Thanks for the bug report! We'll triage it in our regular meeting tomorrow.

And yes, your understanding of the timing is correct (we've been working on this project for 2+ years <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/WXNzM0WiQ-s/m/l10NGhaoAQAJ>, and in dev-trial since September <https://developer.chrome.com/en/blog/storage-partitioning-dev-trial/> of last year). Note that advancing to a higher percentage will depend on the stability and web-compatibility of partitioned 3P storage.

thanks,
Mike

On 7/30/23 12:04 PM, Tim Williams wrote:
I've submitted the following bug: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1468811 since the trial isn't working while I did everything right.

On Saturday, July 29, 2023 at 2:52:22 AM UTC+3 Tim Williams wrote:

    Hey There,
    I am truly struggling to understand the timing here.
    Currently, the partitioning is under a flag.
    Are you saying that the flag would be turned on to 100% of Desktop
    and Android users on Sept 8th THIS YEAR??

    That's a huge and extremely fast change, wow.

    On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 10:33:01 PM UTC+3 Kyra Seevers wrote:

        Hi all,

        M115 is now being served at 100% on Desktop and Android. We
        will begin the rollout to Stable 1% shortly - the approximate
        rollout schedule is now as follows:

        Stable 1%: July 28th
        Stable 10%: Aug 11th
        Stable 50%: Aug 25th
        Stable 100%: Sept 8th

        On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 11:52 AM Mike Taylor
        <mike...@chromium.org> wrote:

            No, we don't know with certainty.

            You can watch
            https://chromiumdash.appspot.com/releases?platform=Windows
            to see when 115 is being served to 100% for all platforms.
            Today it's at 50% for Windows, for example.

            On 7/26/23 5:39 PM, Jagadeesha B Y wrote:
            Do we know when does M115 will hit 100%?  Exact date
            would help us to communicate on the storage partition
            impact to our customers.

            On Wednesday, July 26, 2023 at 2:12:10 PM UTC-7
            mike...@chromium.org wrote:

                On 7/26/23 4:01 PM, Vi S wrote:

                Hi Kyra,

                Per your message here
                
(https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/24hK6DKJnqY/m/tu0i5OmhCAAJ)
                it sounds like as of 7/26/2023, the Storage
                Partitioning change has not been released yet since
                M115 is not served to 100% of users. Is that
                correct? My understanding of this message is that
                M115 is currently served to 12.5% of users and that
                once M115 is served to 100% of users (which will
                happen in the next ~4 weeks), only then will the
                storage partition change be rolled out in a gradual
                manner. Is this understanding accurate?
                That's correct.


                Additionally, would you be able to provide an
                updated schedule for the rollout of the storage
                partitioning change (similar to the one linked here:
                
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/24hK6DKJnqY/m/Tts2gjrEBwAJ)
                ?

                Once we begin the gradual roll-out, we'll provide a
                estimated rollout schedule on this thread (I hesitate
                to do so now - it's hard to know when we will begin
                exactly).

                thanks,
                Mike


                Thank you

                On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 10:18:26 AM UTC-4 Kyra
                Seevers wrote:

                    Hi there,


                    Thank you for your email - as of today (Monday
                    7/24/23), the feature is not rolled-out to stable.


                    However, I can confirm that the rollout schedule
                    for this feature begins in M115 at Stable 1%
                    (once M115 is served to 100% of users). M115 is
                    currently served to 12.5% of users - you can
                    track the status
                    athttps://chromiumdash.appspot.com/releases?platform=Windows
                    
<https://chromiumdash.appspot.com/releases?platform=Windows>.
                    Two weeks after that, we'll go to 10%, assuming
                    no large stability or compatibility regressions.
                    Then 50 and 100% at additional 2 week increments.


                    In the meantime, we have a deprecation trial
                    
(https://developer.chrome.com/blog/storage-partitioning-deprecation-trial/#participate-in-the-deprecation-trials
                    
<https://developer.chrome.com/blog/storage-partitioning-deprecation-trial/#participate-in-the-deprecation-trials>)
                    running in M115+ that allows sites who opt-in to
                    maintain unpartitioned storage for a few
                    milestones while they develop a
                    storage-partitioning-compatible solution.


                    Thanks,

                    Kyra


                    On Sun, Jul 23, 2023 at 7:05 PM Jagadeesha B Y
                    <jaga...@gmail.com> wrote:


                        I see that Chrome 115 release notes -
                        https://chromestatus.com/feature/5723617717387264
                        mentioning about storage partition being
                        enabled by default.  Could someone confirm
                        how gradual this rollout is?  do we know if
                        storage partition is rolled out fully?

                        Our SASS product has a heavy reliance on
                        Shared worker and this would break our
                        customer use cases.  We use shared worker to
                        co-ordinate Web RTC signalling and websocket
                        management which is critical for the app.
                        On Wednesday, May 31, 2023 at 8:42:15 AM
                        UTC-7 mk...@chromium.org wrote:

                            LGTM3 with all the caveats about careful
                            rollout discussed above.

                            -mike


                            On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 5:39 PM Mike
                            Taylor <mike...@chromium.org> wrote:

                                OK - let's consider this I2S
                                officially revived. Looking for a
                                3rd LGTM to begin shipping in M115.

                                We have implemented 3rd party
                                deprecation trial support for M115+
                                (see
                                
https://developer.chrome.com/blog/storage-partitioning-deprecation-trial/#participate-in-the-deprecation-trials),
                                and extended the deprecation trial's
                                expiration date accordingly to
                                account for the delay. And we have
                                the Enterprise policy ready to go.

                                The rollout schedule will look
                                something like the following,
                                pending metrics and compatibility
                                stability:

                                July 25th: 1% of Stable population
                                (approximately 1 week after M115 is
                                released)
                                Aug 8th: 10%
                                Aug 22nd: 50%
                                Sep 5: 100%

                                As always, if we discover
                                significant user-facing breakage
                                we'll explore pausing or rolling
                                back to address.

                                thanks,
                                Mike

                                On 5/1/23 10:43 AM, Mike Taylor wrote:

                                Thanks Rick and Yoav.

                                We learned from two partners (one
                                internal, one external) late last
                                week that a 3P deprecation trial
                                would be needed for them to
                                preserve widely-used functionality
                                while they work on a migration
                                strategy.

                                We're tracking the work in
                                crbug.com/1441411
                                <http://crbug.com/1441411> and hope
                                to have that ready by M115. Once we
                                land the fix, I'll circle back and
                                look for a 3rd LGTM and have an
                                updated rollout schedule. :)

                                On 5/1/23 12:21 AM, Yoav Weiss wrote:
                                LGTM2

                                On Thu, Apr 27, 2023, 16:23 Rick
                                Byers <rby...@chromium.org> wrote:



                                    On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at
                                    2:02 PM Mike Taylor
                                    <mike...@chromium.org> wrote:

                                        On 4/26/23 9:36 AM, Mike
                                        Taylor wrote:

                                        > On 4/25/23 12:00 PM,
                                        Rick Byers wrote:
                                        >
                                        >> In terms of the
                                        standards / process piece,
                                        it looks as if the spec
                                        >> PRs have all stalled
                                        for several months. What
                                        do you think is
                                        >> necessary to get these
                                        unblocked and landed? As
                                        the last engine to
                                        >> implement this
                                        behavior, perhaps we
                                        shouldn't feel too
                                        compelled to
                                        >> block shipping on PRs
                                        landing?

                                        I was gently reminded
                                        offline that I didn't
                                        answer this part of your
                                        question - oops.

                                        Right now it seems to me
                                        that the costs of landing
                                        these spec PRs is
                                        higher than we're willing
                                        to block on, given the
                                        requested refactoring
                                        (and yes, it's unfortunate
                                        that 3 engines would be
                                        shipping essentially
                                        unspecced behavior, but
                                        that's where we're at).
                                        That said, I'm happy to
                                        devote my few IC hours to
                                        pushing these along as a
                                        personal project over
                                        the coming months.


                                    Thanks Mike. I trust your and
                                    wanderview@'s judgement here -
                                    I know how hard y'all have
                                    been willing to work in the
                                    past to get the right thing
                                    done in specs. Thanks for
                                    being willing to keep pushing
                                    in parallel. But given two
                                    other implementations have
                                    already shipped this, it was
                                    clearly already a spec bug
                                    that the spec didn't reflect
                                    reality. I agree that we
                                    shouldn't block shipping a 3rd
                                    implementation on spec
                                    refactoring work.

                                    LGTM1 to ship from my
                                    perspective. Obviously this
                                    will need a very thoughtful
                                    and careful roll-out. But I
                                    trust Mike and his team to
                                    engage with impacted folks to
                                    make sure it goes smoothly, as
                                    they did with UA reduction.

--
                                You received this message because
                                you are subscribed to the Google
                                Groups "blink-dev" group.
                                To unsubscribe from this group and
                                stop receiving emails from it, send
                                an email to blink-dev+...@chromium.org.

                                To view this discussion on the web
                                visit
                                
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/bc52292b-9142-adad-d126-b93231468ed0%40chromium.org
                                
<https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/bc52292b-9142-adad-d126-b93231468ed0%40chromium.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

-- You received this message because you are
                        subscribed to the Google Groups "blink-dev"
                        group.
                        To unsubscribe from this group and stop
                        receiving emails from it, send an email to
                        blink-dev+...@chromium.org.

                        To view this discussion on the web visit
                        
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/0e6d131f-f6c7-4bbb-ad3e-bd68cd63ec0dn%40chromium.org
                        
<https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/0e6d131f-f6c7-4bbb-ad3e-bd68cd63ec0dn%40chromium.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.



--
                    Kyra Seevers (she/her) |     Software Engineer |
                    kyras...@google.com |       859-537-9917
                    <tel:(859)%20537-9917>




--
        Kyra Seevers (she/her) |         Software Engineer |
        kyras...@google.com |   859-537-9917 <tel:(859)%20537-9917>



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/b42ba165-da58-956d-e871-48f324c07d54%40chromium.org.

Reply via email to