On 4/3/07, Ken Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If you aren't on multilib, you _really_ don't want lib64 in your
system - apart from popt, presence of lib64 on non-multilib is
usually down to user error, or perhaps a side-effect of trying to
use proprietary video drivers.
Thanks for the tip,
Scott Czepiel wrote:
> I know this has been done successfully, but there are a few special
> tricks to make it work. I was hoping someone could point me to a
> "Read this first" link to get started. Many thanks,
> czep
The following is what I used to stumble through the build. 2.0.0.2
cat > .m
On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 12:43:04AM -0700, Scott Czepiel wrote:
> One problem fixed: found xft.pc in /usr/X11R6/lib64/pkgconfig and needed to
> add this to PKG_CONFIG_PATH.
>
> Next problem: multiple link errors in gtk2xtbin.o. I wonder if this is an
> x86_64 issue or it could relate to the --en
did you do --enable-default-toolkit=gtk ??.That also brought up lots of
error for me.
for me, the configure script could find out the right files without the
option,but not if i passed it a default toolkit options.
On 4/3/07, anirudh vij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
hi,
try --disable-canvas.As i
hi,
try --disable-canvas.As i said,i could'nt build 2.0 with it.I dont think
you'll use it much anyway,though i may be wrong.
does the --with-qt option work?
On 4/3/07, Simon Geard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 2007-04-03 at 00:08 -0700, Scott Czepiel wrote:
> Thank you for your suggestions
On Tue, 2007-04-03 at 00:08 -0700, Scott Czepiel wrote:
> Thank you for your suggestions. I installed all the dependencies, but
> on make I have run into a problem:
>
> "Package xft not found in pkg-config search path." It suggests adding
> the path to "xft.pc" to PKG_CONFIG_PATH, but I can't fi
One problem fixed: found xft.pc in /usr/X11R6/lib64/pkgconfig and needed to
add this to PKG_CONFIG_PATH.
Next problem: multiple link errors in gtk2xtbin.o. I wonder if this is an
x86_64 issue or it could relate to the --enable-canvas option. Will try
more tomorrow.
czep
On 4/3/07, Scott Cze
Thank you for your suggestions. I installed all the dependencies, but on
make I have run into a problem:
"Package xft not found in pkg-config search path." It suggests adding the
path to "xft.pc" to PKG_CONFIG_PATH, but I can't find xft.pc anywhere on my
system, even though I assume it should b
hi,
i build firefox yesterday,and had to turn off --enable-canvas to build
without problems.
with the --enable-canvas option on i got some errors like x-headers not
found(even though i passed in the --with-x-includes and --with-x-lib).
and follow the blfs book so far as the .mozconfig file goes.I
On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 10:18:19PM +0200, Wilco Beekhuizen wrote:
> You can pretty much follow the BLFS instructions.
> You don't need the two patches, but you need the sed statement and
> this extra sed:
> sed -i "[EMAIL PROTECTED] += \$(MOZ_GTK2_LIBS)@& -L/usr/X11R6/lib
> -lXrender -lX11@" layout
2007/4/2, Scott Czepiel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I know this has been done successfully, but there are a few special tricks
> to make it work. I was hoping someone could point me to a "Read this first"
> link to get started. Many thanks,
> czep
>
> --
> http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/
Scott Czepiel wrote these words on 04/02/07 13:08 CST:
> I know this has been done successfully, but there are a few special tricks
> to make it work. I was hoping someone could point me to a "Read this first"
> link to get started.
I'm not aware of anything out there (actually, only the book sho
I know this has been done successfully, but there are a few special tricks
to make it work. I was hoping someone could point me to a "Read this first"
link to get started. Many thanks,
czep
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/fa
I've succesfully built firefox 2.0. I had to update my NSS libraries
and use the sed statement for X includes, as suggested by the list.
Furthermore I used the default mozconfig as in the BLFS book for
firefox 1.5.0.7 and deleted ~/.mozilla before starting firefox 2.0.
So far (the last few
On 11/6/06, Alan Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andrey Voropaev wrote:
> ...The error in parsing browser.xul is even funnier. In the sources
> browser.xul doesn't even have the lines that are reported as being
> wrong. Somewhere I've seen recommendation to
> delete .mozilla directory before sta
Andrey Voropaev wrote:
...The error in parsing browser.xul is even funnier. In the sources
browser.xul doesn't even have the lines that are reported as being
wrong. Somewhere I've seen recommendation to
delete .mozilla directory before starting firefox, I'll try it tonight :)
Hi Andrey, I had
On 11/5/06, Hans-Joachim Widmaier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andrey Voropaev wrote:
> Amazing. After building firefox on x86_64 with older version of BLFS,
> I've tried it on i686 with newer version of BLFS. And it failed! The
> mozconfig was exactly the same. Looks like the problem could be in t
Andrey Voropaev wrote:
> Amazing. After building firefox on x86_64 with older version of BLFS,
> I've tried it on i686 with newer version of BLFS. And it failed! The
> mozconfig was exactly the same. Looks like the problem could be in the
> fact that I have gtk-2.8 on the newer system.
> [snip]
> u
Amazing. After building firefox on x86_64 with older version of BLFS,
I've tried it on i686 with newer version of BLFS. And it failed! The
mozconfig was exactly the same. Looks like the problem could be in the
fact that I have gtk-2.8 on the newer system.
Here's the error.
c++ -I/usr/include -fr
Andrey Voropaev wrote:
> With the tips from this thread, I was able to compile and run firefox
> 2.0 on x86_64 system.
> I just had to add
>
> ac_cv_visibility_pragma=no
>
> to mozconfig to avoid error messages about relocating symbols.
Just finished the build (had to upda
same error,
albeit with a different symbol: R_386_GOTOFF. FF-2.0 looks like a rather
strange beast to compile. But it looks quite good when running. ;-)
I'd be glad to hear from you in case you find a solution to this problem.
With the tips from this thread, I was able t
Wilco Beekhuizen wrote:
> Nice to see some of you guys can actually compile it. I'm trying to
> compile it (using the 1.5.x mozconfig) but compilation fails pretty soon
> (using gcc 4.1.1) with a relocation error:
> unresolvable relocation against symbol `PR_LocalTimeParameters'
>
> I can't find a
Alberto Hernando wrote:
El Lunes, 30 de Octubre de 2006 11:11, Alan Lord escribió:
Alberto, do you have Java on your machine?
Yes. I have jdk, because I thought I needed it for kde, but only the binary
package. Very easy to install. But I have had it all the time and had xul and
xml problems
2006/10/30, Alberto Hernando <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
El Lunes, 30 de Octubre de 2006 11:11, Alan Lord escribió:> Alberto, do you have Java on your machine?Yes. I have jdk, because I thought I needed it for kde, but only the binarypackage. Very easy to install. But I have had it all the time and had xu
El Lunes, 30 de Octubre de 2006 11:11, Alan Lord escribió:
> Alberto, do you have Java on your machine?
Yes. I have jdk, because I thought I needed it for kde, but only the binary
package. Very easy to install. But I have had it all the time and had xul and
xml problems too, so I don't know.
Alberto Hernando wrote:
El Lunes, 30 de Octubre de 2006 10:33, Wilco Beekhuizen escribió:
Nice to see some of you guys can actually compile it. I'm trying to compile
it (using the 1.5.x mozconfig) but compilation fails pretty soon (using gcc
4.1.1) with a relocation error:
unresolvable relocatio
El Lunes, 30 de Octubre de 2006 10:33, Wilco Beekhuizen escribió:
> Nice to see some of you guys can actually compile it. I'm trying to compile
> it (using the 1.5.x mozconfig) but compilation fails pretty soon (using gcc
> 4.1.1) with a relocation error:
> unresolvable relocation against symbol `P
Nice to see some of you guys can actually compile it. I'm trying to compile it (using the 1.5.x mozconfig) but compilation fails pretty soon (using gcc 4.1.1) with a relocation error:unresolvable relocation against symbol `PR_LocalTimeParameters'
I can't find a solution to this problem. I'm using a
So can you get FF-2.0 to build and run without the XML Parser error, bydisabling --with-system-cairo?
Hi.Tonight I've done my last compile. The important part of my .mozconf goes here:. $topsrcdir/browser/config/mozconfigmk_add_options [EMAIL PROTECTED]@/../firefox-build
ac_add_options --prefix=/us
alberto hernando wrote:
Hi.
Hi :-)
I don't have a good idea. But before applying your fix, I only could
build firefox without system-cairo. Then, the build was fine and, what
is more important, it run. But I still had problems (gmail didn't work
well, it happened before with ff-1.5.07) and
2006/10/29, Alan Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I think Firefox itself is O.K but it won't load yet. I get a
> "XML Parsing Error: undefined entity.
> Location: chrome://browser/content/browser.xul"
.." message and then it stops. Googling
> shows me this is a very common error, am looking into it..
d into this someway and can't make any sense of why
this should be happening. browser.xul is, I believe, stored inside
/usr/lib/firefox-2.0/chrome/browser.jar.
But I somehow doubt if the error is actually in that file... This was a
checked tarball from the mozilla site and googling for t
alberto hernando wrote:
Hi.
Thanks for your fix. I'm going to test it because I had the same problem.
About that it doesn't run... have you noticed that:
ac_add_options --with-system-png=usr/lib
You missed a "/". Might it be the reason?
Alberto
Thanks for that! I hadn't noticed... It cer
On Sat, 2006-10-28 at 20:43 +0100, Alan Lord wrote:
> The build failed several times with an "Undefined Reference to
> XFreePixmap..." message. After playing about with a few settings in my
> mozconfig I did a bit more digging. It turns out there is a problem with
> the build process finding and
Hi.
Thanks for your fix. I'm going to test it because I had the same problem.
About that it doesn't run... have you noticed that:
ac_add_options --with-system-png=usr/lib
You missed a "/". Might it be the reason?
Alberto
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http
hey,do you know any good pupunder code which can break through the sp2/IE?
have a good day
gu
On 10/28/06, Alan Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,I have just built FF2 on a very recent LFS/BLFS system.At the end of this post is my .mozconfig FYI.
The build failed several times with an "Undefi
Alan Lord wrote:
Hi all,
I have just built FF2 on a very recent LFS/BLFS system.
At the end of this post is my .mozconfig FYI.
Sorry forgot the mozconfig...
===Begin mozconfig
#
# See http://www.mozilla.org/build/ for build instructions.
#
# Options for client.mk.
mk
Hi all,
I have just built FF2 on a very recent LFS/BLFS system.
At the end of this post is my .mozconfig FYI.
The build failed several times with an "Undefined Reference to
XFreePixmap..." message. After playing about with a few settings in my
mozconfig I did a bit more digging. It turns out
38 matches
Mail list logo
