Hi,
I just updated the infos at the MC wiki page (improve the generic
agenda, so that it is showing, what we discuss; link to the minutes
page; add mailing list name for how to contact the MC).
And in addition to that: I feel sorry to say, that yesterday's meeting
had to be adjourned. I hope
On 6/14/11 9:21 AM, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
This is indeed really good. Now, if IBM really throws in the code from Lotus
Symphony, we'll have to be prepared, as some journalists might change their
stance... Although probably not :-)
It would be nice to know what it might mean in practical ter
Hi :)
I thought everyone quickly checked that sort of thing anyway? I do. I thought
David was making a joke out of the need for people to be a little more aware of
one need for checking such rules. A serious point put forwards as a joke.
Regards from
Tom :)
_
Hi :)
I think it is better to do the minimum that is required to make it legal and
for
the rest write in things like "Mid-term replacements are to be covered by
internal TDF policy which is to be reviewed regularly". In some cases it makes
sense to name the specific document that will cover th
Hi :)
I thought the GPL, LGPL & MPL were all much more permissive than the Apache
licenses? I thought the whole point of OpenSource was that it is
contra-intuitive. By insisting on intellectual freedoms, ideas are able to
build on each other more easily.
Regards from
Tom :)
___
Italo,
2011/6/13 Italo Vignoli
> It looks like media are on our side.
>
> Ask LH: Am I Missing Out By Sticking With Open Source And Not Buying
> Microsoft ... on Lifehacker Australia
> <
> http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2011/06/ask-lh-am-i-missing-out-by-sticking-with-open-source-and-not-buying-mi
Hi Toki,
toki wrote on 2011-06-10 19.16:
When I was reading German law on non-profits, my impression was the
By-Laws had to specify how members of the board of directors, and any
advisory board were selected, and mid-term replacements done.
I don't see anything in the by-laws that specifies ho
