After looking at tons of logs of people trying to log into a system
using ssh and guessing usernames and passwords, I've given up trying to
monitor such foolishness. I'd only want to bother to do something like
that in a very high security situation. Perhaps this is a package for
Hardened
Richard Melville wrote:
After looking at tons of logs of people trying to log into a system
using ssh and guessing usernames and passwords, I've given up trying to
monitor such foolishness. I'd only want to bother to do something like
that in a very high security situation. Perhaps this is
On 4 November 2013 07:00, blfs-support-requ...@linuxfromscratch.org wrote:
Send blfs-support mailing list submissions to
Richard Melville wrote:
Does anybody have any experience of noshell as a replacement for
/bin/false
and /dev/null? I realise that it's quite old, but is it still
Simon Geard wrote:
On Sun, 2013-11-03 at 11:03 -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
I'm unaware why noshell would be an advantage over /bin/false. What
does it do that is needed?
Most google results indicate that it's to do with logging - that noshell
will report that someone attempted to obtain a
Does anybody have any experience of noshell as a replacement for /bin/false
and /dev/null? I realise that it's quite old, but is it still useful as a
more secure way of creating a user with no login shell?
Fish.com, together with the titan hardening package, seems to have morphed
into a a
Richard Melville wrote:
Does anybody have any experience of noshell as a replacement for /bin/false
and /dev/null? I realise that it's quite old, but is it still useful as a
more secure way of creating a user with no login shell?
Fish.com, together with the titan hardening package, seems to
On Sun, 2013-11-03 at 11:03 -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
I'm unaware why noshell would be an advantage over /bin/false. What
does it do that is needed?
Most google results indicate that it's to do with logging - that noshell
will report that someone attempted to obtain a shell as a system user,
