Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Attribution Reporting features (lookback windows, flex-lite)

On 8/3/23 4:39 PM, John Delaney wrote: Contact emails johni...@chromium.org, csharri...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/WICG/attribution-reporting-api/blob/main/flexible_event_config.md#phase-1-lite-flexible-event-level* *

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS cap and rcap font units

LGTM1 On 8/4/23 6:41 AM, Daniil Sakhapov wrote: Contact emails sakha...@chromium.org Explainer Two font units related to the cap-height of the font. They are the last two to fully cover CSS Values font related units. Specification

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Consistent minimum font size across languages

LGTM2 On 8/4/23 1:32 AM, Daniel Bratell wrote: LGTM1 /Daniel On 2023-08-04 07:13, Koji Ishii wrote: Contact emails ko...@chromium.org Specification None Design docs

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Storage Access API with Prompts

On 8/2/23 4:47 PM, Chris Fredrickson wrote: Contact emails cfred...@chromium.org, johann...@chromium.org, shuu...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/privacycg/storage-access/blob/main/README.md

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Prototype and Ship: Clip-path geometry-box values

LGTM3 On 8/2/23 12:00 PM, Chris Harrelson wrote: LGTM2 On Tue, Aug 1, 2023 at 2:19 PM Alex Russell wrote: LGTM1 On Tuesday, August 1, 2023 at 1:27:31 PM UTC-7 Philip Rogers wrote: Contact emails p...@chromium.org Explainer None

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Clear BFCache during browsing data removal

:32, 'Fergal Daly' via blink-dev wrote: On Tue, 1 Aug 2023 at 23:44, Mike Taylor wrote: On 8/1/23 7:54 AM, 'Mingyu Lei' via blink-dev wrote: Contact emails le...@chromium.org, fer...@chromium.org Explainer None

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: FedCM Sign-in Status API

Yep, sounds good. Thanks for the heads up! On 8/1/23 1:24 PM, Christian Biesinger wrote: FYI, we are extending this origin trial to Android (excluding webview) in Chrome 117. I understand we do not need a new LGTM for that. Christian On Fri, Jun 9, 2023 at 10:00 AM Mike Taylor wrote

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Clear BFCache during browsing data removal

On 8/1/23 7:54 AM, 'Mingyu Lei' via blink-dev wrote: Contact emails le...@chromium.org, fer...@chromium.org Explainer None Specification None Given that WebKit is shipping this and we would like to, any reason to not document this behavior to the Clear-Site-Data

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Prototype: Web environment integrity API

Hi Billy Bob, On 7/29/23 1:11 AM, Billy Bob wrote: I have thoughtfully and respectfully written this comment. Please review it! But then I'm grateful that the blink-dev community remains a place where we can disagree respectfully and iterate openly and publicly on difficult and

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Partitioning Storage, Service Workers, and Communication APIs

On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 11:52 AM Mike Taylor wrote: No, we don't know with certainty. You can watch https://chromiumdash.appspot.com/releases?platform=Windows to see when 115 is being served to 100% for all platforms. Toda

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: HTTPS pages with Cache-control: no-store and Back/Forward Cache

ppy to just be conservative and go with _monitoring all cookies_. Otherwise*, we would like to discuss this further. /* "Otherwise" means _monitoring all cookies_ will only give us negligible cache hit-rate improvement, *and* _monitoring HttpOnly cookies_ will give us a

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Transitions on specified discrete properties

Thanks for the heads up. Mind sharing some links to the compat issues? On 7/27/23 8:57 PM, Joey Arhar wrote: FYI: due to compat issues I encountered while launching this feature, we decided to create a CSS property to opt-in to the new behavior. It was resolved by the CSSWG here:

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: SoftNavigation performance Entry

LGTM to extend from M117-M120 inclusive, especially with the pause in 115 and 116. Thanks for demonstrating spec progress and sharing OT results (I'm not going to pretend I watched that whole 42 minute video tho - I trust that you did. ^__^). On 7/27/23 12:29 PM, Yoav Weiss wrote:

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Web Serial support for Bluetooth RFCOMM services

b Serial API to connect to both devices, then sends data over USB and shows that it is received from the HC-06 over Bluetooth. On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 2:13 PM Mike Taylor wrote: LGTM1 - thanks for the well-written explainer. On 7/26/23 4:20 PM, Alex Russell wrote: So

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Partitioning Storage, Service Workers, and Communication APIs

mk...@chromium.org wrote: LGTM3 with all the caveats about careful rollout discussed above. -mike On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 5:39 PM Mike Taylor wrote: OK - let's consider this I2S offici

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Web Serial support for Bluetooth RFCOMM services

LGTM1 - thanks for the well-written explainer. On 7/26/23 4:20 PM, Alex Russell wrote: Sounds good; thanks for explaining. On Wednesday, July 26, 2023 at 1:02:00 PM UTC-7 Reilly Grant wrote: On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 10:03 AM Alex Russell wrote: A screenshot would go a long

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Partitioning Storage, Service Workers, and Communication APIs

eful rollout discussed above. -mike On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 5:39 PM Mike Taylor wrote: OK - let's consider this I2S officially revived. Looking for a 3rd LGTM to begin shipping in M115. We have imp

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: WebAuthn PRF extension

This will hit stable in M116. I don't see any movement on https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/798 or https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/issues/183, but there may be bugs in their public trackers you can find and follow. On 7/24/23 8:11 PM, Vivek Bhupatiraju

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Protected Audience features: recency, rounding bids & scores

LGTM2 On 7/26/23 12:10 PM, Chris Harrelson wrote: LGTM1 On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 5:31 PM Paul Jensen wrote: Contact emails pauljen...@chromium.org Explainer

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Compression dictionary transport with Shared Brotli

LGTM to experiment from 117 to 122 inclusive. (Good luck, looks cool!) On 7/25/23 9:52 PM, Tsuyoshi Horo wrote: Contact emails h...@chromium.org, pmee...@chromium.org, yoavwe...@chromium.org, kenjibah...@chromium.org Explainer

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Media Queries: prefers-reduced-transparency feature

re's a lot of appetite from Apple or Mozilla. On 7/24/23 4:13 AM, Yoav Weiss wrote: I'd love to hear +Mike Taylor <mailto:miketa...@chromium.org> 's thought about this from an extra fingerprinting bit perspective. Also, how would users signal their preference? On Fri, Jul 21, 2023, 2

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: Sec-CH-Prefers-Reduced-Transparency User Preference Media Features Client Hints Header

Thanks for the links - when you get to the I2S stage, it's probably a good idea to add a comment to each letting them know that there's a proposal to ship this new one. On 7/24/23 2:47 PM, Luke wrote: Just to follow up on the position request. A position request was filed as part of the

Re: [blink-dev] PSA: Warning on Insecurely-Delivered Downloads

On 7/21/23 2:22 PM, Joe DeBlasio wrote: Hi blink-dev! Starting shortly after HTTPS Upgrades ships, Chrome will start showing warnings when a user downloads files over an insecure (i.e. non-TLS) connection. This builds on

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Implement and Ship: Per-frame quantizer in VideoEncoder

w feedback or resolution on this one? On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 5:53 AM Sangwhan Moon wrote: (resending from correct email) On 2023年07月07日 00時32分12秒 (+09:00),

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: Sec-CH-Prefers-Reduced-Transparency User Preference Media Features Client Hints Header

On 7/20/23 8:19 AM, Luke wrote: Contact emails lukewarlow...@gmail.com, l...@warlow.dev Explainer https://github.com/wicg/user-preference-media-features-headers/blob/main/README.md Specification

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Zstd Content-Encoding

Can you clarify the proposed experiment (presumably N% of stable?) and the desired milestones? Thanks! On 7/14/23 4:57 AM, Nidhi Jaju wrote: Contact emails nidhij...@chromium.org Explainer

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: MathML columnspan/rowspan attributes on element

LGTM1 - seems like an obvious interop win. On 7/12/23 4:31 AM, Frédéric Wang wrote: Hello, This is actually an intent to ship (sorry for sending email with the wrong title). To summarize a bit conversations, columnspan/rowspan was something that was requested by web developers

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Support stroke-box, content-box and border-box in the transform-box CSS property

LGTM2 On 7/12/23 11:19 AM, Yoav Weiss wrote: LGTM1 - thanks for catching us up here! On Thursday, July 6, 2023 at 1:33:39 PM UTC+2 f...@opera.com wrote: Contact emails f...@opera.com Explainer None (see summary)

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Array grouping

LGTM1 On 7/11/23 1:33 PM, Shu-yu Guo wrote: Contact emails s...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/tc39/proposal-array-grouping/blob/main/README.md Specification https://tc39.es/proposal-array-grouping/ Summary Adds news

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: HTTPS pages with Cache-control: no-store and Back/Forward Cache

On 7/11/23 2:19 AM, 'Fergal Daly' via blink-dev wrote: [BCC chrome-bfca...@google.com] On Tue, 11 Jul 2023 at 15:16, Mingyu Lei wrote: +chrome-bfcache On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 1:08 PM Mingyu Lei wrote: Contact emails

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Private Aggregation API

LGTM1 On 7/10/23 2:04 PM, Alex Turner wrote: As a quick update, the WebDriver extension PR has now landed. (Thanks Mathias for the review!) So, it should be safe to include that change as part of this I2S. On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 4:00 AM Mathias Bynens wrote: Thank you for including a

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Attribution Reporting API

LGTM3 On 7/10/23 12:15 PM, Chris Harrelson wrote: LGTM2 On Thu, Jul 6, 2023, 7:29 PM Rick Byers wrote: On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 5:23 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 9:43 PM John Delaney wrote: Thanks, Yoav and Rick for the

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Inherit Base URL snapshot for about:blank and about:srcdoc, with about:blank inheriting from initiator, not parent.

LGTM1 On 7/10/23 11:23 AM, Dominic Farolino wrote: The niche-ness of these changes plus the fact that they've been rolled out on Canary+Dev for some time /and/ that we've already smoked out some compat issues at that level of experimentation for the adjacent work the team looked into

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Implement and Ship: Per-frame quantizer in VideoEncoder

On 7/5/23 8:57 PM, 'Eugene Zemtsov' via blink-dev wrote: Intent to Implement and Ship: Per-frame quantizer in VideoEncoder Contact emails ezemt...@google.com Explainer None Specification https://www.w3.org/TR/webcodecs/#video-encoder-bitrate-mode

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Read Chrome device attributes

On 7/4/23 5:35 AM, 'Sergii Bykov' via blink-dev wrote: Contact emails sby...@google.com Explainer https://github.com/Ananubis/WebApiDevice/blob/master/Explainer.md I see that getAnnotatedAssetId(), getAnnotatedLocation(), getDirectoryId(), and getSerialNumber() are all

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CustomElementsGetName

LGTM3 On 7/5/23 11:42 AM, slightlyoff via Chromestatus wrote: LGTM2 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "blink-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org. To view

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CustomElementsGetName

On 7/5/23 11:42 AM, slightlyoff via Chromestatus wrote: LGTM2 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "blink-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org. To view this

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype and Ship: contain-intrinsic-size: auto none support

LGTM3 On 7/5/23 11:40 AM, Daniel Bratell wrote: LGTM2 /Daniel On 2023-07-05 17:39, slightlyoff via Chromestatus wrote: Excited to see this land; LGTM1 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "blink-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship (I2S): Protected Audience

On 7/1/23 3:09 AM, Paul Jensen wrote: On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 5:33 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 9:54 PM Paul Jensen wrote: Yoav, Protected Audiences has been fortunate to have a ton of design contributions and feedback, but consequently

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Remove: CSS property -webkit-highlight

https://github.com/search?type=code=-webkit-highlight+language%3ACSS=CSS shows this has been used elsewhere (but I guess has just been useless in clank?). That said, LGTM2. On 7/1/23 4:33 AM, Rick Byers wrote: Removing a prefixed API with no behavior should be trivial, thanks for the

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Permissions-Policy: unload

LGTM3 On 6/30/23 9:10 PM, Rick Byers wrote: LGTM2 In addition to Yoav's comments I'll also add that it makes sense to me if WebKit and Gecko don't want this. They each have a lot more flexibility in how they avoid unload handlers, and WebKit already just doesn't fire them when they don't

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate: Deprecate unload event

Hi Fergal, Nice to have lunch with you today. On 6/28/23 5:06 PM, 'Fergal Daly' via blink-dev wrote: Hi API-owners, I am now asking for permission to go ahead with the following concrete unload deprecation plan below. * Tools and outreach o M115 Enable

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Implement and Ship: Remove Payment Request User Activation Requirement

LGTM3 On 6/28/23 2:06 AM, Stephen Mcgruer wrote: Thanks Mustaq for your input (and API OWNERS for the ongoing LGTMs, here's hoping for #3 :)). I agree with your points on the difficulty of making either user activation or capability delegation work across navigation (though I still personally

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: deliveryType (Resource Timing)

LGTM3 On 6/27/23 12:57 AM, Yoav Weiss wrote: LGTM2 On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 5:25 PM Rick Byers wrote: Note since the TAG and standards position requests were new on this, API owners were waiting a bit to hear if there was any feedback. But it's been two weeks now and this seems

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Shared Storage API

LGTM3 On 6/22/23 4:13 PM, Chris Harrelson wrote: LGTM2 On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 1:02 PM Rick Byers wrote: Similar to my comments for Topics  there's obviously a lot of interop risk around whether

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Fenced Frames

LGTM3 On 6/21/23 11:53 AM, Rick Byers wrote: LGTM2 On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 11:46 AM Chris Harrelson wrote: LGTM1 Thank you for thoroughly working through all the design and specification steps for this feature. Glad to see some positive signals from the TAG about the

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Implement & Ship: WebUSB exclusionFilters option in requestDevice()

LGTM1 On 6/21/23 2:32 AM, 'François Beaufort' via blink-dev wrote: Contact emails * fbeauf...@google.com reil...@google.com * Explainer *

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: WebGPU WebCodecs integration

LGTM3 On 6/19/23 7:09 AM, Yoav Weiss wrote: LGTM2 On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 12:28 PM 'François Beaufort' via blink-dev wrote: Thank you Alex. WebGPU can use VideoFrames in any worker so as long as they can be produced off-main thread

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Iterator helpers

LGTM1 - looks like a useful addition to the language. On 6/15/23 5:30 PM, Rezvan Mahdavi Hezaveh wrote: Contact emails rez...@chromium.org, s...@chromium.org Explainer None Specification https://tc39.es/proposal-iterator-helpers Summary Iterator

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: SoftNavigation performance entry

On Fri, Jan 6, 2023 at 11:13 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: Update: We're bumping the experimentation from M109 to M110 (till M113), to align with partner timelines (and avoid them rediscovering bugs fixed in M109). On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 3:16 PM Mike Taylor wrote: LGTM t

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Document picture-in-picture

LGTM3 On 6/14/23 11:47 AM, slightlyoff via Chromestatus wrote: LGTM2 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "blink-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org. To view

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: scheduler.yield()

LGTM to experiment from 115 to 118 inclusive. On 6/13/23 1:53 PM, Scott Haseley wrote: Contact emails shase...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/WICG/scheduling-apis/blob/main/explainers/yield-and-continuation.md Specification None Summary

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: EditContext API

Do you all have a timeline in mind for experimentation? On 6/12/23 7:00 PM, 'Daniel Clark' via blink-dev wrote: Contact emails sni...@microsoft.com , shih...@microsoft.com , bemat...@microsoft.com

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: FedCM Sign-in Status API

LGTM to experiment from M116 to M119 inclusive. On 6/8/23 5:38 PM, Christian Biesinger wrote: Contact emails cbiesin...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/fedidcg/FedCM/blob/main/proposals/idp-sign-in-status-api.md

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Private State Tokens API

for other APIs that check at runtime, we can try to integrate with that when PST calls are made with an unregistered issuer. On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 7:05 PM Mike Taylor wrote: LGTM1

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Capture all screens

Also, it would be good to file a TAG review sooner than later to prevent any delays at a possible future I2S time. On 6/7/23 11:53 AM, Chris Harrelson wrote: LGTM On Tue, Jun 6, 2023 at 1:57 PM Simon Hangl wrote: Contact emails simo...@google.com Explainer

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Remove: document.open sandbox inheritance

The risk seems quite low here, thanks for the explanation. LGTM2. On 6/5/23 6:10 AM, Yoav Weiss wrote: LGTM1 to remove On Mon, Jun 5, 2023 at 10:15 AM Arthur Sonzogni wrote: Contact emails arthursonzo...@chromium.org Explainer

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Add value argument to URLSearchParams's has() and delete()

I wasn't able to find anything obvious in the nuxt org on GitHub, but I did post a question in their discussion forum: https://github.com/nuxt/nuxt/discussions/21382 On 6/4/23 3:05 PM, Debadree Chatterjee wrote: Hey! So I did a more thorough testing! and it seems there is something common

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: COOP: restrict-properties

LGTM to experiment from M116 to M119 inclusive. On 6/1/23 3:19 AM, 'Arthur Hemery' via blink-dev wrote: Contact emails ahem...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/hemeryar/coi-with-popups Specification https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/6364

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS font-variant-position property

LGTM2 On 5/31/23 10:30 AM, Rick Byers wrote: Yes, 100%. Very good point, I was definitely over-simplifying the measurement challenge. Thanks David! On Tue, May 30, 2023, 5:47 p.m. David Baron wrote: I was trying to avoid being too specific about what would be worth measuring both

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Partitioning Storage, Service Workers, and Communication APIs

after M115 is released) Aug 8th: 10% Aug 22nd: 50% Sep 5: 100% As always, if we discover significant user-facing breakage we'll explore pausing or rolling back to address. thanks, Mike On 5/1/23 10:43 AM, Mike Taylor wrote: Thanks Rick and Yoav. We learned from two partners (one internal

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: Speculation Rules - Document rules, response header, deliveryType

LGTM to extend to 118 inclusive. On 5/24/23 3:30 PM, Jeremy Roman wrote: Contact emails jbro...@chromium.org, adith...@chromium.org, isabo...@google.com, dome...@chromium.org, kenjibah...@chromium.org Explainer

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate and Remove: “uuid-in-package” navigation with Web Bundles

LGTM3 On 5/24/23 11:05 AM, Mike West wrote: LGTM2. -mike On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 12:38 PM Yoav Weiss wrote: LGTM1 to remove, given the extremely low usage On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 3:50 AM Hayato Ito wrote: Primary eng (and PM) emails hay...@chromium.org

Re: [blink-dev] Request for Deprecation Trial: Unpartitioned 3rd party Storage, Service Workers, and Communication APIs

Thanks! On 5/21/23 9:06 PM, Yoav Weiss wrote: My LGTM still stands! On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 8:03 PM Mike Taylor wrote: Hi all, Due to the need to add 3P support to the DisableThirdPartyStoragePartitioning deprecation trial (which has landed in the M115 branch), we would like

Re: [blink-dev] RE: Intent to Experiment: Align clipboard async API read/write HTML format with DataTransfer API

LGTM to experiment from 116 to 121 inclusive. On 5/18/23 6:04 PM, 'Ana Sollano Kim' via blink-dev wrote: Adding @Joshua Bell and @Daniel Cheng . *From:*Ana Sollano Kim *Sent:* Thursday, May 18, 2023 2:54 PM *To:*

Re: [blink-dev] Request for Deprecation Trial: Unpartitioned 3rd party Storage, Service Workers, and Communication APIs

weeks. thanks, Mike On Wednesday, March 22, 2023 at 11:50:50 AM UTC-4 Mike Taylor wrote: > I forgot to follow-up here - the deprecation trials are now working in > M112 (modulo one issue to fix for > DisableThirdPartySessionStoragePartitioningAfterGeneralPartitioning related >

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: WebAuthn PRF extension

LGTM2 On 5/16/23 5:42 AM, Mike West wrote: LGTM1, with the suggestion that following up on Caleb's comments about the spec's privacy section would be appreciated. -mike On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 9:16 AM Morgaine (de la faye) wrote: Hello. I don't have any present use cases as a web

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship : Content-type in Resource Timing

happens. Thanks,    Rick On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 11:25 AM Daniel Bratell wrote: /LGTM2 /Daniel On 2023-04-12 00:54, Mike Taylor wrote: LGTM1 On 4/11/23 5:27 AM, Yoav Weiss wrote: Thank

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS Motion Path

Hi Daniil, On 5/11/23 8:38 AM, Daniil Sakhapov wrote: Contact emails sakha...@chromium.org Explainer As part of the Interop 2023 we ship the rest of the CSS Motion Path. Currently only path() works. And after a spec has been reworked other path types are ready to be

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Private State Tokens API

LGTM1 % resolving the following spec issues: https://github.com/WICG/trust-token-api/issues/232 https://github.com/WICG/trust-token-api/issues/230 On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 5:52 AM Mike West wrote: Will devtools help guide developers towards enrollment? Also I think Mike's question on

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Implement & Ship: User-Agent Reduction Phase 6 (deviceModel and androidVersion reduction in Android)

  is currently ramping up to 5% of the stable release population. We will keep monitor the change during the 2 week experiment. Thanks. Victor On Monday, March 20, 2023 at 12:09:41 PM UTC-4 Mike Taylor wrote: Hi all, Correcting my

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Implement & Ship: User-Agent Reduction Phase 6 (deviceModel and androidVersion reduction in Android)

during the 2 week experiment. Thanks. Victor On Monday, March 20, 2023 at 12:09:41 PM UTC-4 Mike Taylor wrote: Hi all, Correcting my message on 3/3 to be consistent with the rollout timeline I posted on Feb 16 <ht

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Keyboard-focusable scroll containers

update WPT accordingly. On Friday, April 28, 2023 at 7:08:37 AM UTC-7 Mike Taylor wrote: On 4/27/23 5:28 PM, Di Zhang wrote: Contact emails h...@chromium.org, xiaoche...@chromium.org

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Boolean Context Style Container Queries

LGTM3 On 5/9/23 4:38 AM, Philip Jägenstedt wrote: LGTM2 On Wed, May 3, 2023 at 11:35 PM Manuel Rego Casasnovas wrote: LGTM1 On 03/05/2023 14:22, Rune Lillesveen wrote: > >         Contact emails > > futh...@chromium.org > >

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Resource Timing: Expose interim response times

LGTM1 On 5/8/23 5:45 AM, 'Noam Rosenthal' via blink-dev wrote: On Wednesday, April 26, 2023 at 6:54:40 PM UTC+3 Noam Rosenthal wrote: On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 1:32 PM Yoav Weiss wrote: On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 10:47 AM Noam Rosenthal wrote: Contact

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Deprecate and Remove Web SQL

LGTM2 - kudos to the team for the very detailed compat and risk analysis, as well as proactively engaging in outreach. Good luck. :) On 5/3/23 6:59 AM, Yoav Weiss wrote: LGTM1 Thanks for the details analysis. The rollout plan seems reasonable, and the low effective breakage gives me hope

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Experiment: Compute Pressure

Apologies for this slipping through the cracks. LGTM to experiment from M115 to M117. On 5/1/23 6:15 PM, 'Ajay Rahatekar' via blink-dev wrote: +ajayrahte...@google.com Friendly ping for review. On Thursday, April 20, 2023 at 3:20:21 AM UTC-7 arnaud...@intel.com wrote: * Contact

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Partitioning Storage, Service Workers, and Communication APIs

that ready by M115. Once we land the fix, I'll circle back and look for a 3rd LGTM and have an updated rollout schedule. :) On 5/1/23 12:21 AM, Yoav Weiss wrote: LGTM2 On Thu, Apr 27, 2023, 16:23 Rick Byers wrote: On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 2:02 PM Mike Taylor wrote: On 4/26/23

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Scroll-driven animations

LGTM3 On 5/1/23 8:33 AM, Yoav Weiss wrote: LGTM2 On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 9:21 PM Alex Russell wrote: The easiest LGTM1 ever. Thank you for shipping this! On Fri, Apr 28, 2023, 7:44 PM Robert Flack wrote: Contact emails fla...@chromium.org,

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: removing the five-minute rule for

On 5/1/23 10:16 AM, Noam Rosenthal wrote: On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 5:15 PM Mike Taylor wrote: Hi Noam, Given the results, I would say you have the LGTMs you need to ship. Are you currently launched at 100% via Finch? LGTM to enable in tip of tree if so. No, should I slowly

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: removing the five-minute rule for

Hi Noam, Given the results, I would say you have the LGTMs you need to ship. Are you currently launched at 100% via Finch? LGTM to enable in tip of tree if so. later, Mike On 5/1/23 2:06 AM, Noam Rosenthal wrote: Additional LGTMs? On Monday, April 24, 2023 at 6:58:20 PM UTC+3 Noam

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Cross App and Web Attribution Measurement

LGTM to experiment from M114 to M119 inclusive. On 5/1/23 8:52 AM, Nan Lin wrote: Contact emails johni...@chromium.org , csharri...@chromium.org , lin...@chromium.org Explainer

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Storage Buckets API

LGTM to experiment from M115 to M118. On 4/28/23 1:01 PM, 'Ajay Rahatekar' via blink-dev wrote: Contact emails est...@chromium.org, a...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/WICG/storage-buckets/blob/main/explainer.md

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Keyboard-focusable scroll containers

On 4/27/23 5:28 PM, Di Zhang wrote: Contact emails h...@chromium.org, xiaoche...@chromium.org, dizha...@chromium.org Explainer None Specification None What's the reason for not having a spec? Is the idea that this is covered by this definition of a "focusable

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to ship: VisibilityStateEntry

LGTM2 On 4/27/23 2:44 AM, Yoav Weiss wrote: LGTM1 Please send a webkit position for this, even if it is non-blocking. On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 5:53 PM Noam Rosenthal wrote: On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 1:28 PM Yoav Weiss wrote: Thanks for pushing this over the line!!

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Local Network Access allowing same-origin fetches to potentially trustworthy origins

LGTM2 (sorry for the delay, it seems this fell out of our review queue). On 4/27/23 9:56 AM, Jonathan Hao wrote: Hi Yoav, It's been 2 weeks but no other API owners have replied.  Do you know if there's any blockers?  Should we ping the other API owners or could you help us? Best, Jonathan

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: WGSLLanguageFeatures for WebGPU

All good - I've flagged it in our chromestatus tool so it doesn't fall off our radar. (and updating the email title just in case) On 4/26/23 2:42 PM, 'Loko Kung' via blink-dev wrote: Ah, sorry for the misleading title. This is actually an Intent to Ship! Let me know if I should resend with

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Implement and Ship: Update of "xml" prefix handling in lookupNamespaceURI() and createNSResolver()

LGTM2 On 4/26/23 11:28 AM, Mike West wrote: LGTM1. Testing looks good, and skipping the TAG review for features specified and shipped in other browsers is pretty reasonable. The flat UseCounter also gives me confidence. :) -mike On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 12:50 AM TAMURA, Kent wrote:

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Private State Tokens API

g these changes to land inM114. Thanks, Eric & PST team On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 2:53 PM Mike Taylor wrote: Whoops, that happened in https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/780#issuecomment-14229950

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Partitioning Storage, Service Workers, and Communication APIs

On 4/26/23 9:36 AM, Mike Taylor wrote: On 4/25/23 12:00 PM, Rick Byers wrote: In terms of the standards / process piece, it looks as if the spec PRs have all stalled for several months. What do you think is necessary to get these unblocked and landed? As the last engine to implement

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Partitioning Storage, Service Workers, and Communication APIs

eems like the more compatible option for now. On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 10:52 AM Mike Taylor wrote: On 4/24/23 2:11 PM, Yoav Weiss wrote: Apologies for my slowness! On Thu, Apr 6, 2023 at 2:01 AM Mike Taylor wrote: On 4/4/23 11:51 PM, Yoav Weiss wrote: Th

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Implement and Ship: Remove Secure Payment Confirmation user activation requirement

LGTM3 On 4/25/23 11:05 AM, Yoav Weiss wrote: LGTM2 On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 4:15 PM Rick Byers wrote: This is a small behavior change to a shipped feature with no explicit API exposure. LGTM1 On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 2:05 PM Nick Burris wrote: Le mercredi 19 avril

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Partitioning Storage, Service Workers, and Communication APIs

On 4/24/23 2:11 PM, Yoav Weiss wrote: Apologies for my slowness! On Thu, Apr 6, 2023 at 2:01 AM Mike Taylor wrote: On 4/4/23 11:51 PM, Yoav Weiss wrote: Thanks for working on this!! Aligning with Safari and Firefox on this means that this is important not just for user

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to remove: zoom CSS property

On 4/14/23 8:03 PM, Chris Harrelson wrote: Contact emails chris...@chromium.org Specification https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/zoom Summary Removes support for the non-standard "zoom" CSS property. This CSS property causes computed lengths for

Re: [blink-dev] Allow Navigator.registerProtocolHandler to register "payto"

Agree - I've changed it to "Under Consideration" until they respond with an official position. Thanks for pointing that out, Dave. On 4/14/23 10:44 AM, Dave Tapuska wrote: I feel the chromestatus is a bit misleading on the Mozilla position. It indicates "Worth Prototyping" with a link to the

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Partitioning Storage, Service Workers, and Communication APIs

Hi Eric, On 4/13/23 8:13 PM, Eric Lawrence wrote: What I mean by "hard to reason about" is that we are, retroactively shipping changes to APIs such that they no longer "do what they say on the tin"-- BroadcastChannels no longer broadcast, SharedWorkers are no longer shared, etc. That's only

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Partitioning Storage, Service Workers, and Communication APIs

Right, it's lumped under the Communication API section of the explainer. We could call it StorageKey Partitioning to be more precise, but I'm not sure that gains us much. On 4/13/23 8:09 PM, Alex Russell wrote: It's going to be surprising to developers that BroadcastChannel is "storage" On

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: Privacy Sandbox Ads APIs

Hi John, Could you comment on any additional progress made in the 5 required areas for OT extensions (see https://www.chromium.org/blink/launching-features/#origin-trials)? thanks, Mike On 4/12/23 5:44 PM, John Delaney wrote: Greetings, We would like to extend the origin trial for all of

Re: [blink-dev] Allow Navigator.registerProtocolHandler to register "payto"

Got it - we'll treat this as an Intent to Prototype then (typically an Intent starts with "Intent to Prototype" (or Experiment, Ship, etc.). You'll want to create a chromestatus.com entry with the proposed new feature (see https://www.chromium.org/blink/launching-features/#launch-process -

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Remove: Support for Web Push Notifications using FCM Sender IDs

LGTM3 On 4/12/23 11:14 AM, Daniel Bratell wrote: LGTM2 /Daniel On 2023-04-12 14:20, Yoav Weiss wrote: LGTM1 On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 2:04 PM Peter Beverloo wrote: On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 12:02 PM Yoav Weiss wrote: Sounds like breakage is tolerable, and senders would be

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >