Good point. Flow isolation gives some kind of “privacy”.
But I guess this is not the worse privacy violation one would be concerned
about in today Internet.
On Thu 19 Jul 2018 at 12:52, Dave Taht wrote:
> hahaha. Aside from their last slide not recommending fq, that was an
> enjoyable read. fq
hahaha. Aside from their last slide not recommending fq, that was an
enjoyable read. fq in this case (but I would deprioritize ping
responses slightly in the general case) makes the actual observed load
even more invisible.
I think traceroute would have been a better tool for this study.
and
This was presented at today's maprg session at the IETF:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/102/materials/slides-102-maprg-is-bufferbloat-a-privacy-issue-brian-trammell-00
-Toke
___
Bloat mailing list
Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
I get 25ms unloaded and 27ms loaded with cake running on the latest openwrt
rc. If I increase the shaping speed above what the link runs at, that goes
up to 30ms loaded.
Incidentally, speaking of the openwrt rc: for anyone upgrading their router
with sysupgrade, I usually ssh into my router and
Got 0 ms unloaded latency from mid Russia to Stockholm (~2000km). Something’s
wrong with this thing.
Victor Moiseev
Perm State University
+7 324 2396 626
From: Bloat [mailto:bloat-boun...@lists.bufferbloat.net] On Behalf Of Arie
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2018 1:45 PM
To: bloat
Subject:
