Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Deprecate and remove Theora support.

LGTM1 to deprecate and remove. RIP Theora, we hardly knew ye. On 10/24/23 1:01 PM, Dale Curtis wrote: On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 4:49 AM Mike Taylor wrote: On 10/23/23 1:13 PM, Dale Curtis wrote: On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 10:02 AM Mike Taylor wrote: On 10/23/23 11:54 AM

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS and Syntax for registered Custom Properties

Understood - thanks! LGTM1 On 10/24/23 9:16 AM, Rune Lillesveen wrote: On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 1:58 AM Mike Taylor wrote: Hey Rune, On 10/20/23 9:30 AM, Rune Lillesveen wrote: Contact emails futh...@chromium.org, andr...@chromium.org Explainer

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Private Network Access permission to relax mixed content

Thanks - LGTM to experiment from 120 to 123 inclusive. On 10/24/23 3:47 AM, Yifan Luo wrote: Hello Mike, Sure and done. Yifan On Tuesday, October 24, 2023 at 1:36:32 AM UTC+2 blink-dev wrote: Hi Yifan, Could you please request Privacy, Security, and Debuggability reviews in the

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Deprecate and remove Theora support.

On 10/23/23 1:13 PM, Dale Curtis wrote: On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 10:02 AM Mike Taylor wrote: On 10/23/23 11:54 AM, Dale Curtis wrote: Hmm, not sure why the description got reflowed, here's the formatted version: Chrome will deprecate and remove support for the Theora video

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS and Syntax for registered Custom Properties

Hey Rune, On 10/20/23 9:30 AM, Rune Lillesveen wrote: Contact emails futh...@chromium.org, andr...@chromium.org Explainer None Specification https://drafts.css-houdini.org/css-properties-values-api-1/#syntax-strings Summary Supports using the and

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Private Network Access permission to relax mixed content

Hi Yifan, Could you please request Privacy, Security, and Debuggability reviews in the chromestatus entry? thanks, Mike On 10/20/23 9:49 AM, 'Yifan Luo' via blink-dev wrote: Contact emails l...@chromium.org, cl...@chromium.org Explainer

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Experiment: IP Protection Phase 0

Hi Eric, Sure - we will have more details about which domains will be proxied as we get past the experimentation phases and sent an Intent to Ship. thanks, Mike On 10/23/23 5:21 PM, Eric Browning wrote: Please publish the domains this feature will use so that school and district admins may

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Experiment: IP Protection Phase 0

Hi Pete, Yes, users will be able to turn the feature off. See: https://github.com/GoogleChrome/ip-protection/issues/16 https://support.google.com/chrome/a/answer/7679408?sjid=15843372962730454051-NA#upChromeBrsrX118 thanks, Mike On 10/23/23 3:21 PM, Pete Stergion wrote: Will we be able to

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Deprecate and remove Theora support.

On 10/23/23 11:54 AM, Dale Curtis wrote: Hmm, not sure why the description got reflowed, here's the formatted version: Chrome will deprecate and remove support for the Theora video codec in desktop Chrome due to emerging security risks. Theora's low (and now often incorrect) usage no longer

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: CSS Scrollbars: scrollbar-color, scrollbar-width

LGTM2 On 10/23/23 5:54 AM, Yoav Weiss wrote: LGTM1 On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 10:14 AM Luke wrote: > I'm guessing we're missing ways to test if the styles were applied. Is that correct? > If so, can you file relevant WPT bugs to make sure we'd be able to expand coverage in the

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to ship: Interoperable Pointer and Mouse boundary events after DOM changes

Hi Mustaq, Please take a moment to request the other review bits (API OWNERs will wait until those are in progress to begin our review). See https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/bqvB1oap0Yc/m/YlO8DEHgAQAJ for more info. thanks! Mike On 10/19/23 3:41 PM, Mustaq Ahmed

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: IP Protection Phase 0

On 10/20/23 3:41 AM, 'Thomas Steiner' via blink-dev wrote: In the attached document , there are (at first sight) three domains of long-dead Google services: inbox.google.com

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Experiment: IP Protection Phase 0

ETF about this change, I worry that it will be received poorly. On Thu, Oct 19, 2023, 7:15 PM Mike Taylor wrote: I'm recused from voting on this feature so with my API OWNER hat off (or maybe just back and to the side to make me look cool...), it's

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Experiment: IP Protection Phase 0

I'm recused from voting on this feature so with my API OWNER hat off (or maybe just back and to the side to make me look cool...), it's possible that we submit an FYI review in the future ahead of an I2S. That said, this is a feature that arguably does not materially alter web platform APIs,

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Protected Audience Bidding & Auction Services

proposed end milestone will be? I hope the Origin Trial to last M119 through M121, though I strongly suspect I'll need to extend this further to provide sufficient time to test. On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 12:04 PM Mike Taylor wrote: Hi Paul, Can you clarify what the proposed e

Re: [blink-dev] Re: PSA: Web MIDI Permissions Prompt Change

LGTM3 (if you need it...) On 10/18/23 2:32 PM, Chris Harrelson wrote: LGTM2 On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 1:31 PM Hongchan Choi wrote: Yes - we are thinking about publishing a short developer-facing article about Chrome's permission change when the implementation is ready.

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Protected Audience Bidding & Auction Services

Hi Paul, Can you clarify what the proposed end milestone will be? thanks, Mike On 10/13/23 10:46 AM, Chris Harrelson wrote: Please fill out and start the reviews for Privacy, Security and Debuggability in your chromestatus entry, thanks. On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 3:40 PM Paul Jensen wrote:

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: PointerEvent.deviceId for Mult-Pen Inking

Apologies, I missed that there wasn't yet a spec. I'll retract my LGTM until then. On 10/17/23 4:16 AM, Yoav Weiss wrote: On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 12:42 AM Mike Taylor wrote: LGTM1 On 10/15/23 11:07 AM, 'Sahir Vellani' via blink-dev wrote: Thanks for the feedback, I wasn't

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: PointerEvent.deviceId for Mult-Pen Inking

LGTM1 On 10/15/23 11:07 AM, 'Sahir Vellani' via blink-dev wrote: Thanks for the feedback, I wasn't aware they were mandatory. The steps have been started, just awaiting feedback from Security and Privacy reviewers. I've received LGTMs for all other areas. After our response to WebKit's

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Attribution Reporting API feature (aggregation coordinator selection)

LGTM1 On 10/16/23 7:48 AM, Nan Lin wrote: Thanks Mike, please see the inline comment. On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 10:41 AM Mike Taylor wrote: Interoperability and Compatibility The change is backwards compatible, and allows developers to select the deployment option

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Attribution Reporting API feature (aggregation coordinator selection)

On 10/16/23 7:57 AM, Nan Lin wrote: A few more inline comments, thanks! On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 10:41 AM Mike Taylor wrote: Hi Nan, a few questions inline: On 10/6/23 8:45 AM, Nan Lin wrote: Contact emails lin...@chromium.org <mailto:lin...@chromium.

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Re-implement and Ship: CSS Font Loading API - FontFaceSet: check() method

LGTM2 On 10/16/23 1:35 PM, Alex Russell wrote: LGTM1 On Sun, Oct 15, 2023 at 1:01 PM ChangSeok Oh wrote: Contact emails changseok...@bytedance.com,shivami...@gmail.com Specification https://drafts.csswg.org/css-font-loading/#font-face-set-check Summary The

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Attribution Reporting API feature (aggregation coordinator selection)

Hi Nan, a few questions inline: On 10/6/23 8:45 AM, Nan Lin wrote: Contact emails lin...@chromium.org , johni...@chromium.org Explainer Attribution Reporting with event-level reports

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype and Ship: URL.canParse

LGTM1 On 10/13/23 6:08 PM, Jeremy Roman wrote: Contact emails jbro...@chromium.org Explainer None Specification https://url.spec.whatwg.org/#dom-url-canparse Summary A static operation to determine whether a URL string is valid. More concise than

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate and Remove: Same-origin blanket enforcement in CSPEE

LGTM2 On 10/13/23 1:32 PM, chrishtr via Chromestatus wrote: LGTM -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "blink-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org. To view this

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Web app scope extensions

review categories (security, privacy, debuggability) in chromestatus. On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 7:13 AM Mike Taylor wrote: Hi there, Could you clarify which milestones you would like to run the experiment on? thanks,

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Shared Storage API Enhancements

LGTM3 On 10/11/23 10:45 AM, Chris Harrelson wrote: LGTM2 On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 7:32 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: LGTM1 On Friday, October 6, 2023 at 4:41:48 PM UTC+2 Mike Taylor wrote: Thanks Jason! And yes, Cammie (and team), please request approval bits

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Web app scope extensions

Hi there, Could you clarify which milestones you would like to run the experiment on? thanks, Mike On 10/11/23 6:05 AM, 'Lu Huang' via blink-dev wrote: Contact emails lu...@microsoft.com, luigo...@microsoft.com, alancut...@chromium.org Explainer

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: MediaStreamTrack Stats

Also, could you please create a chromestatus entry and request the various review gate bits? On 10/11/23 10:08 AM, Mike Taylor wrote: LGTM2 On 10/11/23 8:49 AM, Philip Jägenstedt wrote: LGTM1, this is a minor addition to an existing API, was discussed in the WG at TPAC, and has a positive

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: MediaStreamTrack Stats

LGTM2 On 10/11/23 8:49 AM, Philip Jägenstedt wrote: LGTM1, this is a minor addition to an existing API, was discussed in the WG at TPAC, and has a positive standards position from Mozilla. On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 4:16 PM Henrik Boström wrote: *Contant emails:* h...@chromium.org,

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: CSS Syntax for registered Custom Properties

LGTM2 On 10/11/23 7:06 AM, Daniel Bratell wrote: LGTM1 (Privacy and Security steps in Chromestatus are not completed but they are unlikely to affect anything) /Daniel On 2023-10-04 12:23, Rune Lillesveen wrote: On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 11:08 AM Rune Lillesveen wrote:

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: HTMLSelectElement showPicker()

LGTM2, same condition. On 10/11/23 7:16 AM, Daniel Bratell wrote: LGTM1 (dependent on the PR landing) Looks like the spec text is more or less complete with no remaining possible showstoppers. I do find it both amusing and a bit Kafkaesque that the web community seems to have a process

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Origin Trial: Cross App and Web Attribution Measurement M120-M123

LGTM to extend from 120 to 122 inclusive. On 10/6/23 1:43 PM, Nan Lin wrote: Thanks Chris. Since the original OT request, we have spec'd most of the cross app and web algorithms: https://wicg.github.io/attribution-reporting-api/#cross-app-and-web. The Cross App and Web Attribution

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: PointerEvent.deviceId for Mult-Pen Inking

On 10/4/23 7:43 PM, 'Sahir Vellani' via blink-dev wrote: Contact emails gerch...@microsoft.com , sahir.vell...@microsoft.com Explainer

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Deprecate and Remove: Same-origin blanket enforcement in CSPEE

Also, please request cross-functional review bits in the chromestatus entries. On 10/6/23 10:59 AM, Mike Taylor wrote: LGTM2 On 10/4/23 6:38 AM, Yoav Weiss wrote: LGTM1 Usage seems low enough to make this safe still. On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 2:24:11 AM UTC+2 Jun Kokatsu wrote

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Deprecate and Remove: Same-origin blanket enforcement in CSPEE

LGTM2 On 10/4/23 6:38 AM, Yoav Weiss wrote: LGTM1 Usage seems low enough to make this safe still. On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 2:24:11 AM UTC+2 Jun Kokatsu wrote: Contact emails jkoka...@google.com Explainer None Specification

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS :dir() pseudo-class selector

LGTM2 (or 5??) On 10/4/23 5:28 AM, Manuel Rego Casasnovas wrote: LGTM1 Just for context, this was already approved 3 years ago: https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/p0Wc66rbVOc/m/khHJ0dSsAwAJ But then we realized the spec text was not ready, there were some

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Shared Storage API Enhancements

Thanks Jason! And yes, Cammie (and team), please request approval bits in Chromestatus - API OWNERs will wait on that (not approvals, just beginning the process for each) before approving. thanks, Mike On 10/4/23 9:08 PM, 'Jason Robbins' via blink-dev wrote: At this morning's API Owners

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Private Aggregation API bundled enhancements

, 2023 at 11:08:43 PM UTC+2 Mike Taylor wrote: Hey Alex, Apologies for the delay. It would probably be good to make a new entry and request all the relevant review approvals (sorry for the extra work). Also

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Unprefix -webkit-background-clip for "text" and make it an alias

LGTM2, can you also please request reviews for the other categories in chromestatus (and file any relevant issues in the compat spec, if needed)? On 9/28/23 1:16 PM, Daniil Sakhapov wrote: Sure, I'm saying that old -webkit-background-clip works with keywords: border, content, padding. The new

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Intersection Observer Scroll Margin

LGTM1 On 9/29/23 8:04 PM, Traian Captan wrote: Hi Alex, Just in case, I file a TAG review issue: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/905 Regards, Traian On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 2:22 PM Traian Captan wrote: Hi Alex, The much larger intersection observer feature went

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Private Aggregation API bundled enhancements

Hey Alex, Apologies for the delay. It would probably be good to make a new entry and request all the relevant review approvals (sorry for the extra work). Also, probably useful to drop a link in the TAG review to this Intent, so reviewers can eventually be aware of these changes. On

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Protected Audiences Negative Targeting

LGTM1 % landing https://github.com/WICG/turtledove/pull/796. Please follow up with the WPTs as well. On 9/27/23 11:56 AM, Chris Harrelson wrote: Please fill out the other chromestatus review categories (privacy, security, etc); we'll re-review once those are done. On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at

[blink-dev] PSA: Enabling partitioned 3rd party storage when “Block 3rd Party Cookies” setting is enabled

** *Howdy blink-dev, * * In https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/4899223 we intend to enable the 3rd party storage partitioning feature when 3rd party cookies (3PCs) are disabled, given that 3rd party storage partitioning is enabled for 100% of M115 and above.

Re: [blink-dev] PSA: Fire beforeinput event before compositionupdate event during IME composition.

Hi there - Given that this change is web observable, have you all done any compatibility testing or analysis to ensure sites aren't relying on the differences between engines here (hopefully not, but you know...)? On 9/25/23 7:59 PM, 'Siye Liu' via blink-dev wrote: Hi blink-dev, We've been

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Change SVGClipPathElement to inherit from SVGElement

LGTM3 On 9/22/23 9:59 AM, Chris Harrelson wrote: LGTM2 On Fri, Sep 22, 2023, 5:40 AM Daniel Bratell wrote: Aligning all the browsers is a good thing. Risk seems small enough to just do it. LGTM1 /Daniel On 2023-09-22 12:00, Fredrik Söderquist wrote:

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: WebRTC Codec Selection API

LGTM2 On 9/21/23 5:31 AM, 'Philipp Hancke' via blink-dev wrote: Am Do., 21. Sept. 2023 um 10:43 Uhr schrieb Florent Castelli : On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 5:21 PM Yoav Weiss wrote: LGTM1 On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 11:48 AM Florent Castelli wrote:

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Horizontal rules inside select elements

LGTM2 On 9/20/23 12:41 PM, Joey Arhar wrote: For developer signals: The material design menu component supports dividers like this: https://m2.material.io/components/menus#anatomy:~:text=Text-,Divider,-Text%20and%20icon Bootstrap has a "dropdown-divider" class for the "dropdown-menu" class

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Protected Audience directFromSellerSignals via HTTP response headers

presumably, having that as a limit doesn't mean most responses would actually use that. On Sat, Sep 16, 2023 at 6:52 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 10:00 PM Mike Taylor wrote: Thanks, LGTM1 pending the PRs landing. On 9/12

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Prototype And Ship: Allow transferring ArrayBuffer into VideoFrame, AudioData, EncodedVideoChunk, EncodedAudioChunk, ImageDecoder constructors

LGTM3 On 9/20/23 11:48 AM, Chris Harrelson wrote: LGTM2 Would be great to file official vendor signals just so they know this is happening, if you're willing. On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 7:41 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: LGTM1 given the consistency here with other platform APIs and the need

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Private Network Access restrictions for automotive

LGTM1. Curious to know (but happy to not know) how many local servers are running in my car... On 9/18/23 5:30 AM, Jonathan Hao wrote: Contact emails p...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/WICG/private-network-access/blob/main/explainer.md

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Attribution Reporting features (change registration limit, remove 1hr delay)

LGTM2 On 9/16/23 10:28 AM, Yoav Weiss wrote: LGTM1 On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 10:58 PM 'Akash Nadan' via blink-dev wrote: Contact emails johni...@chromium.org, csharri...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/WICG/attribution-reporting-api/blob/main/EVENT.md

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: WebAssembly Garbage Collection (WasmGC)

LGTM2 - thanks Adam. On 9/16/23 7:39 AM, Yoav Weiss wrote: LGTM1 On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 11:13 PM Adam Klein wrote: Thanks for the reply, Mike. I'm going to fill in some of this to avoid blocking over the weekend. On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 1:26 PM Mike Taylor wrote

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Promise.withResolvers

LGTM2 On 9/16/23 8:22 AM, Yoav Weiss wrote: LGTM1 Very neat!! That would definitely have simplified some testing code I recently wrote :) On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 1:50 AM 'Shu-yu Guo' via blink-dev wrote: Contact emails s...@chromium.org Explainer

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype and Ship: Clip-path xywh() and rect() values

Cool - thanks for the answers. LGTM3. On 9/16/23 6:23 AM, Yoav Weiss wrote: LGTM2 On Sat, Sep 16, 2023, 02:20 'Philip Rogers' via blink-dev wrote: On Friday, September 15, 2023 at 1:19:06 PM UTC-7 Mike Taylor wrote: On 9/11/23 7:18 PM, Philip Rogers wrote: Contact

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: WebAssembly Garbage Collection (WasmGC)

On 9/12/23 9:22 PM, 'Emanuel Ziegler' via blink-dev wrote: Dear API owners, Following the continued experiment for Garbage Collected WebAssembly (WasmGC), we plan to ship the feature in M119 after the positive vote to phase 4 by the WebAssembly

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype and Ship: Clip-path xywh() and rect() values

On 9/11/23 7:18 PM, Philip Rogers wrote: Contact emails p...@chromium.org Explainer None Specification https://www.w3.org/TR/css-shapes/#supported-basic-shapes Summary Support the xywh() and rect() values on clip-path, which make it easier to specify

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: TLS Encrypted Client Hello (ECH)

On 9/11/23 6:34 PM, 'David Adrian' via blink-dev wrote: Contact emails david...@chromium.org, dadr...@google.com Explainer None Specification https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-tls-esni Summary The TLS Encrypted ClientHello (ECH)

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Protected Audience directFromSellerSignals via HTTP response headers

, whereas the spec change describes how to implement the header-based version. We intend to land all 3 pull requests. Thanks, -Caleb On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 11:18:26 AM UTC-4 Mike Taylor wrote: On 9/11/23 12:55 PM, Mike Taylor wrote: On 9/7/23 6:00 PM, Caleb Raitto wrote:

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Japanese Phrase Line Breaking

LGTM3 On 9/13/23 5:46 PM, Daniel Bratell wrote: LGTM2 /Daniel On 2023-09-13 17:14, Philip Jägenstedt wrote: LGTM1 If there is feedback on the TAG review or Mozilla issue while this feature is on its way to stable, can you loop back to this thread? On Thu, Sep 7, 2023 at 4:01 PM Philip

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Payment handler minimal header UX

LGTM1 (I'm not sure you need our approvals to ship this UX change, but you can have mine). On 9/8/23 7:09 PM, Rouslan Solomakhin wrote: *Contact emails *nbur...@chromium.org *Explainer* https://crbug.com/1385136 - see comment 14 for screenshot *Specification* Not applicable *Design docs*

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Protected Audience directFromSellerSignals via HTTP response headers

On 9/11/23 12:55 PM, Mike Taylor wrote: On 9/7/23 6:00 PM, Caleb Raitto wrote: Hi Yoav, some responses inline: On Wednesday, September 6, 2023 at 12:15:45 PM UTC-4 Yoav Weiss wrote: On Tue, Sep 5, 2023 at 9:55 PM Paul Jensen wrote: Contact emails* pauljen

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: Speculation Rules - Document rules, response header

LGTM to extend from 119 to 120 (inclusive). On 9/11/23 12:45 PM, Domenic Denicola wrote: Contact emails jbro...@chromium.org , adith...@chromium.org , dome...@chromium.org Explainer

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Protected Audience directFromSellerSignals via HTTP response headers

On 9/7/23 6:00 PM, Caleb Raitto wrote: Hi Yoav, some responses inline: On Wednesday, September 6, 2023 at 12:15:45 PM UTC-4 Yoav Weiss wrote: On Tue, Sep 5, 2023 at 9:55 PM Paul Jensen wrote: Contact emails* pauljen...@chromium.org *Explainer*

Re: [blink-dev] IP Protection feature status

Hi David, I just set it to "In Development". thanks, Mike On 9/8/23 8:50 PM, David Dabbs wrote: Hello. IP Protection feature card indicates /No active development/. But there are issues underway, some

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate and Remove: Dangling markup in target name

LGTM1 to ship. Risk seems very low (and worth it, given security improvements), but thanks for adding a runtime enabled feature. On 9/7/23 12:44 AM, 'Jun Kokatsu' via blink-dev wrote: Contact emails jkoka...@google.com Specification

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Enrollment for Privacy Sandbox

On 9/7/23 6:06 PM, Shivani Sharma wrote: On Friday, September 1, 2023 at 6:20:34 PM UTC-4 Mike Taylor wrote: Thanks. One last question here: how confident are y'all that consumers of these APIs are well-equipped for errors in case they don't enroll? Have you looked at any Privacy

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Implement and Ship: DisplayMediaStreamOptions monitorTypeSurfaces

LGTM2 On 9/6/23 11:01 AM, Yoav Weiss wrote: LGTM1 to ship, while keeping an eye out for TAG feedback, in case it'd be surprising and not match past feedback in the same vein. On Wed, Sep 6, 2023 at 5:41 PM 'François Beaufort' via blink-dev wrote: On Fri, Sep 1, 2023 at 3:09 PM

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Sec-CH-Prefers-Reduced-Transparency User Preference Media Features Client Hints Header

LGTM2 On 9/6/23 10:25 AM, Yoav Weiss wrote: LGTM1 On Sat, Sep 2, 2023 at 1:06 AM Luke wrote: Apologies, https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/632 would be the relevant link. Will update in Chromestatus too. On Friday, 1 September 2023 at 23:10:25 UTC+1

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Remove Authorization header upon cross-origin redirect

LGTM2 On 9/3/23 8:12 PM, Yoav Weiss wrote: LGTM1 On Mon, Sep 4, 2023 at 2:24 AM Kenichi Ishibashi wrote: Hi, sorry for the long delay. The feature page now shows sites that use Authorization header for

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Enrollment for Privacy Sandbox

On 9/1/23 2:46 PM, Shivani Sharma wrote: Thanks Mike! Responses inline. On Fri, Sep 1, 2023 at 1:09 PM Mike Taylor wrote: Hi Shivani, In general I think this is a pretty interesting idea, just a few minor questions below: On 8/30/23 8:16 AM, Shivani Sharma wrote

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Sec-CH-Prefers-Reduced-Transparency User Preference Media Features Client Hints Header

On 8/30/23 3:55 PM, Luke wrote: Contact emails lukewarlow...@gmail.com, l...@warlow.dev Explainer https://github.com/wicg/user-preference-media-features-headers/blob/main/README.md Specification

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: X25519Kyber768 key encapsulation for TLS

Hi David, LGTM to experiment from M117 - M118 inclusive. I think that's what you're asking for - please let me know if I'm reading this incorrectly. Good luck! thanks, Mike On 8/28/23 9:18 AM, 'David Adrian' via blink-dev wrote: Contact emails dadr...@google.com

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Fenced Frames - Functionality Updates

I also had an offline discussion with Daniel to confirm shipping as-is in M117, and sanitizing in 118 is acceptable from a security POV (trust but verify, etc). LGTM1 to ship. On 8/31/23 7:55 AM, 'Garrett Tanzer' via blink-dev wrote: After some discussion offline, we're going to sanitize the

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Enrollment for Privacy Sandbox

Hi Shivani, In general I think this is a pretty interesting idea, just a few minor questions below: On 8/30/23 8:16 AM, Shivani Sharma wrote: Contact emails shivani...@chromium.org , georg...@google.com

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Japanese Phrase Line Breaking

On 9/1/23 9:53 AM, Mike Taylor wrote: On 9/1/23 12:59 AM, Koji Ishii wrote: Contact emails ko...@chromium.org Explainer None Specification https://drafts.csswg.org/css-text-4/#valdef-word-break-auto-phrase Design docs https://docs.google.com

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Japanese Phrase Line Breaking

On 9/1/23 12:59 AM, Koji Ishii wrote: Contact emails ko...@chromium.org Explainer None Specification https://drafts.csswg.org/css-text-4/#valdef-word-break-auto-phrase Design docs

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Tabbed web apps

No issues, thanks for the update. On 8/31/23 11:16 PM, 'Louise Brett' via blink-dev wrote: We aren't ready to start the origin trial in M117 so we are going to run it from M118-123 (inclusive). On Wednesday, July 26, 2023 at 1:19:33 PM UTC+10 Matt Giuca wrote: @Šime: Yes, the feature as

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: form-sizing CSS property

On 8/31/23 7:52 PM, TAMURA, Kent wrote: Contact emails tk...@chromium.org, ikilpatr...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/tkent-google/explainers/blob/main/form-sizing.md Specification https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/9251 Design docs

Re: [blink-dev] PSA: Disallowing unknown import attributes keys

/08/23 17:23, Mike Taylor wrote: On 8/28/23 5:33 AM, Nicolò Ribaudo wrote: Hello, we are implementing a breaking change to Chromium's import attributes implementation. The import attributes proposal (https://tc39.es/proposal-import-attributes/, previously known as "import asser

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Bounce Tracking Mitigations

, Christian Biesinger wrote: On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 3:25 PM Ben Kelly wrote: On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 11:38 AM Mike Taylor wrote: On 8/21/23 11:09 AM, Ben Kelly wrote: On Sun, Aug 20, 2023 at 11:27 PM Yoav Weiss wrote: Thanks for working on this important problem! On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 9

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: :user-valid and :user-invalid CSS pseudo-classes

I see that https://drafts.csswg.org/selectors-4/#issue-df919919 states that this and the :invalid/:valid flavors should apply to forms and fieldset elements. It doesn't look like the WPTs test for that - what do we do for those elements, and do you know if it's interoperable? On 8/28/23 11:54

Re: [blink-dev] PSA: Disallowing unknown import attributes keys

On 8/28/23 5:33 AM, Nicolò Ribaudo wrote: Hello, we are implementing a breaking change to Chromium's import attributes implementation. The import attributes proposal (https://tc39.es/proposal-import-attributes/, previously known as "import assertions") was recently updated to throw on

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: view-timeline shorthand sets view-timeline-inset

LGTM3 On 8/23/23 12:22 PM, Chris Harrelson wrote: LGMT2 On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 9:01 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: LGTM1 On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 5:26 PM Anders Hartvoll Ruud wrote: On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 3:23 PM Yoav Weiss wrote: On Wed, Aug 23, 2023

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype and Ship: Generic Sensor WebDriver endpoints

LGTM1 On 8/23/23 2:11 PM, Mathias Bynens wrote: Thank you for the detailed explanation. Proceeding as you described SGTM. On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 7:41 PM Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote: Thanks, Mathias. Mathias Bynens writes: > Question 1: Are they supportive of the Generic

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Partitioning Storage, Service Workers, and Communication APIs

encourage you to postpone the timing until the trial bug will be fixed to enable us, and other developers who would like to use the trial meta tag to be able to do so. Thanks! On Monday, July 31, 2023 at 7:55:33 PM UTC+3 Mike Taylor wrote

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Storage Access API with Prompts

ecurity reasons; Firefox is planning <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1837648> to incorporate the recent changes.) Chris On Wednesday, August 2, 2023 at 5:02:35 PM

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Opaque Response Blocking (ORB, aka CORB++) v0.2

LGTM3 On 8/22/23 10:37 AM, Yoav Weiss wrote: LGTM2 On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 7:23 PM Chris Harrelson wrote: LGTM1 to turn it on in M118 beta and report back to this group about use counter results/bugs reported on beta before it reaches stable. On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 2:50 

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: HTML search element

LGTM2 On 8/22/23 10:29 AM, Yoav Weiss wrote: LGTM1 Thanks for catching us up here! :) On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 5:31 AM Vladimir Levin wrote: On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 4:37 PM Joey Arhar wrote: Contact emails jar...@chromium.org

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Implement & Ship: AudioEncoderConfig.bitrateMode

LGTM2 On 8/22/23 10:10 AM, Yoav Weiss wrote: LGTM1. Mirroring video codecs makes sense. Glad to see Mozilla being supportive. On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 8:51 PM 'Thomas Guilbert' via blink-dev wrote: Contact emails tguilb...@google.com Explainer None

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Baselines in New TextMetrics API in Canvas

LGTM1 On 8/21/23 1:52 PM, Yi Xu wrote: Hi Yoav, In first attempt link , we tried to ship all the attributes under TextMetrics API (in 2018).

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Bounce Tracking Mitigations

On 8/21/23 11:09 AM, Ben Kelly wrote: On Sun, Aug 20, 2023 at 11:27 PM Yoav Weiss wrote: Thanks for working on this important problem! On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 9:28 PM Ben Kelly wrote: Sorry, it seems I left off the signals section of the template: Firefox: No

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Detect UA Transitions on same-document Navigations

LGTM2 On 8/16/23 6:38 PM, Chris Harrelson wrote: LGTM1 to ship once the spec PR has landed. On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 7:50 AM 'Khushal Sagar' via blink-dev wrote: Contact emails khushalsa...@google.com, liuwill...@google.com, hvanops...@google.com Explainer

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate: non-standard `shadowroot` attribute for declarative shadow DOM

That sounds fine to me. Side question: would it be possible to treat shadowroot as a legacy alias of shadowrootmode, in case usage doesn't go down? On 8/14/23 7:09 PM, Mason Freed wrote: I'm checking back in on this deprecation thread. In the intervening 5 milestones, the use counter for the

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Implement and Ship: Make URL parser to not decode percent-encoded ASCII character in URL's path

I'm having a hard time assessing the risk, despite the very low usage (it has doubled since the original email was sent - but still very low) and other browsers shipping it. That said, LGTM2 % having a base::Feature we can use as a killswitch, in case we discover something we didn't

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Prototype & Ship: Cookie Expires/Max-Age attribute upper limit for prior storage

Perhaps we could delay this change until M119 as I understand that the first cookies that were set more than 400 days ago are due to expire in the M118 window. That should give us some time to understand the impact in more concrete terms and mitigate some of the impact, were it to turn out to

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: WebRTC encoded transform - Modify Metadata functions

LGTM to experiment from 118 to 123 inclusive. On 8/11/23 9:07 AM, Guido Urdaneta wrote: Contact emails h...@chromium.org, agpa...@chromium.org, topr...@chromium.org, gui...@chromium.org Explainer

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Attribution Reporting features (lookback windows, flex-lite)

are not aware of any usage but do not have targeted metrics for this. On Friday, August 4, 2023 at 2:13:45 PM UTC-4 Mike Taylor wrote: On 8/3/23 4:39 PM, John Delaney wrote: Contact emails johni...@chromium.org, csharri...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/WICG

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Media Queries: prefers-reduced-transparency feature

1478736469, it doesn't seem like there's a lot of appetite from Apple or Mozilla. On 7/24/23 4:13 AM, Yoav Weiss wrote: I'd love to hear +Mike Taylor 's thought about this from an extra fingerprinting

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Remove quirks mode behavior for option label attribute

LGTM2, so long as we have a killswitch. On 8/9/23 7:08 AM, Daniel Bratell wrote: If I did the math correctly, that puts the likely breakage below 14% (95% confidence) of the population, or less than 0.002% of page loads. (Napkin math, don't quote me, but it's in that ballpark which is a

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >