-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Donal Farrell wrote:
Hi there. Is it to be considered dangerous to update my kernel from
2.6.8.2 to 2.6.11.x ?? Can I do this just by patching the kernel and
redoing the makeconfig, etc. I have no backup made of anything, so what
should I be
On 4/26/05, DJ Lucas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dan McGhee wrote:
Thanks, Andrew. But I asked for good documentation G.
Hit google for Unix File Permissions. This will give you about 100
really good hits...maybe add sticky to the search terms to find the ones
that have really in-depth
On 4/25/05, Donal Farrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First of all, I think I'm the fatality here, not the package. I'm
getting the same problem with Xorg 6.8.2 over and over again. My
xorg.conf look ok, and I have loaded the freefonts ttf fonts into the
/TTF directory in /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts
Yupe stab city - the home of hurling!! Got that matter fixed by editing
fonts.alias in the /misc folder.
To sum up this question, and the other about the livecd, can I now add
whatever application software I need, compress the fs (reiser) and build
a livecd for my own system, as I'm going to
Hello,
i was recently dealing with hw support for 3D acceleration on LFS 6.0,
kernel 2.6.9. With Radeon 9600 card, ati binary driver is the only
way. Im using X.org 6.8.2 so i was trying to get up driver
fglrx_6_8_0-8.12.10-1.i386.rpm.
Everything went fine, including tv out, except 3d
On 4/26/05, Declan Moriarty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The sticky bit is the fourth permission digit. So you have 4711
instead of 711 for programs that retain the owner's(usually root)
permissions.
Actually if the sticky bit is set you would have 1711, and if the suid
bit is set you get
On Mon, 2005-04-25 at 06:21 -0500, Dan McGhee wrote:
In getting to this point in Linux, I've read many times something to the
effect, This needs to be setuid root. And that this means that the
sticky bit is set. Beyond that I can't find anything. What does
setuid really mean? What
On 4/26/05, Donal Farrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi again. I am having difficulties with gnome 2.10/Xorg6.8.2 When I do
startx, I get a gnome-terminal from which I do the commands metacity, or
opera, or nautilus. Any of these (and more) (and as root) give the
error: Cannot find display X.
I'm trying to make gnome2.10 on Xorg 6.8.2, and am having no luck at
all. My latest problem is as follows. I can get onto the gnome terminal
when I do startx, and I can use Opera. When I try to issue the nautilus
command, I get the following:
Window Manager Warning: Log level 6: file group.conf
Simon Geard wrote these words on 04/26/05 06:45 CST:
On Mon, 2005-04-25 at 19:21 -0500, Randy McMurchy wrote:
Other than that, GNOME-VFS requires a patch to compile with HAL,
Which version of HAL are you playing with?
Most recent.
Gnome 2.10 isn't compatible
with the current releases of
where can I get the patch? How do I reinstall gnome-vfs with this patch?
Thanks,
Donal
On Tue, 2005-04-26 at 14:36, Randy McMurchy wrote:
Simon Geard wrote these words on 04/26/05 06:45 CST:
On Mon, 2005-04-25 at 19:21 -0500, Randy McMurchy wrote:
Other than that, GNOME-VFS requires a
Almost. I am now getting the gnome desktop, the blue-ish background,
nautilus will let me browse folders and even open blfs-book files usiong
opera. However, every so often, the screen goes black and a message
apperas saying gdm cant locate the gdm user in gdm.conf
also, after these blips, there
On 4/26/05, Donal Farrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi again. I think I've got my gnome working properly, and gdm. I
reinstalled the install-gdm from blfs-bootscripts. When i changed the
default init level to 5 in /etc/inittab, and rebooted, I get the
message loading gdm
gdm is already
Hello, B. [EMAIL PROTECTED]!
On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 21:18:25 +0400 you wrote:
Neither have I. So I'll suggest the obvious. Presume something is
mucked up and try these.
Thanks. I'd try it tomorrow.
Well, I have carefully recompiled pango (1.8.1), atk (1.9.0) and gtk
(2.6.7) (I have attached
Hi. i'm having dependency issues with evolution 2.2.0. i have
evolution-data-server installled correctly, but evolution claims it
needs libgtkhtml = 3.6.0 I originally had 3.5.3 so I updated to gtkhtml
3.7 with no luck. Has anyone experienced the same problems?
Regards,
Donal
--
15 matches
Mail list logo
