Re: [Bloat] [Make-wifi-fast] the wifi airtime-fair fq_codel stuff on net-next looks mostly good

Air time fairness has a strong theoretical foundation. So I should cite Newton and say that Toke is sitting on giants' schoulders :) In multi rate systems in a shared channel, time is the right resource to share. Then one could discuss about which fairness criterion to use, but that's

Re: [Bloat] [Make-wifi-fast] the wifi airtime-fair fq_codel stuff on net-next looks mostly good

On Wed, 12 Oct 2016, Dave Taht wrote: http://openwrtsummit.org/#quick-details I've had the discussion with "radio guys" before regarding "fairness" of radio resources. They kept talking about "optimising the cell for throughput". I told them "then we should give the speaker with the highest

Re: [Bloat] [Make-wifi-fast] the wifi airtime-fair fq_codel stuff on net-next looks mostly good

On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 8:32 AM, Jim Gettys wrote: > All I can say is I bow down to your persistence... The .debs are airtime-8 for a reason. I kept bisecting until I bothered to boot into a normal kernel and realized that my main test box had broken in the move during the

Re: [Bloat] [Make-wifi-fast] the wifi airtime-fair fq_codel stuff on net-next looks mostly good

All I can say is I bow down to your persistence... Congratulations! - Jim On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Dave Taht wrote: > Which I just wrote up here: > > http://blog.cerowrt.org/post/real_results/ > > Warning: includes a dancing cat