Re: [blfs-support] - To Be or Not To Be

2012-03-13 Thread Simon Geard
On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 19:42 -0500, al...@verizon.net wrote: IMHO, I think the existence of at the end of the first line of the here-document, cat .config HERE_DOC is not desired. Can you elaborate? It looks fine to me... what problem do you see? Simon. signature.asc Description: This

Re: [blfs-support] - To Be or Not To Be

2012-03-13 Thread alupu
On 03/13/12 at 5:16 AM, Simon Geard wrote: On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 19:42 Alex wrote: IMHO, I think the existence of at the end of the first line of the here-document, cat .config HERE_DOC is not desired. Can you elaborate? It looks fine to me... what problem do you see? Hi Simon,

Re: [blfs-support] btrfs and raid

2012-03-13 Thread luxInteg
On Monday 12 March 2012 23:09:36 Bruce Dubbs wrote: ext4 is limited to 16T *for one file*. The fs can be 1E (1,000,000 TB). I don't think I'll hit that limit for a while. :) I tried a few months ago making an 18Tbyte RAID with ext4 and had to abandon it. I kept getting kernel

Re: [blfs-support] - To Be or Not To Be

2012-03-13 Thread Rick Shelton
_As an aside_, I noticed there are many script aficionados among (B)LFS users and I suppose the concept in the book instructions helps them a lot. (command1 command2 ...) I am one of (or maybe unique among) the people what like to take their time between commands (and append ; echo $?