

2019-08-13 Thread Thomas Trepl via blfs-dev
Am Dienstag, den 13.08.2019, 19:58 +0200 schrieb Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev: > Hi all > > > For anybody using xfce4 as their desktop, I wanted to share my progress > regarding the new release. > > I have now compiled all new packages in the usual order, without any > problem. Just to be sure,

[blfs-dev] rustc and DESTDIR

2019-09-30 Thread Thomas Trepl via blfs-dev
Hi all, so far i have built a nice Xfce system avoiding python2, gtk2 and rustc at all and Xfce-4.14 builds/runs fine without gtk2. For librsvg i use the old non-rust version 2.40.20 which still works pretty well - ok, i know, thats not really the way to go but building gigabytes of compiler stuff

Re: [blfs-dev] rustc and DESTDIR

2019-09-30 Thread Thomas Trepl via blfs-dev
Am Montag, den 30.09.2019, 12:57 -0500 schrieb Bruce Dubbs via blfs- dev: > On 9/30/19 12:40 PM, Xi Ruoyao via blfs-dev wrote: > > On 2019-09-30 12:37 -0500, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote: > > > On 9/30/19 12:25 PM, Xi Ruoyao via blfs-dev wrote: > > > > On 2019-09-30

Re: [blfs-dev] proposal: add -DLLVM_BINUTILS_INCDIR=/usr/include for LLVM

2020-04-03 Thread Thomas Trepl via blfs-dev
Am Freitag, den 27.03.2020, 22:13 +0800 schrieb Xi Ruoyao via blfs- dev: > It would make LLVM building system to build LLVMgold.so with Binutils headers > installed in LFS, which is a linker plugin so we can use "clang -flto hw.c". What impact does it have if we do not add the -DLLVM switch. In ge

Re: [blfs-dev] About thunderbird build size

2020-04-10 Thread Thomas Trepl via blfs-dev
Am Donnerstag, den 09.04.2020, 20:28 +0200 schrieb Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev: > > > > > I'm planning to do a full rebuild this year, if time permits, shall I > > > refrain from updating stuff until then? > > > > Yes, I think you probably should do that. I do not update my day-to-day > > syste

Re: [blfs-dev] Linux-PAM option --enable-db=no

2020-12-03 Thread Thomas Trepl via blfs-dev
Am Mittwoch, dem 02.12.2020 um 20:13 +0100 schrieb Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev: > > On 12/1/20 11:23 PM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote: > > On 12/1/20 3:02 PM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 12/1/20 5:33 PM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote: > > > > On 12/1/20 7:48 AM, Tim Ta