Dave Taht via Bloat wrote:
> I have prior to now, ignored this conference because it was not
> particularly technical. Does anyone go?
I don't know what it's like.
I read some of the USP agenda and I'm interested in a "if I'm nearby" level a
few months ago.
David Schinazi via Bloat wrote:
> My understanding is that Apple chose to report RTT as an inverse because
> people are used to "higher number means better". The target audience
> for
Yes. Stuart was pretty clear about this being the reason for the decision.
It seemed sound then
