Re: [blfs-support] Xorg-7.7 Does not Detect Input Devices on 64-bit Build

2013-11-04 Thread John Frankish
BUT the first mentions of evdev in my log are [ 23798.003] (II) config/udev: Adding input device Power Button(/dev/input/event1) [ 23798.004] (**) Power Button: Applying InputClass evdev keyboard catchall [ 23798.004] (**) Power Button: Applying InputClass keyboard-all

Re: [blfs-support] noshell

2013-11-04 Thread Richard Melville
On 4 November 2013 07:00, blfs-support-requ...@linuxfromscratch.org wrote: Send blfs-support mailing list submissions to Richard Melville wrote: Does anybody have any experience of noshell as a replacement for /bin/false and /dev/null? I realise that it's quite old, but is it still

Re: [blfs-support] Process accounting

2013-11-04 Thread Richard Melville
Am Sonntag, 3. November 2013, 16:30:32 schrieb Richard Melville: Still on the subject of server hardening I was looking for acct-6.6.1.tar.gz http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/acct/acct-6.6.1.tar.gz in the BLFS book and couldn't find it. Is there any reason why this is omitted; has process accounting

[blfs-support] typo in gst-plugins-bad-0.10.23?

2013-11-04 Thread Walter P. Little
For gst-plugins-bad-0.10.23 ( http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/stable/multimedia/gst-plugins-bad.html), I just noticed that FAAC-1.28 is listed both in recommended and optional. Seems like it should just be in one of the categories (perhaps it got promoted to recommended at some point?).

[blfs-support] saslauthd port?? question

2013-11-04 Thread lux-integ
does anyone know if saslauthd has a port it listens to ? ( in otherwords are there iptabless rules for cyrus-sasl? ) thanks in advance -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: [blfs-support] typo in gst-plugins-bad-0.10.23?

2013-11-04 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Walter P. Little wrote: For gst-plugins-bad-0.10.23 ( http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/stable/multimedia/gst-plugins-bad.html), I just noticed that FAAC-1.28 is listed both in recommended and optional. Seems like it should just be in one of the categories (perhaps it got promoted to

Re: [blfs-support] noshell

2013-11-04 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Simon Geard wrote: On Sun, 2013-11-03 at 11:03 -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote: I'm unaware why noshell would be an advantage over /bin/false. What does it do that is needed? Most google results indicate that it's to do with logging - that noshell will report that someone attempted to obtain a

Re: [blfs-support] Xorg-7.7 Does not Detect Input Devices on 64-bit Build

2013-11-04 Thread Ken Moffat
On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 08:03:09AM +, John Frankish wrote: 10-evdev.conf is at /usr/local/share/X11/xorg.conf.d and verified to be the same as the 32-bit install, which works. I'm not sure I follow that : did you verify the file's contents or it's location match ? Both

[blfs-support] libvpx-v1.2.0 MD5SUM

2013-11-04 Thread alex lupu
Fernando, Bruce: Thank you very much. Cheers, -- Alex -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

[blfs-support] Comment/Question/Flame on probably the most used admin tool, 'find'

2013-11-04 Thread alex lupu
I'm saddened that after all these years there's apparently no easy way to do something like (expressed in Artificial Intelligence :): Find files modified (accessed, created) in a range of time (in minutes) After but Before a time in minutes ago. Most people with PhD's in find, claim you cannot

Re: [blfs-support] Comment/Question/Flame on probably the most used admin tool, 'find'

2013-11-04 Thread Dan McGhee
On 11/04/2013 02:36 PM, alex lupu wrote: I'm saddened that after all these years there's apparently no easy way to do something like (expressed in Artificial Intelligence :): Find files modified (accessed, created) in a range of time (in minutes) After but Before a time in minutes ago. Most

Re: [blfs-support] Comment/Question/Flame on probably the most used admin tool, 'find'

2013-11-04 Thread Bruce Dubbs
alex lupu wrote: I'm saddened that after all these years there's apparently no easy way to do something like (expressed in Artificial Intelligence :): Find files modified (accessed, created) in a range of time (in minutes) After but Before a time in minutes ago. Most people with PhD's in

Re: [blfs-support] Comment/Question/Flame on probably the most used admin tool, 'find'

2013-11-04 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Bruce Dubbs wrote: alex lupu wrote: I'm saddened that after all these years there's apparently no easy way to do something like (expressed in Artificial Intelligence :): Find files modified (accessed, created) in a range of time (in minutes) After but Before a time in minutes ago. Most

Re: [blfs-support] Comment/Question/Flame on probably the most used admin tool, 'find'

2013-11-04 Thread alex lupu
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote: Bruce Dubbs wrote: alex lupu wrote: I'm saddened that after all these years there's apparently no easy way to do something like (expressed in Artificial Intelligence :): Find files modified (accessed, created) in a

Re: [blfs-support] at-spi2-core-2.10.1 build fails

2013-11-04 Thread Simon Geard
On Mon, 2013-11-04 at 09:43 +, John Frankish wrote: Indeed - I'd mistyped the cc - gcc symlink, after correcting it, things work Thanks for that, it would have taken me a long time to discover :) Yeah, being a Python coder helps when you're confronted by a stack trace like that one...