On Sat, 2011-11-19 at 10:43 -0800, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
I do not mind about the WARNING and do no sign. In the beginning, I
searched about this and the conclusion was that if someone posted
signatures with wrong intentions it would be spotted, so I waited one
day and then, trusted it.
--- Em sáb, 19/11/11, Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com escreveu:
De: Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com
Assunto: Re: Linux-PAM-1.1.3 and LFS 7.0
Para: BLFS Support List blfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
Data: Sábado, 19 de Novembro de 2011, 20:05
Andrew Benton wrote:
On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 10
--- Em dom, 20/11/11, Simon Geard delga...@ihug.co.nz escreveu:
De: Simon Geard delga...@ihug.co.nz
Assunto: Re: [blfs-support] Linux-PAM-1.1.3 and LFS 7.0
Para: blfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
Data: Domingo, 20 de Novembro de 2011, 6:17
On Sat, 2011-11-19 at 10:43 -0800,
Fernando de
--- Em sex, 18/11/11, Wayne Blaszczyk wblas...@bigpond.net.au escreveu:
De: Wayne Blaszczyk wblas...@bigpond.net.au
Assunto: Re: Linux-PAM-1.1.3 and LFS 7.0
Para: blfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
Data: Sexta-feira, 18 de Novembro de 2011, 19:30
On 19/11/11 02:02, Fernando de
Oliveira wrote
Something should be added:
--- Em sáb, 19/11/11, Fernando de Oliveira fam...@yahoo.com.br escreveu:
De: Fernando de Oliveira fam...@yahoo.com.br
Assunto: Re: Linux-PAM-1.1.3 and LFS 7.0
Para: BLFS Support List blfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
Data: Sábado, 19 de Novembro de 2011, 16:43
On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 10:43:24 -0800 (PST)
Fernando de Oliveira fam...@yahoo.com.br wrote:
These days, most signatures I check with gpg --verify are from previous
versions of packages, so I believe they are trustable (if there is this word
in English).
It looks like a word to me :)
Andy
--
Andrew Benton wrote:
On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 10:43:24 -0800 (PST) Fernando de Oliveira
fam...@yahoo.com.br wrote:
These days, most signatures I check with gpg --verify are from
previous versions of packages, so I believe they are trustable (if
there is this word in English).
It looks like a
--- Em sex, 18/11/11, Wayne Blaszczyk wblas...@bigpond.net.au escreveu:
De: Wayne Blaszczyk wblas...@bigpond.net.au
Assunto: Re: Linux-PAM-1.1.3 and LFS 7.0
Para: blfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
Data: Sexta-feira, 18 de Novembro de 2011, 5:55
On 18/11/11 03:01, Andrew Benton
wrote
Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
Thanks for all the suggestions.
I think I'll stick with the --disable-nis with Linux-PAM-1.1.4 since I
will never use NIS. FYI, version 1.1.3 did not work.
Does any one know where the official download site for Linux-PAM is
located? It seems that all the kernel.org
Martin Ward wrote:
On 18/11/11 18:03, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
Thanks for all the suggestions.
I think I'll stick with the --disable-nis with Linux-PAM-1.1.4 since I
will never use NIS. FYI, version 1.1.3 did not work.
Does any one know where the official download site for
Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
On 19/11/11 02:02, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
--- Em sex, 18/11/11, Wayne Blaszczyk wblas...@bigpond.net.au escreveu:
...
Can
some please post the md5sum for Linux-PAM-1.1.4.tar.bz2. I
just want to
make sure I've downloaded the correct version.
Thanks,
Wayne
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 03:42:12PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
You have to tell gpg which keys *you* trust.
-- Bruce
Anyone got any pointers to an idiot's guide to gpg1, please ? I
installed it for SpamAssassin, which I can see manages to get the
updates to the rules, both from
Ken Moffat wrote:
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 03:42:12PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
You have to tell gpg which keys *you* trust.
-- Bruce
Anyone got any pointers to an idiot's guide to gpg1, please ? I
installed it for SpamAssassin, which I can see manages to get the
updates to the rules,
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 04:09:07PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
See if http://www.gnupg.org/gph/en/manual.html helps.
Specifically
Validating other keys on your public keyring
Trust in a key's owner
Using trust to validate keys
Not on any of the several times I've
Ken Moffat wrote:
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 04:09:07PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
See if http://www.gnupg.org/gph/en/manual.html helps.
Specifically
Validating other keys on your public keyring
Trust in a key's owner
Using trust to validate keys
Not on any of the
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 05:47:28PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
In a WoT there is no single authority, but a lot if transitive
relationships. A trusts B and B vouches for C, so A trusts C. The WoT
can be quite complicated as there are degrees of trust. How sure is A
that he trusts B? A
On 19/11/11 08:42, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Thanks, the reason why I asked for the md5sums was that I'm not familar
with this sign concept.
When I run the verify command,I get the following warning message:
gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
gpg: There
On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 00:00:48 +
Jeremy Henty onepo...@starurchin.org wrote:
Ken Moffat wrote:
If verifying keys means I need to create my own key, [...]
It doesn't. For years I have used GPG/GPG2 to verify keys and I have
never told it to trust my key or anyone else's. The
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 03:26:06AM +0100, Aleksandar Kuktin wrote:
Next, you need to know the identifier of the key. It is a 32-bit
number, expressed in hexadecimal. For example: E608E56E, which is the
identifier for Bryan Kadzban's key.
When trying to verify, if gpg can not find the key,
Hi,
I'm now having trouble with Linux-PAM.
I get the following error:
pam_unix_passwd.c:57:21: fatal error: rpc/rpc.h: No such file or directory
compilation terminated.
make[3]: *** [pam_unix_passwd.lo] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/sources/Linux-PAM-1.1.3/modules/pam_unix'
make[2]: ***
On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 02:06:06 +1100, Wayne Blaszczyk wblas...@bigpond.net.au
wrote:
Hi,
I'm now having trouble with Linux-PAM.
I get the following error:
pam_unix_passwd.c:57:21: fatal error: rpc/rpc.h: No such file or directory
compilation terminated.
make[3]: *** [pam_unix_passwd.lo]
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 02:06:06 +1100
From: wblas...@bigpond.net.au
To: blfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
Subject: Linux-PAM-1.1.3 and LFS 7.0
Hi,
I'm now having trouble with Linux-PAM.
I get the following error:
pam_unix_passwd.c:57:21: fatal
Matthew Burgess schrieb:
On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 02:06:06 +1100, Wayne Blaszczyk wblas...@bigpond.net.au
wrote:
Hi,
I'm now having trouble with Linux-PAM.
I get the following error:
pam_unix_passwd.c:57:21: fatal error: rpc/rpc.h: No such file or directory
compilation terminated.
The gist of the earlier fix was a couple of patches that partially revert
glibc to re-export the rpc interface. I only mention it because I tried it
and it works like a charm. Also required for nfs-utils, which was really
making me upset until I found the solution.
In the long run, hopefully
Thanks for the patch, came in whilst typing my last message. Going to try
it on my dev partition later.
Dan
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Tobias Gasser l...@ebp-gasser.ch wrote:
Matthew Burgess schrieb:
On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 02:06:06 +1100, Wayne Blaszczyk
wblas...@bigpond.net.au wrote:
Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
Hi,
I'm now having trouble with Linux-PAM.
I get the following error:
pam_unix_passwd.c:57:21: fatal error: rpc/rpc.h: No such file or directory
compilation terminated.
make[3]: *** [pam_unix_passwd.lo] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory
26 matches
Mail list logo
