Re: [Bloat] [Cerowrt-devel] tp-link request for SQM

2021-12-03 Thread Luca Muscariello via Bloat
On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 3:35 PM Sebastian Moeller wrote: > Hi Dave, > > > > On Dec 3, 2021, at 15:18, Dave Taht wrote: > > > > On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 4:00 AM Luca Muscariello > wrote: > >> > >> Test using a tp-link AP EAP 245 > >> > >> >

[Bloat] fixing the debian default

2021-12-03 Thread Dave Taht
despite most of the debian derivatives adopting fq_codel, debian hasn't due to confusion at which team should step up. The issue got raised again for the next release, and code rebased: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=890343#106 -- I tried to build a better future, a few

Re: [Bloat] tp-link request for SQM

2021-12-03 Thread Dave Taht
On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 6:30 AM Wheelock, Ian wrote: > > I think for the last bullet in the text below, maybe change or remove the > comment completely concerning requesting a specific vendor version of the > COMCAST XB6 device, as the particular linked document, quite clearly noted > the

Re: [Bloat] [Cerowrt-devel] tp-link request for SQM

2021-12-03 Thread Sebastian Moeller
Hi Dave, > On Dec 3, 2021, at 15:18, Dave Taht wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 4:00 AM Luca Muscariello wrote: >> >> Test using a tp-link AP EAP 245 >> >> https://www.waveform.com/tools/bufferbloat?test-id=bbcc5ef5-e677-4f27-aa04-1849db81d0f5 > > Nice. > > A kvetch is that I really wish

Re: [Bloat] tp-link request for SQM

2021-12-03 Thread Dave Taht
On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 5:40 AM Rich Brown wrote: > > > > > On Dec 3, 2021, at 7:00 AM, Dave Täht wrote: > > > > tp-link, is, so far as I know, the last major home router vendor NOT > > shipping a SQM system. Perhaps this could be modded up with someones > > with accounts? > > > >

Re: [Bloat] tp-link request for SQM

2021-12-03 Thread Wheelock, Ian
I think for the last bullet in the text below, maybe change or remove the comment completely concerning requesting a specific vendor version of the COMCAST XB6 device, as the particular linked document, quite clearly noted the following on Page 18 (just before next steps) “All Comcast DOCSIS

Re: [Bloat] tp-link request for SQM

2021-12-03 Thread Dave Taht
On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 4:44 AM Kenneth Porter wrote: > > --On Friday, December 03, 2021 12:12 PM + "Wheelock, Ian" > wrote: > > > 280Mbps service with Comcast is likely the 300/10 package offering… In > > that case the US is limited to 10Mbps > > > > I understand there might be some issue if

Re: [Bloat] tp-link request for SQM

2021-12-03 Thread Dave Taht
On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 4:00 AM Luca Muscariello wrote: > > Test using a tp-link AP EAP 245 > > https://www.waveform.com/tools/bufferbloat?test-id=bbcc5ef5-e677-4f27-aa04-1849db81d0f5 Nice. A kvetch is that I really wish they also tested up and down at the same time. Another kvetch is I think

Re: [Bloat] tp-link request for SQM

2021-12-03 Thread Rich Brown
> On Dec 3, 2021, at 7:00 AM, Dave Täht wrote: > > tp-link, is, so far as I know, the last major home router vendor NOT > shipping a SQM system. Perhaps this could be modded up with someones > with accounts? > > https://community.tp-link.com/us/home/forum/topic/511156 Wait... what? Other

Re: [Bloat] tp-link request for SQM

2021-12-03 Thread Kenneth Porter
--On Friday, December 03, 2021 12:12 PM + "Wheelock, Ian" wrote: 280Mbps service with Comcast is likely the 300/10 package offering… In that case the US is limited to 10Mbps I understand there might be some issue if 280Mbps was being processed – but in the US direction, we are not

Re: [Bloat] tp-link request for SQM

2021-12-03 Thread Kenneth Porter
--On Friday, December 03, 2021 11:40 AM +0100 Sebastian Moeller wrote: No idea whether an archer 20 will do (not even sure what model that is, here in Germany I see either an C20 or an AX20 but no plain unadorned 20). If you should try OpenWrt on that thing, the OpenWrt forum is a good place

Re: [Bloat] tp-link request for SQM

2021-12-03 Thread Wheelock, Ian
Hi 280Mbps service with Comcast is likely the 300/10 package offering… In that case the US is limited to 10Mbps I understand there might be some issue if 280Mbps was being processed – but in the US direction, we are not talking >>100Mbps – its about 10Mbps US, I would have thought running cake

Re: [Bloat] tp-link request for SQM

2021-12-03 Thread Luca Muscariello via Bloat
Test using a tp-link AP EAP 245 https://www.waveform.com/tools/bufferbloat?test-id=bbcc5ef5-e677-4f27-aa04-1849db81d0f5 On Thu, Dec 2, 2021 at 7:48 PM Dave Taht wrote: > tp-link, is, so far as I know, the last major home router vendor NOT > shipping a SQM system. Perhaps this could be modded

Re: [Bloat] tp-link request for SQM

2021-12-03 Thread Sebastian Moeller
> On Dec 3, 2021, at 11:10, Kenneth Porter wrote: > > --On Thursday, December 02, 2021 10:48 AM -0800 Dave Taht > wrote: > >> tp-link, is, so far as I know, the last major home router vendor NOT >> shipping a SQM system. Perhaps this could be modded up with someones >> with accounts? >> >>

Re: [Bloat] tp-link request for SQM

2021-12-03 Thread Kenneth Porter
--On Thursday, December 02, 2021 10:48 AM -0800 Dave Taht wrote: tp-link, is, so far as I know, the last major home router vendor NOT shipping a SQM system. Perhaps this could be modded up with someones with accounts? https://community.tp-link.com/us/home/forum/topic/511156 I just signed