On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 00:27 +, Ken Moffat wrote:
FWIW, I tried a minimal gnome, based on what I'd
been using for 2.26. GConf2 needs hal, or something
else I'd rather not have, so I stuck with 2.26 for that.
GConf 2.28 doesn't use Hal, but it does have use Policykit, which I
guess is what
Why does LFS stay so far ahead of BLFS? What is the point of building
the newest LFS if the BLFS files are older and probably won't work or
would be replacing newer versions of apps with older versions?
There is a note on the BLFS that says in one or two months a new BLFS
will be released. There
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 05:23:03 -0500, stosss sto...@gmail.com wrote:
Why does LFS stay so far ahead of BLFS? What is the point of building
the newest LFS if the BLFS files are older and probably won't work or
would be replacing newer versions of apps with older versions?
BLFS, like all of the
Thanks Thomas for your suggestion, with xorg-cf-package installed it's
better, I have to notice that another error appears during the make step.
This error seems to be due to the gcc 4.4(installed in the LFS 6.5). I've
downgraded to the 4.3 version and the build is ok.
Simone
2009/11/23
There is a note on the BLFS that says in one or two months a new BLFS
will be released. There is no date as to when that was put there or a
target date for release. What is the target date for that one or two
months?
I understand why the version BLFS is often behind LFS. However, I do
rhubarb...@poetworld.net wrote:
I understand why the version BLFS is often behind LFS. However, I do
think the one or two months BLFS statement should be changed as it
hurts credibility.
OK, done.
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ:
I think one thing is not in the book : the answer to the question why
is this package not in the book/why is this version so old/why doesn't
the book evolve any faster
Come on, guys, what do you think you are dealing with ? This is an
entirely free, cooperative work. Nothing advances if
Le Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:03:36 -0500,
stosss sto...@gmail.com a écrit :
I think one thing is not in the book : the answer to the question
why is this package not in the book/why is this version so old/why
doesn't the book evolve any faster
Come on, guys, what do you think you are
stosss wrote:
I just got to the point of doing BLFS. I know the project is
volunteer. All the books say use whats recommended in the book. Why
release something just because it is ready when the next part (the
more important part) is not. I was just asking straight forward
questions.
There
This just shows that you missed the point of the LFS project :
I understand the point of the LFS book
And my attitude is not shitty as you say,
Yes it is!
Hey, guys, your book
sucks, if I did it myself, it would be much better, faster... etc..
That was how you took my post that was not my
Nicolas FRANCOIS wrote:
PS : As a matter of fact, I'm french, so I don't quite understand
FOAD :-)
It's rude and crude. It has no place on the lfs mailing lists.
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
On 24/11/09 17:20, Richard Melville wrote:
time. I've only just heard of Terminator myself; a friend of mine
tweeted about it. It looks pretty interesting, and as I'm having minor
problems with urxvt (I'm finding it a bit buggy) I thought that I'd give
it a go when I'm less busy.
For
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
rhubarb...@poetworld.net wrote:
I understand why the version BLFS is often behind LFS. However, I do
think the one or two months BLFS statement should be changed as it
hurts credibility.
OK, done.
-- Bruce
I just checked the site. That's much better.
Message: 7
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 07:51:13 +1100
From: Wayne Blaszczyk wblas...@bigpond.net.au
Subject: Re: Gnome misbehavior
To: BLFS Support List blfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
Message-ID: 4b0af5c1.4070...@bigpond.net.au
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
-BEGIN PGP
Alonso
--
I think you'll find the warning in the gnome log is normal,
and very unlikely to be related to this.
I no longer build kde, but I can offer you a couple of
suggestions:
(i.) if you built xorg in anywhere other than /usr, try
symlinking from /usr so that the headers can be
15 matches
Mail list logo
