Em 17-02-2014 11:21, Richard escreveu:
- Original Message -
From: Fernando de Oliveira fam...@yahoo.com.br
...
I do not believe that midori is going to give you more than you suceeded
to get from 'surf' (below), but I am adding a patch to disable libnotify
in midori. Apply with
From: Richard r_j_humphr...@yahoo.co.uk
...
From: Fernando de Oliveira fam...@yahoo.com.br
...
Out of ideas, I guess that somewhere flash plugins are disabled. If you
could buikd Midori, then you could enable/disable flash. Then if it
works, problem solved. Also under Edit - Preferences
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 12:17:29 + (GMT)
From: Richard r_j_humphr...@yahoo.co.uk
To: BLFS Support List blfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
Subject: Re: [blfs-support] WebKitGTK-1/Flash
.
.
the absence of success I will simply have to resort to windows when flash
is required
Em 17-02-2014 09:17, Richard escreveu:
From: Richard r_j_humphr...@yahoo.co.uk
...
From: Fernando de Oliveira fam...@yahoo.com.br
...
Out of ideas, I guess that somewhere flash plugins are disabled. If you
could buikd Midori, then you could enable/disable flash. Then if it
works, problem
- Original Message -
From: Fernando de Oliveira fam...@yahoo.com.br
...
I do not believe that midori is going to give you more than you suceeded
to get from 'surf' (below), but I am adding a patch to disable libnotify
in midori. Apply with
patch -Np1 -i
- Original Message -
From: akhiezer lf...@cruziero.com
...You mentioned that earlier, too - if not current-approach then windows.
Would you consider a seamonkey build on linux as an intermediately-acceptable
solution for seeing flash in (and use uzbl or whatever as your main
The patch of previous post should be used with care. I have not tested
lal consequences, and made it just for your test case.
--
[]s,
Fernando
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information
- Original Message -
From: Fernando de Oliveira fam...@yahoo.com.br
...
Out of ideas, I guess that somewhere flash plugins are disabled. If you
could buikd Midori, then you could enable/disable flash. Then if it
works, problem solved. Also under Edit - Preferences - Extensions it
must
Em 08-02-2014 21:21, Richard escreveu:
- Original Message -
From: Fernando de Oliveira fam...@yahoo.com.br
...
I know you started installing yourself, then copied a plugin from
another distribution. My last guess is that you have a broken flash
installation. Just to be sure, I
- Original Message -
From: Fernando de Oliveira fam...@yahoo.com.br
...
I know you started installing yourself, then copied a plugin from
another distribution. My last guess is that you have a broken flash
installation. Just to be sure, I reproduce below the instructions I use:
Em 28-01-2014 04:35, William Tracy escreveu:
On Jan 16, 2014 6:19 AM, Fernando de Oliveira fam...@yahoo.com.br
mailto:fam...@yahoo.com.br wrote:
I've been running Flash without Java for years, both under Windows and
Linux. The problem is somewhere else.
I did not say the contrary.
But in
- Original Message -
From: Richard r_j_humphr...@yahoo.co.uk
...
I installed hicolor and curl last night. Neither has made any difference to
the underlying problem (flash is still not working) - but the logs are a
little
cleaner. :)
I did not have time to install Java - but
Em 28-01-2014 07:09, Richard escreveu:
- Original Message -
From: Richard r_j_humphr...@yahoo.co.uk
...
I installed hicolor and curl last night. Neither has made any
difference to the underlying problem (flash is still not working) -
but the logs are a little cleaner. :)
I did
Richard wrote:
I spent some time reading the BLFS instructions on installing java
and found it rather confusing. I am assuming that it is the 'circular
dependencies' alluded to in the text which make it such a
non-standard installation? In the end I downloaded Java from Oracle
and installed
On Jan 16, 2014 6:19 AM, Fernando de Oliveira fam...@yahoo.com.br wrote:
- javascript and java are completely unrelated. They share only a
common name and syntax. Surely the java plugin is unrelated to
javascript?
OK.
- I am aware that many .swf files are depandant on javascript
- Original Message -
From: Fernando de Oliveira fam...@yahoo.com.br
...
1. hicolor: this is not interfering with the problem, I think, but is
clearing been needed by GtkLauncher. As WebKitGTK is always supposed to
be used by other applications, hicolor is not recommended there, but
Em 15-01-2014 10:02, Richard escreveu:
- Original Message -
From: Fernando de Oliveira fam...@yahoo.com.br
...
Instead of replying to myself from another post where I promised
it, will include below the data you asked and some more. Almost the
same as for LFS7.1, but now, from
Thanks for the advice - I will look into these tonight and report progress.
Some notes below:
- Original Message -
From: Fernando de Oliveira fam...@yahoo.com.br
...
1. hicolor: this is not interfering with the problem, I think, but is
clearing been needed by GtkLauncher. As
Em 16-01-2014 09:54, Richard escreveu:
Thanks for the advice - I will look into these tonight and report progress.
Some notes below:
- Original Message -
From: Fernando de Oliveira fam...@yahoo.com.br
...
1. hicolor: this is not interfering with the problem, I think, but is
- Original Message -
From: Fernando de Oliveira fam...@yahoo.com.br
...
Instead of replying to myself from another post where I promised it,
will include below the data you asked and some more. Almost the same as
for LFS7.1, but now, from LFS7.4. Before doing that, may I ask you to do
Apologies - I have had distractions from 'real life' and am now catching up
with this issue.
May I also say that I am grateful and overwhelmed at the number of responses
and the effort that others are putting into examining this problem.
- Original Message -
From: Fernando de
Em 14-01-2014 07:16, Richard escreveu:
- Original Message -
From: Fernando de Oliveira
...
I confirm that flash is not working with WebKitGTK-1.
This is (is a perverse sense) 'wonderful news' because it means that
I am not a complete idiot who has made a mess of things. ...
Of
Em 13-01-2014 14:35, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu:
Forgot to attach the logs.
--
[]s,
Fernando
GtkLauncher-good-flash-LFS7.1.log.xz
Description: Binary data
GtkLauncher-no-flash-LFS7.4.log.xz
Description: Binary data
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ:
Em 11-01-2014 13:10, Richard escreveu:
- Do you happen to know what options you used for configure/make when
building webkitgtk-1.10.2?
- Are you able to post the output of 'lsof -c GtkLauncher' when the
flash page is open? It may help to highlight what is missing.
I confirm that flash is
On 01/13/2014 06:35 PM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
Em 11-01-2014 13:10, Richard escreveu:
- Do you happen to know what options you used for configure/make when
building webkitgtk-1.10.2?
- Are you able to post the output of 'lsof -c GtkLauncher' when the
flash page is open? It may help
On 01/14/2014 12:09 AM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
Em 13-01-2014 18:03, Armin K. escreveu:
On 01/13/2014 06:35 PM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
Em 11-01-2014 13:10, Richard escreveu:
- Do you happen to know what options you used for configure/make when
building webkitgtk-1.10.2?
- Are you
On 01/14/2014 12:12 AM, Armin K. wrote:
On 01/14/2014 12:09 AM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
Em 13-01-2014 18:03, Armin K. escreveu:
On 01/13/2014 06:35 PM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
Em 11-01-2014 13:10, Richard escreveu:
- Do you happen to know what options you used for configure/make
Em 13-01-2014 18:03, Armin K. escreveu:
On 01/13/2014 06:35 PM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
Em 11-01-2014 13:10, Richard escreveu:
- Do you happen to know what options you used for configure/make when
building webkitgtk-1.10.2?
- Are you able to post the output of 'lsof -c GtkLauncher'
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 16:07:23 + (GMT)
From: Richard r_j_humphr...@yahoo.co.uk
To: BLFS Support List blfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
Subject: Re: [blfs-support] WebKitGTK-1/Flash
- Original Message -
From: akhiezer lf...@cruziero.com
...
- meant to add, that if it's just
Em 12-01-2014 12:09, akhiezer escreveu:
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 16:07:23 + (GMT)
From: Richard r_j_humphr...@yahoo.co.uk
To: BLFS Support List blfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
Subject: Re: [blfs-support] WebKitGTK-1/Flash
Some general points to bear in mind, if not already:
Good
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 14:17:22 -0300
From: Fernando de Oliveira fam...@yahoo.com.br
To: BLFS Support List blfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
Subject: Re: [blfs-support] WebKitGTK-1/Flash
.
.
Unfortunately, I do not have lsof.
Another 'tree' ? Very useful diag/info util
akhiezer wrote:
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 14:17:22 -0300
From: Fernando de Oliveira fam...@yahoo.com.br
To: BLFS Support List blfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
Subject: Re: [blfs-support] WebKitGTK-1/Flash
.
.
Unfortunately, I do not have lsof.
Another 'tree' ? Very useful
Em 12-01-2014 15:07, Bruce Dubbs escreveu:
akhiezer wrote:
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 14:17:22 -0300
From: Fernando de Oliveira fam...@yahoo.com.br
To: BLFS Support List blfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
Subject: Re: [blfs-support] WebKitGTK-1/Flash
.
.
Unfortunately, I do not have
On Thu, 2 Jan 2014 16:21:57 +0100
Aleksandar Kuktin akuk...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 02 Jan 2014 12:43:45 +
lf...@cruziero.com (akhiezer) wrote:
I see 'lightspark' mentioned quite often; never tried it, or read up
on it.
I'll check it out next weekend and report back with the
- Original Message -
From: akhiezer lf...@cruziero.com
...
- meant to add, that if it's just no-pasa with flash+uzbl, then if possible
as a fallback-test, build seamonkey/firefox as part of your blfs build
(you'll likely have much of the 'Required' infrastructure already,
in
- Original Message -
From: Fernando de Oliveira fam...@yahoo.com.br
...
I have rebuilt WebKitGTK-1, just to test. Now, to not have to rebuild
again, I am keeping GtkLauncher somwhere. Some tests are done with it
and with midori.
First, tested the url you gave:
Em 11-01-2014 13:10, Richard escreveu:
- Original Message -
From: Fernando de Oliveira fam...@yahoo.com.br
...
I have rebuilt WebKitGTK-1, just to test. Now, to not have to rebuild
again, I am keeping GtkLauncher somwhere. Some tests are done with it
and with midori.
First,
- Original Message -
From: akhiezer lf...@cruziero.com
I know you said in a separate post about having used uzbl mailing lists: but
just to check explicitly, did you try what is discussed in the above
'/2013-.../' threads?
Thanks, I have read all of those.
I have had other
Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2014 15:45:41 +
From: lf...@cruziero.com (akhiezer)
To: BLFS Support List blfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
Subject: Re: [blfs-support] WebKitGTK-1/Flash
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2014 11:33:49 + (GMT)
From: Richard r_j_humphr...@yahoo.co.uk
To: BLFS Support List blfs
- Original Message -
From: Aleksandar Kuktin akuk...@gmail.com
One vital concept comes to mind: does uzbl understand the format that
libflashplayer.so is in? Alternatively, can uzbl use some other plugin
files originally compiled and linked for Firefox/Chromium?
I do not know
- Original Message -
From: akhiezer lf...@cruziero.com
...
Can you list the places where you have got the .so located. Is your system
64-bit?
(as previously mentioned - 32-bit).
# find / -name libflashplayer.so -exec ls -l '{}' \;
-rwxr-xr-x 1 me users 17422820 Dec 27 17:23
- Original Message -
From: akhiezer lf...@cruziero.com
- meant to add, that if it's just no-pasa with flash+uzbl, then if possible
as a fallback-test, build seamonkey/firefox as part of your blfs build
(you'll likely have much of the 'Required' infrastructure already,
in passing),
Firstly, I am grateful for the replies.
Regrettably, so far I have made no progress.
Some comments below...
- Original Message -
From: lux-integ lux-in...@btconnect.com
I have only took a cursory look at this thread so please excuse if I have
missed anything.
I read
Em 02-01-2014 08:33, Richard escreveu:
So, does anybody have any other good ideas? Have I misunderstood some vital
concept?
Again, many thanks, R.
Em 30-12-2013 09:30, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu:
The plugin is not supposed to be installed at /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/.
There are
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2014 11:33:49 + (GMT)
From: Richard r_j_humphr...@yahoo.co.uk
To: BLFS Support List blfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
Subject: Re: [blfs-support] WebKitGTK-1/Flash
Firstly, I am grateful for the replies.
Regrettably, so far I have made no progress.
Some comments
On 01/02/2014 01:43 PM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
Install the plugin at /usr/lib/adobe-flashplugin.
Link to it at /usr/lib/mozilla:
ln -sv ../../adobe-flashplugin/libflashplayer.so /usr/lib/mozilla
If you place the plugin, not the symlink, at /usr/lib/mozilla, it most
probably will not
Em 02-01-2014 09:52, Armin K. escreveu:
On 01/02/2014 01:43 PM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
Install the plugin at /usr/lib/adobe-flashplugin.
Link to it at /usr/lib/mozilla:
ln -sv ../../adobe-flashplugin/libflashplayer.so /usr/lib/mozilla
If you place the plugin, not the symlink, at
From: Fernando de Oliveira fam...@yahoo.com.br
...
Just to be sure we are talking about the same thing, I used GtkLauncher
from webkitgtk-1.10.2.
I'll check later (I'm at work at the moment - without that machine) but I am
sure that is the version (having built
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2014 13:49:17 + (GMT)
From: Richard r_j_humphr...@yahoo.co.uk
Subject: Re: [blfs-support] WebKitGTK-1/Flash
To: akhiezer lf...@cruziero.com,
BLFS Support List blfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
- Original Message -
From: akhiezer lf...@cruziero.com
On Thu, 02 Jan 2014 12:43:45 +
lf...@cruziero.com (akhiezer) wrote:
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2014 11:33:49 + (GMT)
From: Richard r_j_humphr...@yahoo.co.uk
To: BLFS Support List blfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
Subject: Re: [blfs-support] WebKitGTK-1/Flash
I am aware of this and would
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2014 11:33:49 + (GMT)
From: Richard r_j_humphr...@yahoo.co.uk
To: BLFS Support List blfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
Subject: Re: [blfs-support] WebKitGTK-1/Flash
Firstly, I am grateful for the replies.
Regrettably, so far I have made no progress.
Some comments
On Monday 30 December 2013 11:41:26 Richard wrote:
Is there some 'trick' or undocumented procedure for building/using
webkitgtk-1 with flash? Some build flag that I may have missed or variable
which needs to be set?
I have downloaded the appropriate archive from Adobe - with a readme which
lux-integ wrote:
On Monday 30 December 2013 11:41:26 Richard wrote:
Is there some 'trick' or undocumented procedure for building/using
webkitgtk-1 with flash? Some build flag that I may have missed or variable
which needs to be set?
I have downloaded the appropriate archive from Adobe - with
Is there some 'trick' or undocumented procedure for building/using webkitgtk-1
with flash? Some build flag that I may have missed or variable which needs to
be set?
I have downloaded the appropriate archive from Adobe - with a readme which
tells me to put libflashplayer.so in the 'appropriate
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2013 11:41:26 + (GMT)
From: Richard r_j_humphr...@yahoo.co.uk
To: blfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org blfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
Subject: [blfs-support] WebKitGTK-1/Flash
Is there some 'trick' or undocumented procedure for building/using
webkitgtk-1 with flash
Em 30-12-2013 08:41, Richard escreveu:
Is there some 'trick' or undocumented procedure for building/using
webkitgtk-1 with flash? Some build flag that I may have missed or variable
which needs to be set?
I have downloaded the appropriate archive from Adobe - with a readme which
tells me
56 matches
Mail list logo
