On Tue, 2005-10-25 at 20:56 +1300, Simon Geard wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 21:11 -0600, Dennis J Perkins wrote:
> > I've found that gdm doesn't call .xinitrc for some reason, so
> > dbus-launch never runs.
> >
>
> Ah, you're using GDM to start Gnome - I'd missed that. In that case, try
> the a
After digging around, I couldn't find any info other than what debian
gave. I've weeded out their extra junk and made an LFS-conforming patch
for anyone who uses sudo. I've also emailed the sudo list for their take
on this vulnerability and it's proposed fix.
--
Archaic
Want control, education,
Thus spoke Dan Nicholson:
> Step up to 1.0.1. It built cleanly with no patching, and it found all
> my multitude of plugins. With the exception of libpostproc (from
> MPlayer). Here's the configure statement I used:
> ./configure --prefix=/usr --enable-netstrem --enable-libpostproc \
> --en
On 10/25/05, Simon Scheiwiller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the original 0.6.14 line is:
> current_word = *((uint_32*)buffer_start)++;
> i remove the cast and change it back to the 0.6.12 version:
> current_word = *(buffer_start)++;
Step up to 1.0.1. It built cleanly with no patch
On 10/25/05, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 10/25/05 17:28 CST:
> I ran into this last time I installed Transcode. Another alternative
> for the OP is to install the most recent version of Transcode. They
> are up to 1.0.1 as of now. You can find it a
More problems here:
first, I get that error:
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -Wall -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE
-D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -g -O2 -MT bitstream.lo -MD
-MP -MF .deps/bitstream.Tpo -c bitstream.c -fPIC -DPIC -o
.libs/bitstream.o
In file included from bitstream.c:36:
bits
Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 10/25/05 17:28 CST:
> Ahh. I've never used LZO or even knew there were multiple versions of
> it.
I ran into this last time I installed Transcode. Another alternative
for the OP is to install the most recent version of Transcode. They
are up to 1.0.1 as of now.
Thus spoke Dan Nicholson:
> On 10/25/05, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Changing the defaults may not work however. The problem is because
>> I believe Transcode wants LZO-1 and the OP has LZO-2 installed.
>>
>> Sometimes, just getting configure to "see" the changes isn't enough.
>>
>
On 10/25/05, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Changing the defaults may not work however. The problem is because
> I believe Transcode wants LZO-1 and the OP has LZO-2 installed.
>
> Sometimes, just getting configure to "see" the changes isn't enough.
>
> There is a reason the LZO mainta
Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 10/25/05 17:10 CST:
> On 10/25/05, Simon Scheiwiller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>the configure script for transcode 0.6.14 looks for the lzo headers in
>>/usr/include. when i pass the option --with-lzo-includes=/usr/include/lzo,
>>it looks for the headers in /
On 10/25/05, Simon Scheiwiller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the configure script for transcode 0.6.14 looks for the lzo headers in
> /usr/include. when i pass the option --with-lzo-includes=/usr/include/lzo,
> it looks for the headers in /usr/include/lzo/include.
> is there a patch for transcode fo
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 05:54:47AM +0100, Declan Moriarty wrote:
>
> /begin nag
Well some would say that you are being mean/rude/whatever. I, however,
think you stated exactly what needed to be said in a manner is strong
enough to stand out and make people take notice. Well done, sir.
--
Archai
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 02:45:16PM +0200, Jonas Norlander wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 08:32:41PM +0200, channelzero wrote:
> > Am Montag 24 Oktober 2005 18:01 schrieb Jonas Norlander:
> > > Any idea why I got this error in make check?
> >
> > Do you have dejagnu package installed?
> >
>
> Y
On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 08:32:41PM +0200, channelzero wrote:
> Am Montag 24 Oktober 2005 18:01 schrieb Jonas Norlander:
> > Any idea why I got this error in make check?
>
> Do you have dejagnu package installed?
>
Yes it is installed.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# runtest --version
WARNING: Couldn't fin
Hi again
I had this with a canon bjc4000.
Everyone told me I had the wrong ppd file. I never solved it.
I was printing locally, so I had other options. I went away and never
came back.
Well, in my case it was the 'wrong' ppd file that was the issue. I
noticed that on Slackware (where everyth
On 10/25/05, Rainer Peter Feller
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-10-25 at 11:39 +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> > Probably because *nobody* here knows anything about libc5.
> or nobody wants to admit that s/he is that old that s/he knows anything
> about libc5
Grazie
Luca
--
http://linuxfro
On Tue, 2005-10-25 at 11:39 +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Oct 2005, Luca Dionisi wrote:
>
> > I was just wondering: have I said something wrong in my previous
> > post in this thread?
> > Why no answers from anyone in ten days?
> >
> > Luca
>
> Probably because *nobody* here knows anyth
On Tue, 25 Oct 2005, Luca Dionisi wrote:
I was just wondering: have I said something wrong in my previous
post in this thread?
Why no answers from anyone in ten days?
Luca
Probably because *nobody* here knows anything about libc5.
Ken
--
das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce
Hi
You can do the same thing in cups with
lpadmin -p jerrypc -m laserjet.ppd.gz -v socket://[ip_address].
The only trick is finding the correct ppd for your printer. The conversion
problem is pretty much the same for cups or lprng.
Cheers for your reply jerry.
But I think my issue is with
Recently, Somebody Somewhere wrote these words
> I was just wondering: have I said something wrong in my previous
> post in this thread?
> Why no answers from anyone in ten days?
>
Ok. Take as much from the list below as fits.
/begin nag
This list works by people volunteering personal time to h
On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 21:11 -0600, Dennis J Perkins wrote:
> I've found that gdm doesn't call .xinitrc for some reason, so
> dbus-launch never runs.
>
Ah, you're using GDM to start Gnome - I'd missed that. In that case, try
the attached patch, which modifies GDM's Xsession file to run
dbus-launch
I was just wondering: have I said something wrong in my previous
post in this thread?
Why no answers from anyone in ten days?
Luca
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
22 matches
Mail list logo
